Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
Same as current

Summary

Conditions
  • Analgesia
  • Anxiolysis
  • Sedation
Type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Crossover AssignmentIntervention Model Description: This two-sided, superiority, cross-over trial is based on a clinically relevant reduction (?20%) of primary outcome (ECPA pain score >5) with the Dexmedetomidine treatment versus standard active control (opioids). It requires a sample size of 52 patients for a paired analysis with an intra-patient correlation of 50%. Type I error: 0.05 and type II error: 0.20. 25% of drop-out are expected. In consequence, 66 patients are required for the study.Masking: Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)Masking Description: The nurse administers to the patient both subcutaneous and intranasal dose, however, one of the two is a placebo. The subcutaneous placebo and the subcutaneous opioids have the same packaging. Similar procedure is done for the intranasal compounds. Neither medical staff nor patient knows which analgesia is administered before this nursing care.Primary Purpose: Supportive Care

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 65 years and 125 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

Although necessary for patient wellbeing, nursing care procedures potentially produce discomfort, that should be addressed before the procedures begin. In palliative care setting, daily procedures include mobilisation, hygiene care, wound dressing changes, etc. Non-invasive and simple nursing care p...

Although necessary for patient wellbeing, nursing care procedures potentially produce discomfort, that should be addressed before the procedures begin. In palliative care setting, daily procedures include mobilisation, hygiene care, wound dressing changes, etc. Non-invasive and simple nursing care procedures may cause anxiety and pain that can lead to a refusal of care or an increased distress. The data on procedural pain prevalence are almost only available in pediatrics and are scarce in palliative care and geriatric population. However, the SPdol french study, conducted on elderly people with palliative situations, showed that 85% of procedural pain was related to daily hygiene and comfort care. Results indicate also that in 42%, this type of care remained painful despite preventive pharmacologic measures as opioids administration. Intensity of procedural pain associated with daily and hygiene care is expected to be moderate to severe and not related to presence or absence of pain before initiation of the procedure but to bad prognostic. In the context of chronic health problems, comfort management pharmacological interventions to achieve analgesia, slight or conscious sedation during nursing care procedures must ideally combine the following properties: Rapid recovery and excellent cardiovascular and respiratory security profile; Be administrable in the regular place of care of the patient; Minimal requirement for medical surveillance in terms of time, equipment and staff; Reproducible inset and outset of the analgesic and anxiolytic effect; Easy to titrate; Convenient, little or non-invasive and administration route as painless as possible. Dexmedetomidine is allowed in Switzerland for intravenous (IV) medication in the intensive care unit in the adult patient. It is indicated to obtain a level of sedation no deeper than that allowing a response to a verbal stimulus. Its active molecule, Dexmedetomidine (Dex) is a selective and powerful agonist of ?2-adrenoreceptors (AR). This drug has come to be of growing interest in anesthesia and sedation field these last years in literature. Its pharmacological actions on the central nervous system consist in sedative, anesthetic, anxiolytic, analgesic action with good cardiovascular, respiratory and neuropsychic tolerance profile. The main possible secondary effect with IV Dex is bradycardia, due to decreased circulating epinephrine and norepinephrine levels observed with this drug. Intranasal (IN) administration is an easy-to-use and more efficient alternative than placebo or other sedatives (Midazolam, Ketamine, Chloral) for the sedation of sensitive or less collaborative populations as children and young adults. IN Dex applications described in the literature include analgesia and sedation for the realization of radiologic investigation, surgical procedures leading to pain and anxiety, dental care, endoscopy and electrochemotherapy, in combination with local anesthesia. IN Dex doses from 1 to 2µg/Kg in young adults and up to 4µg/Kg in children,have been shown to be effective for analgesia and sedation, in these contexts. From a pharmacological point of view, the superiority of the IN way compared to the oral one has been demonstrated in pediatrics. In healthy adults volunteers IN Dex bioavailability is 82% after a short time (2.6 min on average). The plasmatic peak of concentration is reached after 30 min on average (Tmax range 15-60min). The onset of sedation occurs at 45 min, with a peak effect observed at 90 min. There is increasing number of promising studies for the use of IN Dex for pediatric sedation due to its non-invasive nature, its efficiency and its rare secondary effects. However, there is currently no information in the literature on the use of IN Dex neither in elderly patients nor in palliative situations. In end-of-life population, pain is controlled with a subcutaneous administration of opioids as preventive analgesia before nursing cares, when necessary. Most of the time, this supplementary dose fails to relieve the patient from his pain. In SPdol observational study, 42% daily hygiene and comfort nursing care remained painful despite the administration of a preventive analgesia. Opioids limitations to prevent procedural pain are probably linked to anxiety and global discomfort induced by nursing care that opioids alone cannot alleviate. IN Dex seems to be a good candidate for procedural pain comfort pharmacological management giving its analgesic, anxiolytic and sedative properties in old people admitted with palliative situations. In this study the investigators compare the efficiency of IN Dex to the regular additional dose of opioids for analgesia, sedation and anxiolysis for daily nursing care on end-of-life elderly patients. The population of interest is widely heterogeneous according to its disease and medication. Moreover the pain feeling is specific to each person. Therefore a cross-over design was chosen so the patient is his own control. Each patient participates to 2 nursing care procedures where he receives both SC and IN administration. However, each time only one treatment is active while the other one is a placebo. Ex : SC placebo and IN Dex. After a period of wash-out (24 to 48h), the patient receives , on the next nursing care procedure, the complementary treatment combination (ex: SC opioids and IN placebo). To minimize bias, randomization is done by the pharmacy, on the treatment sequence and the study is double-blinded. In case of inefficient analgesia, the patient receives a rescue dose of Dormicum, 0.05mg/Kg. During each procedure the patient is monitored with validated tools for pain, anxiety, sedation, heart rate and oxygen saturation. The sedation state of the patient is assessed up to 45 minutes after treatment administration. At 45 minutes, the peak effect of the drugs (opioids as well as Dex) is reached and the nursing care can start and lasts for 15 to 30 minutes. The patient is followed-up during two hours after the end of the care. The total procedure lasts for 3h30 total.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT03151863
Collaborators
Not Provided
Investigators
Study Director: Walid Habre, MD, PhD University of Geneva