300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

109 active trials for Postoperative Complications

Evaluation of the ACS-NSQIP Risk Calculator for Emergent Surgery in a Spanish Population

Nowadays, quality of life and individualised medicine are becoming more important in the everyday medical practice and surgery it is not an exception. In recent years, the interest in the improvement of the quality of surgical procedures and outcomes has increased. This quality can be improved by assessing the surgical or operative risk by evaluating the postoperative mortality and morbidity. Most of the risk stratification tools are used in elective surgery. Only few have been specifically validated for immediate or urgent. However, there are different situations. In elective interventions, the patient and the surgeon can discuss the advantages and drawbacks and postpone the decision. Moreover, an improvement in the physical status of the patient can be performed whereas in immediate or urgent surgery there is no time to neither of them. POSSUM is used as the main tool for the prediction of mortality and morbidity and for assessing the quality care of the General Surgery Unit of Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí. Nevertheless, this system has its limitations. It overestimates mortality in low risk patients and it does not take into account the specific surgical procedure. That is why, it is believed that the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator -created in 2013- is a potential good tool to stratify surgical risks. In contrast with POSSUM, it considers any surgical procedure -according to the Current Procedural Terminology. The calculator has been externally validated in population of North-America which requires emergent surgery with a somewhat underestimation of the risk. As populations have different profiles and there are different levels of care, it is needed the external validation in other countries. In essence, there is a need of validation of risk calculators in different populations and emergency surgery (immediate and urgent) is distinct from the elective operation, therefore they should be considered separately when risk is calculated. Therefore, there is a need of validation of the ACS NSQIP risk calculator in Spanish population which requires emergency (immediate and urgent) surgery. On the other hand, it is suggested that ACS NSQIP risk calculator performs better than POSSUM . Hence, its prediction performance is compared with POSSUM.

Start: June 2019
Optimization of a Fast-track Concept for Knee Joint Replacement

In an estimated 150,000 patients, a knee joint replacement is performed in Germany every year. The perioperative care of the patients aims at an optimal surgical technique, which leads to a high functionality in the joint, and above all at an adequate pain treatment. Patients experience pain especially intraoperatively and in the first days after the operation. The intensity of pain is a decisive factor that can hinder the patient's mobilization. In the KneeOptOut study (ethics application number EA4/009/17), which has already been successfully carried out and approved by this ethics committee, it was shown that the use of local infiltration anaesthesia (LIA) for pain therapy after primary knee endoprosthetics is comparable to catheter-supported regional anaesthesia (manuscript under review at the European Journal of Anaesthesiology). During surgery, the morphine requirement of patients in the LIA group was significantly higher than that of patients who underwent catheterization. Postoperatively, however, both subjective pain by VAS and opiate consumption were comparable. In order to optimize the intraoperative opiate need/consumption, an early-intraoperative procedure for local infiltration anesthesia will now be compared with the previous late-intraoperative procedure. Both procedures correspond to SOP for the treatment of primary knee endoprostheses and are currently used depending on the surgeon's requirements.

Start: March 2019