Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
2354

Summary

Conditions
Coronary (Artery) Disease
Type
Interventional
Phase
Not Applicable
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: This trial is a prospective, multi-center randomized comparative effectiveness trial of HCR compared to multi-vessel PCI with metallic DES in patients with multi-vessel CAD involving the LAD or LM territories.Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)Masking Description: The DCC Research Coordinator will be blinded to treatment assignment during follow-up telephone calls and will be blinded to aggregate outcomes data.Primary Purpose: Treatment

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 18 years and 125 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

The increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD), advances in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and concomitant medical therapy, and the costs of revascularization have resulted in rising interest regarding the appropriate indications and alt...

The increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD), advances in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and concomitant medical therapy, and the costs of revascularization have resulted in rising interest regarding the appropriate indications and alternatives for coronary revascularization. Hybrid coronary revascularization is the intended combination of CABG and PCI. The HCR strategy combines grafting of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) coronary artery using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and PCI of non-LAD coronary stenoses. Essentially, stents are substituted for saphenous vein grafts (SVG) for non-LAD lesions, and the surgical LIMA to LAD bypass is performed, ideally through a limited access, minimally traumatic approach. Unfortunately, the published data to date on HCR must be considered limited and hypothesis generating. Clinicians, payers, and patients are interested in the specific benefits of revascularization alternatives. HCR as a scientifically validated approach would have a major healthcare impact. The ability to deliver a new therapy for CAD that provides durability, but without the obligatory trauma and prolonged recovery time characteristic of conventional CABG would be a major advance in the field of cardiovascular medicine. The NHLBI-funded Hybrid Observational Study demonstrated that equipoise exists between the two coronary revascularization paradigms; however, a rigorously designed randomized clinical trial is now needed to provide sufficient evidence to guide clinical decision making for this important patient population. This trial is a prospective, multi-center randomized comparative effectiveness trial of HCR compared to multi-vessel PCI in patients with multi-vessel CAD involving the LAD or LM territories. The trial is designed as a "large, simple" trial, and some baseline, procedure-related and short-term outcomes data collection will be extracted from existing registry data (Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS] Data Registry). The overall objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (HCR) compared to multi-vessel PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease involving the Left Main and/or Left Anterior Descending arteries. The primary objective the trial is to determine whether hybrid coronary revascularization is associated with a reduction in Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events [MACCE] compared to PCI with DES. The secondary objectives are to determine the impact of HCR compared to PCI on health status and quality of life.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT03089398
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Emilia Bagiella, PhD Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Principal Investigator: Alan Moskowitz, MD Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Principal Investigator: John Puskas, MD Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Principal Investigator: Gregg Stone, MD Columbia University