Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- 113
Summary
- Conditions
- Quality of Life
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Sexual Dysfunction
- Urinary Incontinence
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: Prospective randomized trialMasking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Treatment
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 18 years and 70 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
Prospective randomized trial comparing robotic versus laparoscopic Low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The Aim of the study is to compare two surgical approaches (robotic versus laparoscopic) for rectal cancer treatment regarding functional outcomes (sexual and urinary dysfunctions), quality o...
Prospective randomized trial comparing robotic versus laparoscopic Low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The Aim of the study is to compare two surgical approaches (robotic versus laparoscopic) for rectal cancer treatment regarding functional outcomes (sexual and urinary dysfunctions), quality of life, post operative outcomes and oncologic outcomes. Patients with the diagnosis of T3 mid and low rectal cancer will be randomized to robotic or laparoscopic procedure after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Quality of life questionnaires and Urodynamic test will be applied before and after the surgical procedures.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT03209076
- Collaborators
- Hospital de Câncer de Barretos
- Hospital dos Servidores do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marcus Valadão, Dr Instituto Nacional de Câncer-INCA
Get Well Soon