Comparison of Two Apical Repair Methods in Women Undergoing Repairs for Prolapse
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Complication
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Quality of Life
- Surgery
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: The study is designed as a RCT.Masking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Treatment
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 35 years and 80 years
- Gender
- Only males
Description
The aim of the study is to determine objective anatomical recurrent prolapse after SLF vs McCall. The study is designed as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Primary study endpoint will be at 12 months, secondary study endpoint at 24 months. The following parameters will be evaluated after one yea...
The aim of the study is to determine objective anatomical recurrent prolapse after SLF vs McCall. The study is designed as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Primary study endpoint will be at 12 months, secondary study endpoint at 24 months. The following parameters will be evaluated after one year: anatomical outcome, Quality of Life (QoL), sexual health, reoperations, and complications.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT03113513
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Not Provided
Get Well Soon