300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

401 active trials for Surgery

Comparison of Surgery and Active Surveillance in the Treatment of Bosniak III Renal Cysts

The incidence of renal cysts is rising due to increased abdominal imaging. Renal complicated cysts have been traditionally classified according to the Bosniak classification, which distinguishes cystic masses by specific features of walls and septa. The categories I and II are benign and class IIF most probably benign but needs a short radiological follow-up. Categories III and IV have been traditionally operated due to the increased risk of renal cell carcinoma. However, recently published studies show that approximately 50% of the operated Bosniak III cystic masses are benign, which means that half of the cases are overtreated by surgery. It has also been shown that surgical pathology of stable Bosniak IIF cysts is malignant in less than 1%, while the cysts, which are upgraded to higher Bosniak classes will show malignant surgical pathology in 85%. So far, there is lack of prospective data on active surveillance in Bosniak III cystic masses. The aim of the study is to compare active surveillance and surgery in patients with Bosniak III renal cystic masses. Patients will be randomized in active surveillance or immediate surgical excision of a cystic mass. In the active surveillance group, patients are followed according to the study protocol for 10 years and treated with delayed surgery if the cystic mass upgrades into Bosniak IV/solid, becomes symptomatic or grows over a preclassified threshold. The primary objective is to compare surgical pathology between patients treated with immediate surgery versus delayed surgery. According to recent retrospective data, active surveillance of Bosniak III cystic masses is reasonable and oncologically safe. Therefore a prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to get high level evidence to support a change in the treatment strategy. The study may significantly reduce unnecessary operations performed in patients with Bosniak III cystic masses.

Start: March 2021
Clinical Study Evaluating the Proper Surgical Safety Margin for Early Stage Oral Tongue Cancers

A prospective multicenter randomized non-inferiority clinical trial, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1.0 cm-safety margin surgery, compared with 1.5 cm safety margin surgery for cT1-2N0 oral tongue cancer Summary: A current standard primary treatment for oral tongue cancer is a curative surgical resection with/without adjuvant radiation treatments (or chemoradiation). In pathological analysis of surgical specimens, more than 5 mm of non-tumorous tissues from the tumor border is regarded as a safe negative resection margin, according to the NCCN guideline (the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Dec 10. 2020). To achieve this clear margin, surgeons are apt to use a 1.0 to 1.5 cm safety margin around the gross tumor during surgery, considering 30-50% tumor shrinkage in tissue fixation process. Many previous retrospective data have been reported to suggest the optimal or proper surgical extent for oral tongue cancer. Wider resection can lead to better local control, however, it sacrifices more normal tissue, resulting in the functional deficit of tongue (speech and swallowing), even with reconstruction. Unfortunately up to now, no prospective comparison of a different surgical safety margin for oral tongue cancer have been conducted to draw a more solid conclusion. Particularly in early stage oral tongue cancer (cT1-2N0), some study results have suggested that less than 5 mm resection margin in pathology specimens can be also safe and effective in terms of tumor control. To achieve a well-grounded result about the proper surgical safety margin in early stage (cT1-2N0) oral tongue cancer, we will compare the outcomes of the two (1.5 cm versus 1.0 cm) surgical safety margin in curative resection for cT1-2N0 oral tongue cancer.

Start: January 2021
Arthroscopic Versus Open Brostrom for Ankle Instability

Background: Ankle sprains are among the most prevalent lesions in primary care. A substantial number of these ligament lesions will develop ankle instability and require a surgical procedure. The Brostrom-Gould technique is the standard surgical approach for this condition, providing excellent results over the years. Thru the last decades, the arthroscopic Brostrom has gain popularity and support by several studies. Yet, there is no consensus regarding the best procedure to treat ankle instability nowadays. Hypothesis: The arthroscopic Brostrom technique will present better levels of pain and function when compared to the standard open approach. Design: blinded, in parallel groups, multicentric, randomized, clinical trial. Materials and Methods: 98 patients with a diagnosis of chronic ankle instability, referred from primary or secondary health care services, will be assessed and enrolled in this study. Participants will be divided in two groups (randomized by sequentially numbered identical envelopes, which will be administered serially to participants), one containing the open Brostrom repair technique and the other comprehending the arthroscopic Brostrom approach. The assessments will occur in 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks. Patients will be evaluated primarily by complications and secondarily the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Foot Function Index (FFI) and the 36 Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The investigators will use Comparison of Two Proportions via relative frequency analysis, the Pearson Correlation the Chi-Square test and the ANOVA for statistical analyses. Discussion: This study intends to establish if the arthroscopic Brostrom technique can produce excellent and reliable results when treating chronic ankle instability. A shorter surgical time, a better cosmetic appearance and a smaller soft tissue injury would support the choice for this procedure if the outcomes could be compared to the open approach.

Start: June 2019
Impact of Moderate to Severe Pain in the Post-intervention Monitoring Room After Hemorrhoidectomy on the Length of Stay in the Outpatient Surgery Unit

The target rate for outpatient surgery has been set by the Ministry of Health at 70% for 2020. To achieve this objective, this requires increasing the panel of eligible outpatient procedures to more mutilating surgeries and usually performed in conventional hospitalization. This switch from conventional hospitalization to an outpatient stay increases the risk of converting stays into unscheduled hospitalization. Postoperative pain is one of the main factors in converting outpatient stays. Poor control is associated with increased length of stay, and unscheduled consultations and readmissions. In addition, the increased time spent with severe pain during the first 24 hours postoperatively is a risk factor for chronicization. Proctology, and, in particular, hemorrhoidal surgery is the perfect example. Outpatient management of open pedicle hemorrhoidectomy is increasing year by year, but the rate of conversion to unscheduled hospitalizations remains high. Urine retention, postoperative hemorrhage and poor pain control are the main causes. Within the Paris Saint Joseph Hospital Group, hemorrhoidal surgery has the highest rate of conversions from hospitalization to proctology (8% in 2019), despite the implementation since 2015 of a dedicated, developed according to the current recommendations of the SNFCP. The pain after hemorrhoidal surgery is always severe in the absence of analgesics and appears upon arrival in the post-interventional monitoring room (SSPI). Despite the administration of analgesics or the implementation of locoregional analgesia techniques (pudendal block), moderate to severe pain is frequently observed in the post-intervention monitoring room. In the medical literature, there is little data evaluating the means of management of postoperative pain in this surgery, and even less the effect of the different associations. Retrospectively and, from the data collected in our information systems, we wish to assess the impact on the length of stay of the presence of moderate to severe pain in the IPSS after a two-way or tri-pedicle hemorrhoidal surgery open on our cohort of patients operated in outpatient surgery. Our hypothesis is that the presence of moderate to severe pain in PPSS increases the total length of stay, placing the patient at an increased risk of conversion. The purpose of our study is also to identify predictive factors (aggravating or protective) of the onset of moderate to severe pain immediately after surgery, in order to establish a strategy to limit its frequency.

Start: October 2020