300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

135 active trials for Septic Shock

Randomized Pilot Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation as an Adjuvant Treatment in Patients With Sepsis in Intensive Care.

Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death in intensive care. About 50% of patients with septic shock die after 1 year; and 50% of survivors suffer from cognitive decline (Singer et al., 2016). The pathophysiological mechanisms of serious complications of sepsis are now well known. In fact, the systemic inflammation related to sepsis amplifies the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and neurotoxic mediators, hence an increase in deleterious phenomena such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, endothelial activation, disruption of the blood-brain barrier, neuroinflammation (astrocytic and microglial activation) leading to multi-organ failure which compromises the patient's vital and functional prognosis (Eidelman et al., 1996, Annane and Sharshar, 2015). Although there has been progress in the understanding of its pathophysiology, the management of sepsis and septic shock in intensive care relies mainly on anti-infective treatments and the restoration of cardiovascular and respiratory functions (Dellinger et al., 2013). There is virtually no adjuvant therapy for the management of sepsis (Annane, 2016a, Annane et al., 2016), apart from a few hormonal therapies such as insulin to maintain blood glucose levels below 180 mg / dL and low doses of corticosteroids and vasopressin. There is therefore a pressing need to develop innovative treatments targeting inflammatory and immunological processes in order to reduce the complications of sepsis and improve patient prognosis. Some recent work has shown that electrical vagus nerve stimulation (SNV), a technique used for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy, can modulate inflammatory and immune responses and control inflammation syndrome in animal models of sepsis, arthritis and rheumatism in humans (Meneses et al., 2016; Koopman et al., 2016). In this pilot study we plan to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous (non-invasive) SNV as an adjuvant treatment in patients with sepsis in intensive care.

Start: February 2021
Evaluation of the Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Phenylephrine Response During Refractory Septic Shock

Septic shock is common in patients admitted to intensive care and hospital mortality occurs in close to 50% of these patients. In half of the cases, death occurs within the first 72 hours in a context of multiple organ failure that does not respond to conventional therapies, particularly circulatory therapies, despite increasing doses of catecholamines. Vasopressor resistance in septic patients defines refractory septic shock. In one study (Conrad et al. 2015), the increase in blood pressure observed with an infusion of increasing doses of phenylephrine (dose-response curve) made it possible to quickly and clearly identify patients resistant to vasopressors at a high risk of death by refractory shock (ROC AUC 0.92). This resistance is due in particular to a downregulation of ?1 adrenergic receptors, linked to sympathetic hyper activation associated with septic shock. To date, there is no validated therapy in this situation. However, experimental data have shown that the administration of ?2 agonists, usually used for their sedative (dexmedetomidine) or anti-hypertensive (clonidine) effect, normalizes sympathetic activity towards basal values. In animals, ?2 agonists restore the sensitivity of alpha1 adrenergic receptors, resulting in improved vasopressor sensitivity and survival. In humans, a beneficial effect on mortality was suggested in the first trial testing dexmedetomidine in septic patients in 2017. This effect was observed especially in the most severe patients, suggesting a restoration of sensitivity to vasopressors. The hypothesis is that the administration of dexmedetomidine in patients in refractory septic shock may improve response to phenylephrine and decrease resistance to vasopressors. This pilot study could lay the foundation for a randomized controlled trial.

Start: October 2019
Septic Shock-induced Immunosuppression

Septic syndromes are a major although largely under-recognized health care problem and represent the first cause of mortality in intensive care units (ICU). While it has long been known that sepsis deeply perturbs immune homeostasis by inducing a tremendous systemic inflammatory response, novel findings indicate that sepsis indeed initiates a more complex immune response that varies over time, with the concomitant occurrence of both pro- and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. As a resultant, after a short pro-inflammatory phase, septic patients enter a stage of protracted immunosuppression. This is illustrated in those patients by reactivation of dormant viruses (cytomegalovirus (CMV) or Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)) or infections due to pathogens, including fungi, which are normally pathogenic solely in immunocompromised hosts. These alterations might be directly responsible for worsening outcome in patients who survived initial resuscitation as nearly all immune functions are deeply compromised. New promising therapeutic strategies are currently emerging from those recent findings such as adjunctive immunostimulation for the most immunosuppressed patients. The prerequisite for immunostimulation administration (Interferon gama (IFNg), Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF), interleukin 7 (IL-7)) however relies on clinicians' capacity to identify patients who could benefit the most from these immunoadjuvant therapies, as there is no clinical sign of immune dysfunctions. In this context, the main objectives of IMMUNOSEPSIS 4 study are: to identify the best biomarkers for sepsis-induced immunosuppression to evaluate ex vivo candidate treatments which could rejuvenate immune functions after septic shock

Start: October 2019