300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

193 active trials for Smoking Cessation

Cytisine Compared to Combination NRT in Relapsed Smokers

Cigarette smoking causes cardiovascular disease (CVD) yet many smokers with CVD are unable to quit despite strong desire to do so. Within 90 days of discharge, about 30% of smokers have returned to daily smoking and almost 60% have relapsed by 1 year. Patients with CVD who resume smoking are more likely to experience new events (e.g. heart attack or stroke) or die. New approaches are required. A new type of cessation product is a plant-based medication called Cytisine. Cytisine is taken orally over 25 days and reduces the pleasurable sensations that smokers get from cigarettes and reduces withdrawal symptoms. The primary research question is whether or not it is feasible to conduct a large-scale trial of the effectiveness of this product compared to conventional nicotine replacement therapy in smokers who have failed to quit using conventional methods. To determine feasibility, a pilot study will be conducted of sixty smokers (30 men, 30 women) with CVD who have been treated for smoking cessation but have relapsed within 90 days of discharge. Participants will complete a baseline assessment and will be randomly assigned to either the combination nicotine replacement therapy group (patch plus lozenge) or cytisine group. Participants will be treated for 25 days and then will return to UOHI so adherence to treatment and smoking status can be assessed. Feasibility of the larger trial will be based on: the recruitment rates; adherence to assigned treatments; dropout rates; and differences in 25-day quit rates between groups.

Start: September 2020
PRogetto Salute Parma

This project from the University Hospital of Parma (AOUPR) aims to verify the feasibility of a prevention program in our district, relying on advanced technological resources and highly experienced team in lung cancer early diagnosis, in order to identify useful elements towards the applicability of such a prevention program on a large scale (regional, national). Uncontrolled, monocentric experimental study with dynamic enrollment and prospective data collection, aimed at implementing a prevention program based on scientific evidence. This study is set to verify the applicability and feasibility of a lung cancer prevention program in a real context, including a preliminary evaluation at the smoking cessation clinic and a LDCT assessment with subsequent LDCT follow-up for participants who show indeterminate findings at the first LDCT (LDCT baseline) exam. The main objective of the study is to verify the feasibility of a lung cancer prevention program according to internationally validated scientific methods. Secondary objectives: To evaluate the use of local smoking cessation clinics and their effects in terms of smoking cessation (primary prevention) To evaluate the outcomes of the program in terms of number of patients with early (presymptomatic) lung cancer treated with minimally invasive surgery (secondary prevention) To evaluate the number of false positives and their diagnostic work-up (PET-CT, CT-guided biopsy, bronchoscopy) Primary endpoint: - Percentage of enrolled subjects to whom the program was offered within 60 days from the date of enrolment and percentage of those who stop smoking for at least 12 months Secondary endpoints: To describe the organizational model, human resources employed, difficulties encountered and elements that have favoured its realization To measure the variation in smoking habits in enrolled smokers To describe the effect of annual LDCT on lung cancer diagnosis rates, considering size, shape, histology and site To measure the consequent demand for further diagnostic investigations and treatment To measure the number of false positives Subjects at high risk of lung cancer screened by the medical team of the AOUPR or by GPs to join the prevention program. Inclusion criteria Age between 50 and 75 years Equivalent tobacco intoxication of ? 15 cigarettes per day for ?25 years or ? 10 cigarettes per day for ?30 years Status of current smoker or ex-smoker for <10 years. Exclusion criteria • Personal history of cancer within the prior 5 years We expect to recruit around 500 people in 1 year. This sample size is considered adequate based on the available resources, both human and economic. After closing and adjusting the database and before data analysis, a document called Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) will be drawn up. It will consist of the following paragraphs: Statistical methods planned in the study protocol; Size of the sample; Management of missing data; Evaluation of the endpoints; Statistical models that will be applied in the analysis. The socio-demographic characteristics of the enrolled subjects, the adopted organizational methods and the effects of the prevention program (endpoints) will be analyzed and described using tables and figures. The project "PRogetto Salute Parma: Primary and secondary prevention of smoking-related lung cancer" will be started once approved by the institutional Ethics Committee and authorized by the General Manager. The study is expected to be carried out over 2 years (from the inclusion of the first subject), with an expected period of 1 year for the enrolment and 1 further year for follow-up.

Start: February 2020
Randomized Trial of Electronic Cigarettes With or Without Nicotine in Smoking Cessation.

Background: Electronic cigarettes (EC) mainly containing nicotine (88-95 % of users) are widely and growingly used worldwide. It is estimated that there were 1.7 million daily users in France in 2016. Although the number of publications about its use is increasing exponentially, there are no evidence based, unbiased, head-to-head comparison data about its efficacy as an aid to smoking cessation. As of today, only two head-to-head randomized studies have been published, both reported negative results at the main endpoint but they used first and second generation EC delivering nicotine with low or unknown bioavailability. Recent EC deliver nicotine with largely improved bioavailability. One of the randomized studies compared EC with and without nicotine to nicotine patch and reported similar smoking cessation rate at main outcome. However, there is no published, double blind study comparing EC use with a well-studied, licensed smoking cessation medication. Superiority of EC with nicotine compared to EC without nicotine and to a reference smoking cessation medication while collecting also straightforward information about safety, would allow proposing EC with nicotine to the large population of smokers who intend to quit and situate it among the approved smoking cessation treatments. The clinical study's hypothesis: EC containing nicotine can be considered as a nicotine replacement therapy having, probably, a better bioavailability of nicotine than the marketed pharmaceutical NRTs, first line medications of smoking cessation. It is therefore of interest to compare EC containing nicotine to EC without nicotine but also to a reference medication with demonstrated efficacy in smoking cessation. We hypothesize that EC with nicotine provides a higher smoking abstinence rate than EC without nicotine and may be as good as varenicline, our reference medication.

Start: October 2018