Comparison of Intraabdominal Pressure
Last updated on April 2022Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Unknown status
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients who are scheduled for prone positioned spinal surgery
- ASA Physical Status Classification System class I or II
- Patients who are scheduled for prone positioned spinal surgery
- ASA Physical Status Classification System class I or II
Exclusion Criteria
- BMI > 30kg/m2
- Patients who did not insert urinary foley catheter
- Patients who did not agree
- ...
- BMI > 30kg/m2
- Patients who did not insert urinary foley catheter
- Patients who did not agree
- Patients who have COPD or emphysema
- Patients who have severe spine deformities such as scoliosis
Summary
- Conditions
- Prone Position
- Type
- Interventional
- Design
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 20 years and 80 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
In clinical field, Wison frame, chest rolls and Jackson table have been widely used for prone position surgery. Among those apparatus, Jackson table has padded supports under the chest and pelvis, so that the abdomen can hang freely and prevent the abdominal compression. By reducing abdominal and th...
In clinical field, Wison frame, chest rolls and Jackson table have been widely used for prone position surgery. Among those apparatus, Jackson table has padded supports under the chest and pelvis, so that the abdomen can hang freely and prevent the abdominal compression. By reducing abdominal and thoracic pressure, Jackson table would reduce blood loss, and less effects on pulmonary mechanics. But few studies has known to compare IAP with other positioning apparatus such as Wilson frame or chest roll.
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients who are scheduled for prone positioned spinal surgery
- ASA Physical Status Classification System class I or II
- Patients who are scheduled for prone positioned spinal surgery
- ASA Physical Status Classification System class I or II
Exclusion Criteria
- BMI > 30kg/m2
- Patients who did not insert urinary foley catheter
- Patients who did not agree
- ...
- BMI > 30kg/m2
- Patients who did not insert urinary foley catheter
- Patients who did not agree
- Patients who have COPD or emphysema
- Patients who have severe spine deformities such as scoliosis
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT02094976
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Study Director: Hee Pyung Park, MD PhD Professor Principal Investigator: Eugene Kim, MD Clinical Instuctor
- Study Director: Hee Pyung Park, MD PhD Professor Eugene Kim, MD Clinical Instuctor
Get Well Soon