300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

86 active trials for Stroke Ischemic

Multicenter Study on the Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Post-stroke Motor Recovery

Several previous studies have used tDCS as a neuromodulation tool, showing improvements in several diseases (Lefaucheur et al., 2017). Based on these observations, it is believed that the use of tDCS in combination with specific motor training may provide the opportunity to induce behavioral improvements in patients with motor deficits. As shown in previous reports brain stimulation can, in fact, interact with the intrinsic ability of the brain to "repair" damaged brain functions, increasing the involvement of compensatory functional networks and thus inducing neuroplasticity. If these low-cost, easy-to-use stimulation techniques prove to be useful in improving motor deficits with long-term effects, the current study would open up new and interesting avenues in the field of neurorehabilitation. Given the potential long-lasting effects of tDCS, there is currently a growing interest in the clinical sector with the aim to reduce motor deficits in patients with brain injury. The most widely used protocols in stroke patients include the application of either anodal on the hypsilesional hemisphere or cathodal tDCS on the unaffected hemisphere (contralateral), so as to increase and decrease the excitability of the motor cortex, respectively (Nitsche and Paulus, 2001). The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation in enhancing the functional recovery of the upper limb of stroke patients after three weeks of neuromotor training and subsequent follow-up. The secondary objective is to evaluate the treatment effects on balance, gait, motor dexterity and disability, besides the functional recovery of the lower limb.

Start: October 2019
EMPOWER-1: A Multi-site Clinical Cohort Research Study to Reduce Health Inequality

Health inequality and genetic disparity are a significant issue in the United Kingdom (UK). This study focuses on diseases that are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the UK, and specifically examines the extent and basis of treatment failure in different patient populations. The vast majority of drug registration clinical trials have under-representation of ethnic minority populations. In addition, the wider Caucasian populations have reasonably different clinical characteristics to the population that participated in the drug licencing clinical trials. A consequence of this is that drugs are licensed for use in real-world general patient populations where the clinical trial results are simply not statistically significant to specifically demonstrate efficacy or safety in populations that were either absent or under-represented in the drug registration clinical trials. When these facts are considered alongside data that supports significant under-reporting of adverse events in the real-world setting within the UK (and globally, e.g the USA and Europe), it highlights that pharmacovigilance systems are unable to capture drug effectiveness and safety data in a manner that can reasonably assure appropriate prescribing in the wider patient populations. This large real-world research study aims to identify whether commonly prescribed drugs are effective in treating illnesses that cause significant poor health and death in the different patient populations that represent the UK. The goal of this study is to generate large quantitative data-sets that may inform clinical practice to reduce the existing health inequality and genetic disparity in the UK.

Start: February 2020
Use of Oral Anticoagulants and Symptoms in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Örebro County

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia and the number of patients with AF is expected to increase substantially in the coming decades. AF affects approximately 3% of adults aged 20 years or older in Western countries with the prevalence increasing further with age and risk factor such as hypertension, structural heart disease, obesity, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The presence of AF is independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and morbidity, largely due to stroke and heart failure, dementia and impaired health-related quality of life. The management of AF aims to reduce symptoms, improve quality of life and prevent AF-related complications. About one third of AF patients do not have any perceived AF-associated symptoms, silent AF, but up to one fourth of patients report severe symptoms. Patients with silent AF are still at risk for complications. Systemic embolization, particularly stroke, is the most frequent major complication of AF. Untreated AF, confers to a four- to fivefold increased risk of stroke compared to the general population. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy can prevent the majority of ischaemic strokes in AF patients. The stroke risk in AF patients is commonly estimated using the CHA2DS2-VASc score and OAC therapy is recommended for men with a score of 2 or more, and for women with a score of 3 or more, and should be considered for men with a score of 1 and women with a score of 2. Interventional left atrial appendage occlusion may be considered in patients with a high risk of stroke, but with contraindications for long-term OAC therapy. Although OAC therapy is superior to no treatment or aspirin, underuse or premature termination of OAC therapy, especially in older people, is probably common. The stroke risk without OAC often exceeds the bleeding risk on OAC, even in the elderly, in patient with dementia and in patients with frequent falls. The bleeding risk on aspirin is increased without preventing stroke and should be avoided according to current guidelines. This study aims to determine the prevalence of patients with AF in Örebro County, to describe the prescribing of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in relation to stroke risk and to initiate OAC therapy or left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with a high risk for stroke, and to evaluate symptoms of AF in a general AF population. A retrospective cohort study design will be used. Patients aged 20 years or older with a diagnosis of AF from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2018 will be identified from the National Patient Register, that covers all in-patient and outpatient physician visits from both private and public caregivers, and the Medrave 4 that is used in all public general practices. Both patients with first diagnosed AF and previously known AF will be included. OAC therapy will be defined as an active prescription issued for an OAC on 31 December 2019. Patients' records will be review for type of AF (paroxysmal, persistent or permanent AF), age, sex, comorbidities, medications, pacemaker or implantable defibrillator and prior catheter ablation. Prior OAC therapy and reason for discontinuing/ initiating treatment will be documented. Patients with a high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc of 2 or more in men and of 3 or more in women, or one point or more for age in both men and women), will be offered a clinical visit to an experienced physician at the Department of cardiology to assess stroke and bleeding risk and to possibly initiate OAC therapy or refer the patient for left atrial appendage occlusion. The study period will run from 2 September 2019 to 29 May 2020. All patients with a diagnosis of AF will also be administered an AF-specific questionnaire (AF6) to assess AF-specific symptoms in a general population.

Start: September 2019