Comparison Between Optimal Coherence Tomography Guidance and Angiography Guidance in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Active, not recruiting
Summary
- Conditions
- Coronary Disease
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Treatment
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 20 years and 100 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
Comparison between Optimal Coherence tomography guidance and Angiography Guidance in percutaneous coronary intervention (COCOA) is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group, active-controlled, superiority trial comparing minimum stent area immediately after optical coherence...
Comparison between Optimal Coherence tomography guidance and Angiography Guidance in percutaneous coronary intervention (COCOA) is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group, active-controlled, superiority trial comparing minimum stent area immediately after optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with those after Angiography-guided PCI with a second generation drug-eluting stent.The primary endpoint of the present study was minimum stent area immediately after PCI. The secondary endpoint was target vessel failure (defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction, and ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation).
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT03176810
- Collaborators
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Takashi Akaska, MD Wakayama Medical University
Get Well Soon