300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

142 active trials for Tuberculosis

Paradoxical Tuberculosis Reactions in Patients Without HIV Infection

Background: Most people with tuberculosis (TB) feel better after starting treatment. But for some people, the opposite happens. They may feel better at first, but then suddenly get worse. This is a paradoxical reaction. Researchers want to better understand what causes this reaction and what happens after someone has it. Objective: To learn about paradoxical reactions to TB treatment. Eligibility: Adults 18 and older diagnosed with confirmed or suspected TB and currently on treatment for at least 2 weeks, with or without signs/symptoms of a paradoxical inflammatory reaction. Design: Participants will be screened with a physical exam and medical history. They will give blood and urine samples. Eligible participants will visit the NIH Clinical Center 3 times over 6 to 18 months. Each visit will take 7 hours to complete; visits may be scheduled over more than 1 day. Participants may have more visits if their TB symptoms change. Participants will give blood, urine, and sputum samples. They will have adverse event assessments. They will have 2 to 3 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans. PET/CT scans make pictures of the inside of the body. For this, participants will lie on a table that slides into a donut-shaped scanner. They will get a small amount of radioactive dye through an IV, which is a small plastic tube placed in a vein in the arm using a needle. Participants may have optional apheresis. For this, blood is taken from a needle in one arm. White blood cells are separated from the rest of the blood. The rest of the blood is returned through a needle in the other arm.

Start: December 2019
Patient Centered Intervention to Prevent Tuberculosis Among Children Under Five Years Old

Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) reduces the risk of tuberculosis in 60%. Young children are at higher risk of developing severe forms of TB, though this can be prevented with a full course of IPT. Preliminary data indicate that 60% of eligible children start IPT, and 30% complete it. Furthermore, children can be exposed to more than one case of TB in the household. Adults exposed to TB in the household setting are not necessarily aware of their risk. Uncertainties in the decisions of staff to prescribe IPT and limited health literacy among caretakers and families contribute to this. The investigators will determine the efficacy of an intervention package to increase IPT adherence and completion among children < 5 years old exposed to TB in the household. The investigators will assess the efficacy of the intervention by 1) measuring IPT completion at 6 months after treatment initiation and by 2) determining adherence to IPT by measuring isoniazid in urine at weeks 2, 8 and 24 in a random cluster sample of 10 health facilities and 20 control facilities with 10 children included in each facility (100 in intervention and 200 in control). The investigators will measure fidelity and reach, and acceptability among caretakers and health staff. The intervention package will consist of: 1) educational booklet for caretakers explaining why IPT needs to be given 2) a children's storybook, with weekly installments, over the 6-month course of IPT as a non-monetary incentive and 3) short messages services (SMS) reminders delivered to the caretaker for the weekly pick-up In September 2020, the protocol was updated to adapt to the COVID19 situation in Lima. One of the secondary outcome (isoniazid concentration in urine) was cancelled and the full intervention (educational booklet, weekly children storybook and weekly SMS) is now delivered through WhatsApp.

Start: December 2019
Community-based Tuberculosis Tracing and Preventive Therapy

The many gaps observed in the cascade of care of tuberculosis (TB) child contacts occur mostly in the screening, preventive therapy (PT) initiation and PT completion steps and the main drivers of these gaps are considered to be the health system infrastructure, limited worker resources and parents' reluctance to bring their children to the facility for screening. There would be great advantages of using a symptom-based screening at community level where only the symptomatic contacts are referred to hospital for further evaluation and asymptomatic contacts are started on PT in the community. Household or community-based screening is likely to improve the uptake and acceptability of child contact screening and management as well as adherence to PT and to reduce cost and workload at facility level. This study proposes to compare the cascade of care between two models for TB screening and management of household TB child contacts in two high TB burden and limited resource countries, Cameroon and Uganda. In the facility-based model, children will be screened at facility (Cameroon) or household level (Uganda) and preventive therapy initiation, refills of PT therapy and follow-up will be done at facility level. In the intervention group (community-based model), child contacts will be screened in the household by a community health worker (CHW). Those with symptoms suggestive of TB will be referred to the facility for TB investigations. Asymptomatic child contacts from high risk groups (under-5 years or HIV infected 5-14) will be initiated on PT (3 months isoniazid-rifampicin) in the household. Refills of PT therapy will also be done in the communities by the CHW. In both models, symptomatic children requiring further investigations for TB diagnosis will be referred to a health facility.

Start: October 2019
Dried Blood Spot Test to Assess TB in Pregnancy

Despite being a key contributor to maternal mortality in high-burden regions, TB in pregnancy is a hugely neglected area of global public health. During pregnancy, the symptoms of TB are often overlooked and undiagnosed because they are vague, non-specific, and can be very similar to common complaints during pregnancy. Women with TB in pregnancy are at an increased risk of anemia and perinatal death. The DROP-TB project aims to expand the tuberculosis (TB) detection testing in pregnancy by creating a system where blood samples are collected from women at their local healthcare clinics instead of/or at national-level TB diagnostic centres where visits can require substantial travel and cost. Blood samples collected in specific RNA stabilizing tubes and on specific storing paper filters are collected from pregnant women with presumptive TB and transported to a central TB testing facility and analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The DROP-TB method measures the mRNA expressions known to be markers of TB infection and disease. Based on veinous blood sampling, those signatures have showed high sensitivity (93%) and specificity (97%), can differentiate between active and latent infection, and performs well in the presence of other infections such as HIV. The DROP-TB program was specifically designed to increase the coverage of TB testing in pregnancy to improve health outcomes for women and their unborn children. The evidence generated from this program will demonstrate the feasibility of this program in providing TB diagnosis to women in rural and remote regions of LMIC with the example of Madagascar. Evidence will be presented to policy makers as a case to support the national scale up of the program in LMICs.

Start: June 2021
Pharmacokinetic Evaluation and Local Tolerability of Dry Powder Amikacin Via the Cyclops™

Rationale: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is defined as tuberculosis resistant to isoniazid and rifampicin. The incidence of MDR-TB worldwide is 3.9% for new cases and 21% for previously treated cases. However, the incidence of previously treated cases can rise to above 50% in eastern European countries. With increasing frequency of MDR-TB (and even extensively drug-resistant types), morbidity and mortality due to TB fail to decline worldwide. Amikacin, one of the drugs against MDR-TB, has the most potent effect when reaching a high peak serum concentration and this means that high doses have to be administered. Treatment with amikacin by inhalation would be a tremendous advantage due to the high local dose in the lungs, obtaining high local levels without the possible toxicity due to high serum levels. With the currently available inhalation techniques these local levels cannot be reached easily. In this protocol, the investigators will perform a pharmacokinetic and local tolerability study of dry powder amikacin using the Cyclops™ in patients with drug susceptible tuberculosis. Objective: primary objective is to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties of dry powder amikacin at different dosages and compare the peak serum values to a single i.v. dose. secondary objective is to assess the local tolerability of dry powder amikacin via the Cyclops™ at different dosages. Study design: single center, active control, ascending dose response study Study population: 8 patients with DSTB. Main study parameters/endpoints: the following pharmacokinetic parameters: actual dose (dose minus remainder in inhaler after inhalation), AUC0-24 (area under the curve from 0-24 h), Cmax (maximum serum concentration), Tmax (time to maximum serum concentration). For the local tolerability the following procedures will be done, drop of FEV1 of >15 % (lung function measurement) and any other reported adverse event are all considered critical to decide on proceeding into a phase 2B (and/or a phase 3) trial. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: All participants included in this study are patients with DSTB, who are admitted at the Tuberculosis Center Beatrixoord. They will receive 3 different doses of amikacin using the DPI with (at least) one week in between doses, they will also receive one dose of intravenous amikacin. Before using the dry powder inhaler (DPI) they will receive instructions and their inspiratory flow will be tested. Before each test dose an indwelling cannula will be inserted and before and after each test dose in total 9 blood samples will be collected. To investigate local tolerability, lung function tests will be performed and the occurrence of adverse events will be scored.

Start: June 2020
Transmission of Tuberculosis Among Illicit Drug Use Linkages

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading infectious disease killer globally and leading cause of death in persons with HIV. The most effective way to reduce TB incidence and mortality is to interrupt transmission. This requires finding and treating individuals with TB disease early, including those with subclinical disease. Molecular epidemiologic studies and mathematical models have shown that the primary approach to case finding-household contact tracing-identifies only 8-19% of transmissions in high TB and TB/HIV burden settings. Thus there is a clear need to identify new groups and settings where TB transmission occurs. Spatial clustering of individuals with higher rates of progression from infection to disease, such as those with HIV and malnourishment, can also form transmission hotspots. Illicit drug (i.e., methamphetamines, crack/cocaine, opiates) users have higher TB infection prevalence and disease incidence compared to non-users, likely due to significant within-group transmission and/or clustered vulnerability. Increased transmission among people who use illicit drugs (PWUD) could result from creation of more efficient TB transmitters, increased close contact among transmitters, increased rates of primary progression from infection to disease among contacts, or a combination. Interrogation of illicit drug user networks for TB transmission, therefore, holds great potential as a target for early case identification and linkage to treatment, with potential benefit for halting transmission to the broader population.

Start: April 2021
Community Initiated Preventive Therapy for TB

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends household contact investigation for new tuberculosis (TB) patients in low- and middle-income countries, with an emphasis on pediatric contacts. Although the aim of this policy is to find previously undetected TB patients and reduce transmission, such investigations represent a missed opportunity to start contacts without TB on preventive therapy (TPT). The WHO guidelines do not address the optimal implementation of contact investigation. The standard of care (SOC) in most settings, passive referral of pediatric contacts to the clinic by the index TB patient, has largely remained unsuccessful in practice. In 2017, the WHO estimated only 23% of eligible child contacts were started on TB preventive therapy. Household contact investigation has been shown to have a higher yield in active TB case finding, but is labor intensive, and may be challenging to implement in densely populated urban settings or informal settlements/slums. The WHO recently endorsed the use of a new TPT regimen (rifapentine and isoniazid weekly (3HP)) for both children and adults in high burden settings, and the programmatic roll out of this regimen offers the opportunity to simultaneously examine new strategies to improve the identification and treatment of pediatric TB household contacts. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of community-based versus facility-based child contact investigation and delivery of TB preventive care to inform the optimal implementation strategy for investigating pediatric household TB contacts. Study Design: Cluster-randomized trial in 32 clinics (16 clinics per arm) divided equally among South Africa and Ethiopia (8 clinics per arm per country). Methods: Newly diagnosed qualifying TB index patients (determined by South African or Ethiopian National TB guidelines) and participants' household child contacts will be recruited to participate. Local staff, including the relevant nurses and community health workers in the intervention and control clinics, will be trained to conduct contact investigation with a symptom-based approach for all child contacts under 15 years old in home and at the clinic. Data will be collected using routine medical files and then retrospectively abstracted by the research team. Thirty-two primary health clinics will be stratified (by TB case notification and by country) and randomized in 1:1 fashion to either community-based or facility-based delivery of care. Household child contacts under 15 years of age who screen negative for TB disease will be initiated on TPT by a healthcare worker (nurse, community health worker, etc.) either in the home or clinic setting. Children in the intervention arm who screen positive will first be sent to the nurse at the clinic for repeat screening. Children who have a persistently positive screen in the intervention arm and those with a positive screen in the control arm using South Africa's or Ethiopia's pediatric symptom screening tool will be referred to a physician at the district hospital for further investigation of TB disease, as is the standard of care in both settings. Investigators will compare clinic-level outcomes including proportion of household TB contacts under 15 years of age that were screened, initiated on TPT, and who completed TPT, and reasons for not completing TPT including loss to follow up and incident TB disease while on TPT.

Start: July 2021