Advanced Cardiac Imaging in Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

Summary

Participation Requirements

Description

Heart transplantation is a viable treatment option for select patients with end-stage heart failure, with 1-year survival rates for heart transplantation approximating 85%. Of those who survive the first year, >90% are alive at 5 years. In the early post-transplant period, rejection of the donor hea...

Heart transplantation is a viable treatment option for select patients with end-stage heart failure, with 1-year survival rates for heart transplantation approximating 85%. Of those who survive the first year, >90% are alive at 5 years. In the early post-transplant period, rejection of the donor heart due to activation of the recipients immune system, is the most worrisome complication and most common cause of morbidity and mortality. With time, the risk of rejection declines and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) represents the most common cause of heart failure and death in heart transplant recipients. CAV is a form of coronary artery disease in the transplanted heart. It develops due to a variety of immune and non-immune mediated mechanisms. It differs significantly from coronary artery disease in normal hearts, in that it affects arteries of all sizes (not just the main arteries visible by coronary angiography) and it involves thickening of the inner layer of the arteries, rather than the surface lining of the arteries as in traditional coronary artery disease. Early CAV is clinically silent. Patients are most often diagnosed by routine coronary angiographic surveillance (standard of care), or by declining heart function by surveillance imaging (standard of care), with no evidence of any organ rejection. Coronary angiography and assessment of heart function remain the cornerstone for diagnosis of CAV. The main limitation of angiography is its inability to identify mild or early disease, as an apparently normal angiogram can underestimate the presence of CAV. Intra-vascular ultrasound (IVUS) at coronary angiography has been evaluted as an adjunctive mordality for assessing and diagnosing early CAV. Certain IVUS parameters have been correlated with high risk for development of CAV and overall worse prognosis long term. Detection of CAV has important therapeutic and prognostic implications. Once detected by angiography, the likelihood of progression to severe CAV within 5 years is 19%. The overall likelihood of death or re-transplantation as a result of CAV is approximately 50% for severe CAV. Changes are made to medical therapy targeted at slowing or halting CAV progression and patients are evaluated for re-transplantation sooner rather than later, depending on the rate of progression. Currently, CAV is diagnosed by cardiac catheterization performed at routine intervals post transplant, with or without the use of IVUS. This is an invasive test with complications including bleeding, vascular damage, renal failure, stroke, heart attack or death. It has low sensitivity for identifying early CAV. Recent advances in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and cardiac CT imaging (CCT) present a unique opportunity to investigate these non-invasive modalities in CAV. To date, there are no studies in this field. We propose to evaluate whether functional CCT and/or CMR perfusion abnormalities, calcium scoring by CCT, and late gadolinium enhancement by CMR, is feasible in heart transplant patients and whether these modalities can detect abnormalities that correlate to cardiac catheterization results and detect early CAV before it becomes angiographically apparent. This pilot study will be the first of its kind in the heart transplant population. We aim to demonstrate feasibility and safety of CCT/CMR in heart transplant patients and correlate specific CMR/CCT abnormalities to established angiographic apparent CAV. This will allow further prospective evaluation of this exciting non-invasive modality in CAV detection with larger research studies by our group. The clinical implications are significant in that we may reduce the number of invasive procedures performed and identify CAV earlier, leading to the institution of earlier therapies, such as proliferation signal inhibitors, that may alter the natural history of this disease in effort to prolong the life of the transplanted heart. Specific Objectives: Primary Objectives: The number of patients with adverse events from CCT and CMR Determine recruitment rates for future studies, logistics of testing, and the ability to perform the tests Secondary Objectives: Describe the CCT and CMR imaging findings in CAV Identify and describe structural and functional CMR abnormalities in established angiographically apparent CAV using novel imaging protocols, including stress-rest perfusion imaging. Identify and describe structural and functional cardiac CT abnormalities in established angiographically apparent CAV using novel imaging protocols, including stress-rest perfusion imaging. Correlation between intimal thickening by IVUS imaging at cardiac catheterization and CCT/CMR perfusion abnormalities at one year post heart transplant. Correlation between CCT/CMR perfusion abnormalities at one year post heart transplant with the development of angiographically apparent CAV, graft dysfunction, cardiac adverse events, and overall survival long term, and compare CCT to CMR in this regard (Cohort 1 & 2 below) Study Design: Patients will be recruited into 1 of 3 cohorts from the heart transplant program at the QE II Health Science Center, Halifax Infirmary site, using a protocol approved by the institutional research ethics board. Eligible patients are those scheduled for routine invasive coronary angiography, > 18 years of age, > 12 months post-transplant and be able to undergo both CCT and CMR. Exclusion criteria include a creatinine clearance (CrCl) calculated < 45ml/min, contraindications or inability to administer intravenous beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers and standard contraindications to CMR, contrast media, and adenosine. Patients will be identified by Dr. Brian Clarke who is involved the care of all heart transplant patients at the QE II Health Science Centre Data will be analyzed as follows: Feasibility will be determined based on successful rate of recruitment and completion of CCT/CMR scans in cohort 3. Patients eligible for cohort 3 require the diagnosis of CAV 1 at any time point post-transplant. The attending transplant cardiologist involved makes this assessment. More advanced CAV is excluded. These patients will be analyzed without a comparator group. For CCT, calcium scoring, intimal thickening, and perfusion abnormalities will be described and analyzed for their correlation to angiographic findings. CMR imaging will describe late gadolinium enhancement, structural changes, and perfusion abnormalities and be analyzed for their correlation to angiographic findings. In a separate analysis, these patients will also be compared with those in cohort 2 to determine the non-invasive imaging differences between CAV1 and CAV0 patients. Cohort 1 will be analyzed separately; comparing those with MIT <0.5mm to those with MIT > 0.5mm for differences in CCT/CMR imaging and perfusion abnormalities. CCT will be compared with CMR in both MIT subgroups. We anticipate to identify perfusion abnormalities in the MIT > 0.5mm group and no perfusion abnormalities in the MIT < 0.5mm. Patients in cohort 1 will be followed long term for the development of angiographically apparent CAV, adverse cardiac events, graft dysfunction, and death. Results will be reported mainly in a descriptive manner, so that data will be summarized in percentage, mean or median, where applicable.

Tracking Information