Financial Incentives And Nurse Coaching to Enhance Diabetes Outcomes (FINANCE-DM)-1
The objective of this protocol is to answer the questions: 1) Are financial incentives layered upon nurse education and home telemonitoring superior to nurse education and home telemonitoring alone in improving metabolic control long term? 2) Are the effects of financial incentives on metabolic control sustained once the incentives are withdrawn? and 3) Are financial incentives efficacious within and consistent across racial/ethnic groups? This study provides a unique opportunity to address these gaps in the literature. Investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of a Financial Incentives And Nurse Coaching to Enhance Diabetes Outcomes (FINANCE-DM) intervention comprised of: 1) nurse education, 2) home telemonitoring, and 3) structured financial incentives; compared to an active control group (nurse education and home telemonitoring alone). The study also will evaluate whether intervention effects are sustained 6 months after the financial incentives are withdrawn (i.e. 18 months post randomization); and whether the intervention is differentially efficacious across racial/ethnic groups. Primary Aim 1: To test the efficacy of the FINANCE-DM Intervention on glycemic control at 12 months (long-term effect) and 18 months (sustainability effect) for Adults with poorly controlled T2DM (overall efficacy across combined racial/ethnic groups). Hypothesis 1: Patients randomized to FINANCE-DM intervention will have significantly greater improvements in glycemic control (HbA1c) at 12 months (long-term effect) and 18 months (sustainability effect) of follow-up compared to the active control group. Primary Aim 2: To test whether the effect of FINANCE-DM on glycemic control at 12 and 18 months is consistent across three racial/ethnic groups (Whites, AAs, HAs) and, if differential effect of the intervention is found, to estimate magnitude and direction of effect for the three racial/ethnic groups (efficacy within racial/ethnic groups). Hypothesis 2: While all racial/ethnic groups (Whites, AAs, HAs) will have greater improvements in glycemic control (HbA1c) at 12 months (long-term effect) and 18 months (sustainability effect) of follow-up compared to the active control group, the effect on the FINANCE-DM intervention will be significantly greater among ethnic minority patients (AAs and HAs) compared to Whites. Primary Aim 3: To determine the cost-effectiveness of the FINANCE-DM intervention. Hypothesis 3. The FINANCE-DM intervention will be more cost-effective in improving glycemic control (HbA1c) at 12 months (long-term effect) and 18 months (sustainability effect), compared to an active control group, as measured by differences in program costs and resource utilization. Secondary Aim: To test the efficacy of the FINANCE-DM intervention on secondary endpoints including BP, LDL, QOL and self-care behaviors (diet, exercise and medication adherence) at 12 and 18 months. Hypothesis 4: Patients randomized to the FINANCE-DM intervention will have significantly greater improvements in BP, LDL, QOL and self-care behaviors at 12 months (long-term effect) and 18 months (sustainability effect) of follow-up compared to an active control group.
Start: December 2019