Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
60

Summary

Conditions
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Type
Interventional
Phase
Not Applicable
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: Randomised parallel group controlled clinical trialMasking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)Masking Description: No maskingPrimary Purpose: Treatment

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 18 years and 85 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

Obstructive sleep apnoea is highly prevalent, with the obesity epidemic increasing the problem. The best treatment for uncomplicated and moderate-severe OSA remains CPAP therapy. However, long-term adherence to treatment with CPAP is poor and there are few alternatives. Electrical stimulation of the...

Obstructive sleep apnoea is highly prevalent, with the obesity epidemic increasing the problem. The best treatment for uncomplicated and moderate-severe OSA remains CPAP therapy. However, long-term adherence to treatment with CPAP is poor and there are few alternatives. Electrical stimulation of the dilator muscles of the upper airway has been shown to reduce nocturnal apnoeas significantly using an invasive approach, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, as well as by non-invasive transcutaneous stimulation. Although non-invasive transcutaneous stimulation may not be as effective as CPAP therapy in many OSA patients it could be an important option to treat some of the large number of patients who fail CPAP and might also be of use in those whose OSA is not judged sufficiently severe to warrant CPAP. The investigators propose a study to use a transcutaneous electrical stimulation device in selected patients with OSA who do not tolerate CPAP therapy following assessment of the upper airway. Participants will undergo a baseline sleep study (polysomnography). Following minimisation for gender (male/female) and OSA severity (mild/moderate-severe) they will be randomised into active treatment arm (transcutaneous electrical stimulation) or usual care (ongoing CPAP therapy). Patients will be treated over a period of 3-months in the community and the results will be compared against usual care, ongoing CPAP therapy. This study will help to prepare a definitive multi-centre randomized controlled trial using the non-invasive method of upper airway stimulation in OSA. The primary aim of this study is to assess efficacy and generate an accurate sample size estimation, test the subjective willingness of patients to use and objectively determined compliance with the treatment over a long period, as well as to specify the drop-out rate. The improvement in sleep apnoea will be the primary outcome measures. The symptomatic response, feasibility of the method, including compliance, comfort, adverse events, will be the secondary outcome measure. An ad-hoc analysis will be performed in the responder group (improvement in the apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) by >50% from baseline OR improvement in the 4% oxygen-desaturation index (ODI) >25% from baseline OR AHI/4%ODI <5/hour at follow up).

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT03160456
Collaborators
  • King's College London
  • Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
  • King's College Hospital NHS Trust
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Joerg Steier, MD, PhD Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Study Chair: John Moxham, MD King's College London Principal Investigator: Michael I Polkey, PhD Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust Principal Investigator: Kai Lee, MD King's College London NHS Foundation Trust