Triamcinolone Injections for Persistent Choroidal Effusions Post Glaucoma Surgery

Summary

Participation Requirements

Description

Glaucoma is the second commonest cause of blindness in our society. The only effective treatment currently involves lowering the intraocular pressure (IOP) by medical, laser, or surgical techniques. Glaucoma surgery is indicated when further IOP lowering is needed despite maximal medical therapy and...

Glaucoma is the second commonest cause of blindness in our society. The only effective treatment currently involves lowering the intraocular pressure (IOP) by medical, laser, or surgical techniques. Glaucoma surgery is indicated when further IOP lowering is needed despite maximal medical therapy and appropriate laser treatment. The choroid is a pigmented and vascular structure located between the sclera and retinal pigmented epithelium. Choroidal effusions are aberrant collections of fluid within the suprachoroidal potential space. There are two types of choroidal effusion, serous and hemorrhagic, depending on the type of fluid that accumulates in the suprachoroidal space. A serous choroidal effusion is composed of a transudate fluid from increased transmural pressure across the capillaries. Their development is usually relatively painless. Hemorrhagic choroidal effusion or suprachoroidal haemorrhage is a sudden and usually very painful accumulation of blood in the suprachoroidal space. 4 Choroidal effusions can be caused by both low IOP and pro-inflammatory conditions. Causes of concomitant low IOP and inflammation include trauma and eye surgery, especially glaucoma surgery. Inflammatory causes include scleritis. Modern glaucoma surgery has minimized the incidence of postoperative hypotony and resultant choroidal effusion but it is still prevalent. 1 The prevalence of choroidal effusions after glaucoma surgery varies between 10 and 15%, with average of 13% after trabeculectomy (the standard technique of glaucoma surgery). 5 A complication of low-IOP-induced choroidal effusion is hypotony maculopathy, which can cause permanent decline in vision, especially if not resolved in a timely manner. 5 Treatment can be either medical or surgical. Medical treatment includes cessation of any systemic and topical IOP lowering agents and adding cycloplegic agents, topical steroids and eventually systemic steroids. If treatments do not increase the IOP and reduce the choroidal effusion, then surgical management should be considered. Depending on the particular clinical circumstances of each patient, different surgical approaches can be used, including revision of the trabeculectomy flap, anterior chamber reformation, and surgical drainage of the effusion. As an alternative to systemic steroids, steroids as triamcinolone acetonide (Kenalog™) can be injected in the subtenons space. This treatment allows for a high local dose of steroids, without exposing the patient to systemic treatment. Not every patient requires steroid injection, and this treatment will be reserved for patients who do not respond to medical management after a few days. Following the sham or Kenalog injection participants will receive topical prednisolone acetate 1% qid for 4 weeks or PRN Topical atropine 1% qid for one week or PRN. There are several studies in the literature showing the benefit of a triamcinolone injection for different inflammatory conditions, such uveitis and for the treatment of diabetic maculopaty and cystoid macular edema. 6-9 Recently Shen et al. published the benefit of subtenons triamcinolone acetonide in the management of a combination of retinal detachment and choroidal effusion. 2 However we did not find any studies that assessed the benefit on triamcinolone subtenons injection for choroidal effusion after glaucoma surgery. In a recent retrospective study we performed a chart review of the effect of subtenons triamcinolone injection in patients with choroidal effusions after glaucoma surgery compared to a group of patients who did not receive the injection as part of their management. We found that recovery time in the injection group was significantly shorter than in patients with no injection, 10.6 days versus 27.44 days. (p=0.02). The study showed no difference in final intraocular pressure (IOP), number of medications and visual acuity.

Tracking Information