300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

60 active trials for Urinary Tract Infections

Comparative Microbial Analysis of Cystitis in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Using Vikor Scientific Urine-ID Testing Menu (IDTM) and Standard Laboratory Culture

Vikor Scientific Urine-IDTM is a molecular analysis technology which provides pathogen detection, quantification, and resistance gene identification. Urine-IDTM delivers its results through the technology platform Antibiotic Stewardship program (ABXAssist™), which provides results incorporating regional sensitivity and susceptibility patterns, medication costs, antibiotic spectrum of activity, and FDA guidance. This product aims to deliver prompt, patient-centered and value-based guidance to clinicians for antibiotic selection within 24 hours of delivery to testing facility. Proposed advantages of Vikor Scientific Urine-IDTM include: Expeditious result (within 24 hours post-lab arrival) Simultaneous detection of polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections Identification of 49 most common antibiotic resistance genes Provision of up-to-date regional sensitivity and susceptibility patterns Provision of cost-sensitive treatment options and FDA guidance Easy accessibility (mobile, web-portal and electronic health records Integration) This utility of this technology has yet to be investigated in a clinical study and could prove to be a viable alternative or adjunctive diagnostic tool to standard laboratory culture. Standard laboratory culture can take up to 7 days to return pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility, potentially delaying appropriate care and prolonging exposure to inappropriate empiric antibiotics. Our study aims to analyze the ability Vikor Scientific Urine-IDTM to improve time to identification of correct pathogen and accuracy of pathogen identification when compared to standard laboratory culture.

Start: December 2021
Early vs Late Urinary Catheter Removal After Renal Transplantation

The purpose of this study is to compare frequency of UTI, urine leak and need for reoperation in patients after renal transplant with early or delayed Foley catheter removal. The hypothesis of the ELUCATR trial is that there is no need to keep Foley catheter longer than 24 hours after kidney transplant due to lack of significant effect on urological complications (urine leak, ureter strictures). Early removal can also reduce urinary tract infections. Main advantage of urinary catheter placement is continual diuresis monitoring and lower bladder pressure. Some hypothesize that increased pressure can disrupt ureteroneocystostomy with resultant urinary fistula. Clinical practice is to remove the catheter between 1-10 post-transplant day. Only few studies described removal of Foley catheter in the first 48 hours. There is no level 1 evidence for timing of urinary catheter removal after kidney transplantation. Urinary tract infection is a common complication after KTx occurring in about 7-80% patients. Studies suggest direct negative effect of UTI on long-term renal allograft function. There are several independent risk factors for developing UTI: female sex, diabetes and obesity. Duration of catheterization is a modifiable risk factor. Urine leak and ureter stenosis are relatively frequent surgical complications of kidney transplantation. Urine leaks occur in 2-9% of all kidney transplants. Most of them happen within 3 months after surgery. Urinary fistula contributes to mortality and graft loss. Majority of them need intervention with nephrostomy, pigtail ureteral stent or surgery. Anastomotic or ureter stenosis occurs in 3.1% of all kidney transplants and is usually resolved with open ureteroneocystostomy. Diagnosed and treated early, it does not affect patient and graft survival. There are no solid data documenting influence of the urinary bladder catheterization on fistulas, urinomas, ureter strictures and need for reoperation in this set of patients. European Best Renal Practice Guidelines recommend removal of the catheter as early as possible, however a randomized trial on timing and adverse event rates (urinary tract infection, urinary leakage) is needed.

Start: March 2019
Antimicrobial Stewardship in UTIs in Nursing Homes

Background: The widespread inappropriate use of antimicrobial substances drives resistance development at the individual and population level all over the world. In long-term care facilities (LTCF), antibiotics are among the most frequently prescribed medications. More than one third of antibiotics prescribed in LTCFs are for urinary tract infections (UTI). Studies have shown that 30 - 40% of antibiotic courses prescribed in LTCFs were unnecessary and that more than two-thirds were inappropriate based on society guidelines. Preliminary data: A surveillance study on healthcare-associated UTIs at LTCFs of the Geriatric Health Centers Graz revealed that guideline recommendations on antimicrobial choice were met in only 50% of patients. The most frequently used antimicrobial substances for UTI were quinolones. Aims: Using a multifaceted bundle of antimicrobial stewardship interventions consisting of clinical practice guidelines, care pathways and local as well as web-based education and training targeting nursing staff as well as physicians we aim to improve the quality of antimicrobial prescriptions for UTIs in four LTCFs in Graz, Austria. Design: Non-randomized cluster controlled intervention study. Setting: The Geriatric Health Centers Graz are a local institution comprising among others 4 LTCFs (total of 400 beds). These will serve as intervention group. Four LTCFs located in the surroundings of Graz will serve as control group. Intervention: The main components of the intervention are 1) two sessions of voluntary continuing medical education on the urinary tract infection program in each LTCF for physicians and nursing staff, 2) distribution of educations materials such as written guidelines on antibiotic prescribing including a smart phone friendly version, 3) implementation of the project homepage as a platform to distribute guidelines and educational videos and to enable physicians to ask questions which will be answered by an infectious disease physician. Outcomes: The primary outcome will be the proportion of adequate prescriptions (adequate in terms of antimicrobial choice). Secondary outcomes include proportion of adequate prescriptions (adequate in terms of decision to treat), number of cases with clinical failure, number of admissions to hospital due to UTI, number of adverse events attributed to antimicrobial treatment for UTI, percentage of extended spectrum betalactamase (ESBL) producing enterobacteria isolated from urinary cultures

Start: March 2021