300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

135 active trials for Septic Shock

Endotoxins and Cytokines Removal During Continuous Hemofiltration With oXiris™

Sepsis is a major cause of death in Intensive Care Units and therefore finding new therapies to improve survival rates and limit morbidity is a major goal. Over the past decades, blood purification has been proposed as an adjuvant therapy for sepsis. The goal of blood purification is to restore the immune homeostasis and efficiency through the removal of bacterial products including endotoxins, broad-spectrum cytokines and other inflammatory mediators. Indeed, the large and overwhelmed release of these mediators in the early phase of sepsis may induce multiple organ failure syndrome. In 2017, different techniques are proposed for blood purification. Among them, the highly adsorptive membrane, oXiris™, seems promising. This membrane can be used in case of Acute Kidney Injury associated with sepsis and exhibits enhanced blood purification capacities. Previous studies on animals have already proven that this membrane can remove broad-spectrum cytokines but also endotoxins from the blood. This ability to remove endotoxins is particularly interesting since endotoxins are believed to be the trigger of the immune cascade at the initiation of sepsis. The lack of clinical evidence is the main limit to a wider use of this membrane. Therefore, the aim of the present clinical trial is to characterize the blood purification properties of the membrane in a human clinical setting. The oXiris™ membrane is specifically designed to improve the adsorptive capacities of the polyacrylonitrile-based AN69 membrane. Its extremely rich coating of polyethyleneimine (PEI) gives the membrane the ability to bind and remove not only cytokines but also endotoxins due to the positive charges of PEI at the surface of the membrane. The tested hypothesis is that the oXiris™ filter allows for a greater endotoxin and cytokine removal compared to a standard polysulfone ("PrismafleX HF1400") filter in patients with septic shock.

Start: December 2018
Assessment of Pleotropic Effect of Heparin Infusion Versus Subcutaneous Injection in Septic Shock Patients

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT), is a common and severe complication of critical illness. Critically ill patients are at high risk of VTE because they combine both general risk factors together with specific ICU risk factors of VTE.Vasopressor administration was found to be an independent risk factor for DVT. certainly explained by reduced absorption of subcutaneous heparin linked to the vasoconstriction of peripheral blood vessels. Critically ill patients, due to altered pharmacokinetics behavior of unfractionated heparin, continuous intravenous infusion of the low doses of unfractionated heparin has been proposed. Standard prophylaxis with subcutaneous (SC) heparin is less efficient in patients requiring vasopressors .Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response due to an infection. Both inflammatory mediators and coagulation are involved in sepsis. the release of the inflammatory mediators such as interleukins and tumor necrosis factor cause damage of the endothelium and activation of coagulation which promotes inflammatory process .Unfractionated heparin is the most negatively charged biological molecule known, heparin has a strong ability to interfere with the functioning of positively charged molecules. Due to the difference in charges, heparin has been documented to interact with over 100 proteins.57 Interleukins, cytokines, and receptors located on endothelial cells, which are involved in the acute phase response, are positively charged, and thus are a reasonable target for the modulating effects of heparin. Heparin has strong anti-inflammatory effects with many possible mechanisms, including binding to cell-surface glycosaminoglycan's, preventing leukocyte migration, direct binding to chemokines and cytokines, and inhibition of intracellular NF-kB .

Start: July 2020
Albumin Replacement Therapy in Septic Shock

Albumin is a key regulator of fluid distribution within the extracellular space and possesses several properties beyond its oncotic activity, including binding and transport of several endogenous molecules, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant actions, nitric oxide modulation, and buffer function. The accumulating evidence suggests that supplementation of albumin may provide survival advantages only when the insult is severe as in patients with septic shock. Prospective randomized trials on the possible impact of albumin replacement in these patients with septic shock are lacking. The aim of the study is to investigate whether the replacement with albumin and the maintenance of its serum levels at least at 30 g/l for 28 days improve survival in patients with septic shock compared to resuscitation and volume maintenance without albumin. In this prospective, multicenter, randomised trial, adult patients (?18 years) with septic shock will be randomly assigned within a maximum of 24 hours after the onset of septic shock after obtaining informed consents to treatment or control groups. Patients assigned to the treatment group will receive a 60 g loading dose of human albumin 20% over 2-3 hours. Serum albumin levels will be maintained at least at 30 g/l in the ICU for a maximum of 28 days following randomization using 40-80 g human albumin 20% infusion. The control group will be treated according to the usual practice with crystalloids as the first choice for the resuscitation and maintenance phase of septic shock. The primary end point is 90 days mortality and secondary end points include 28-day, 60-day, ICU, and in-hospital mortality, organ dysfunction/failure, and length of ICU and hospital stay. In total 1412 patients need to be analyzed, 706 per group. Assuming a dropout rate of 15%, a total of 1662 patients need to be allocated.

Start: October 2019
Carotid Doppler and EEOT for Fluid Responsiveness Prediction

Fluid responsiveness prediction prior to fluid challenge administration is a topic of interest, which has been extensively investigated, but remains challenging. In clinical practice, functional hemodynamic tests (FHT) consisting of maneuvers that affect cardiac function and/or heart-lung interaction, have been introduced in order to identify fluid responders and non-responders without fluid challenge administration. Changes in cardiac output induced by the Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test reliably predicted the increase in cardiac output to volume expansion. New approaches have been recently developed based on changes in respiratory dynamics, such as a transient increase in tidal volume, or a lung recruitment maneuver or an end-expiratory occlusion (EEO) test. The EEO leaded to an increase in venous return, cardiac preload and stroke volume in preload-responsive patients. The authors found that an increase in cardiac output ? 5% during a 15-s EEO reliably predicted its response to a 500-ml saline infusion. However, in order to identify the rapid and transient increase in cardiac index during the EEO, continuous and instantaneous cardiac output monitoring is necessary. Pulse contour analysis methods provide a beat-to-beat estimation of cardiac output and had been used in most of studies validating the EEO test. Carotid doppler is a non-invasive, bedside, easy to use ultrasound technique that measuring blood flow peak velocity (CDPV) and duration of systolic component of each cardiac cycle (from the onset to dicrotic notch- Flow time - FT) allows a reliable estimation of fluid status and could be an interesting alternative to track changes in SV and cardiac output.

Start: January 2019
European/Euro-ELSO Survey on Adult and Neonatal/ Pediatric COVID-19 Patients in ECMO

In the last 10 years, severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) was responsible of multiple outbreaks putting a strain on the public health worldwide. Indeed, SARI had a relevant role in the development of pandemic and epidemic with terrible consequences such as the 2009 H1N1 pandemic which led to more than 200.000 respiratory deaths globally. In late December 2019, in Wuhan, Hubei, China, a new respiratory syndrome emerged with clinical signs of viral pneumonia and person-to-person transmission. Tests showed the appearance of a novel coronavirus, namely the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Two other strains, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) have caused severe respiratory illnesses, sometimes fatal. In particular, the mortality rate associated with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, was of 10% and 37% respectively. Even though COVID-19 appeared from the first time in China, quickly it spread worldwide and cases have been described in other countries such as Thailand, Japan, South Korea, Germany, Italy, France, Iran, USA and many other countries. An early paper reported 41 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection in Wuhan. The median age of the patients was 49 years and mostly men (73%). Among those, 32% were admitted to the ICU because of the severe hypoxemia. The most associated comorbidities were diabetes (20%), hypertension (15%), and cardiovascular diseases (15%). On admission, 98% of the patients had bilateral multiple lobular and sub-segmental areas of consolidation. Importantly, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developed in 29% of the patients, while acute cardiac injury in 12%, and secondary infection in 10%. Invasive mechanical ventilation was required in 10% of those patients, and two of these patients (5%) had refractory hypoxemia and received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In a later retrospective report by Wang and collaborators, clinical characteristics of 138 patients with COVID-19 infection were described. ICU admission was required in 26.1% of the patients for acute respiratory distress syndrome (61.1%), arrhythmia (44.4%), and shock (30.6%). ECMO support was needed in 11% of the patients admitted to the ICU. During the period of follow-up, overall mortality was 4.3%. The use of ECMO in COVID-19 infection is increasing due to the high transmission rate of the infection and the respiratory-related mortality. Therefore, the investigators believe that ECMO in case of severe interstitial pneumonia caused by COVID could represent a valid solution in order to avoid lung injuries related to prolonged treatment with non-invasive and invasive mechanical ventilation. In addition, ECMO could have a role for the systemic complications such as septic and cardiogenic shock as well myocarditis scenarios. Potential clinical effects and outcomes of the ECMO support in the novel coronavirus pandemic will be recorded and analyzed in our project. The researchers hypothesize that a significant percentage of patients with COVID-19 infection will require the utilize of ECMO for refactory hypoxemia, cardiogenic shock or septic shock. This study seeks to prove this hypothesis by conducting an observational retrospective/prospective study of patients in the ICU who underwent ECMO support and describe clinical features, severity of pulmonary dysfunction and risk factors of COVID-patients who need ECMO support, the incidence of ECMO use, ECMO technical characteristics, duration of ECMO, complications and outcomes of COVID-patients requiring ECMO support.

Start: April 2020