300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

100 active trials for Respiratory Failure

How Does Patients' Overall Assessment of Their Health Vary Across and Within Different Disease Groups?

EQ-5D is one of the most commonly employed patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. It is included in many of the Swedish National Quality Registers (NQRs). EQ-5D health states are usually summarized using 'values' obtained from healthy members of the general public. However an alternative - which remains to be studied in detail - is the potential to use patients' self-reported overall health on the visual analogue scale as a means of capturing experience-based values. The overall aim of this project is to increase knowledge on the potential applicability of EQ VAS as a health state valuation method through assessment of its variability across and within patient groups and compared with that of the general population in Sweden. Data on nearly 700,000 patients from 12 NQRs covering a variety of diseases/conditions and from the general population will be analysed. Longitudinal studies of PROs among different patient groups will be conducted at baseline/first visit and 1-year follow-up. Descriptive analyses comparing EQ-5D health states and observed self-assessed EQ VAS within and across registers will be performed. Comparisons of the change in health state and observed EQ VAS values over one year will also be made. Regression models will be used to assess whether EQ-5D dimensions predict observed EQ VAS values to investigate patient value sets in each NQR. These will be compared across the patient groups and with the existing Swedish experience-based VAS and time trade-off (TTO) value sets obtained from the general population. This research project will provide information on the variation among different patient groups in terms of self-reported health status through EQ VAS and comparison with the general population. Knowledge on the relative importance of different dimensions of the EQ-5D to different patient groups as well as the general population will be gained in this project. The possibility of getting value sets based on patients' self-reported EQ VAS values and their comparison with value sets from experience-based general population studies will be discussed.

Start: January 2002
Critical Respiratory Diseases in Ex-preterm Infants in PICU

Premature birth is the leading cause of death in children younger than 5 years old worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Premature infants who survive are at greater risk of a range of short-term and long-term health consequences. Common long-term health morbidities among children who are born prematurely include cerebral palsy, infections (particularly respiratory infections), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, feeding difficulties, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, visual and hearing problems. Re-hospitalization occurs frequently during first few years of life among ex-premature infants with respiratory illness. This leads to increased financial burden for health care system and families. The impact of prematurity on the health care system, especially on pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) has mainly been evaluated in high income countries. Little is known about long term health outcomes of ex-premature infants and their impact on the cost to health care system in low- and middle-income countries. This pilot, single institution, observational study aims to determine the prevalence, course of the diseases, and outcomes of ex-premature infants with respiratory illnesses who are admitted to a PICU of a tertiary children's hospital in Vietnam. Investigators will determine the epidemiology of respiratory illness, and the resource utilization for these children in the PICU. To achieve these aims, the investigators will prospectively screen and recruit all children aged less than 2 years old admitted to the PICU with respiratory illness/failure and collect pertinent clinical data. The study participants will be follow-up until PICU discharge.

Start: November 2019
High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non-invasive Ventilation in Prevention of Escalation to Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Oxygen therapy is first-line treatment in the management of acute respiratory failure (ARF). Different oxygen devices have become available over recent decades, such as low-flow systems (nasal cannula, simple facemask, non-rebreathing reservoir mask) and high-flow systems (Venturi mask) . Since the 90's, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been largely used with strong level of evidence in cardiogenic pulmonary edema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation. NIV improves gas exchange and reduces inspiratory effort through positive pressure. However, good tolerance to NIV is sometimes difficult to achieve due to frequent leaks around the mask, possibly leading to patient-ventilator asynchrony and even to intubation . High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) is an innovative high-flow system that allows for delivering up to 60 liters\ min of heated and fully humidified gas with a FIO2 ranging between 21% and 100% . It is a new method of respiratory support in adults that has been used in neonatal ARF for some years. The reason this study is necessary is because, even though NIV has been demonstrated to prevent endotracheal intubation (and its associated complications) in a broad range of ARF patients, HFNC has been proposed to have the same effect as NIV while being easier tolerated, more physiological , allowing patients to continue to talk, eat and drink through mouth while on HFNC

Start: May 2019
RIB PAIN (Rib Fractures Treated With Parental Analgesia With Infused LidocaiNe)

Traumatic rib fractures (RF) are a relatively common occurrence in patients of all ages, with a 10% incidence in all trauma patients and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Adequate analgesia is paramount for preventing pulmonary complications and can reduce morbidity and mortality. There is longstanding evidence of lidocaine's effectiveness and safety in the post-operative patient and the investigators hypothesize that this modality may prove to be ideal in trauma patients with RF. Therefore, it is imperative that intravenous lidocaine be investigated to ascertain if there is significant benefit for pain reduction in patients who have sustained rib fractures. A single-centre, double-blind, randomized control trial to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a 72-96 hour IV lidocaine infusion plus standard analgesics versus placebo infusion plus standard analgesics will be performed on patients (age 18 or older) diagnosed with two or more traumatic rib fractures ,from blunt thoracic trauma, requiring hospital admission at Victoria Hospital. The primary outcome is mean pain score, as measured on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) when the patient is at rest and with movement. Secondary outcomes are protocol adherence, patient satisfaction as measured on the VAS, incidence of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, mortality, incidence of lidocaine toxicity, treatment regimens (use of additional non-opioid analgesics) and total morphine equivalents used (including breakthrough doses). This trial will serve to quantify the analgesic efficacy of intravenous lidocaine for patients with traumatic rib fractures. Successful completion of a single centre trial will inform the development of a multi-centre trial powered to demonstrate a reduction in respiratory failure in the trauma population.

Start: June 2019
Targeted OXYgen Therapy in Critical Illness

The investigators propose to conduct a feasibility, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of targeted oxygen therapy in adult critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube as part of their treatment for respiratory failure. Participants will be allocated to either a normal blood oxygen target group or a lower than normal blood oxygen target group. The primary purpose of the study will be to assess the feasibility of recruiting complex patients who lack capacity into a clinical trial in which oxygenation is being assessed, and that the clinicians responsible for these patients are able to deliver the intervention effectively. The safety of using a lower than normal blood oxygen target will also be assessed and blood samples taken for subsequent investigation of the biological mechanisms underlying the observed changes. Participants will be randomised (1:1) into either an intervention or control group. The intervention in this trial is tightly controlled administration of oxygen to patients to achieve a haemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 88-92%. The control group will also have tightly controlled oxygen administration, but to achieve an SpO2 of 96% or above. The target for the control group represents a normal SpO2, whilst that in the intervention group is lower than what is considered to be normal. It should be noted that although lower than normal, this SpO2 is close to what the general public experience when travelling by pressurised aircraft as the fractional inspired oxygen concentration in that situation is only 0.15-0.17 (15-17%). The controlled oxygen administration would commence as soon as possible after admission to the critical care unit and end following removal of the participant's artificial breathing tube. The researchers and clinical team cannot be blinded to treatment allocation, due to the nature of the intervention. Those analysing the data will be blinded to the intervention.

Start: January 2018