300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

70 active trials for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

QFR-based Virtual PCI Versus Angio-guided PCI

A significant portion of patients continue to experience both adverse events and symptoms after angiographically successful PCI. Beyond different underlying mechanisms non-related to epicardial disease (vasospasm, microcirculatory dysfunction), several recent studies have shown that in at least 15-20% of PCIs, a prognostically meaningful ischemia, detected with different coronary physiology tools, is present at the end of a successful angiography-guided PCI. In addition, physiology is able to discriminate the underlying reason causing the suboptimal functional result, namely: i) in-stent drop; ii) focal drop outside stent; iii) diffuse disease. However, the use of post-PCI physiology is still very low, even when it is utilized pre-PCI to set the indication for stenting. Lack of dedicated randomized clinical trials and procedural lengthening and increase in side effects are at the basis of this underutilization. In addition, the ideal tool should allow to plan the intervention in advance rather than to assess the results afterwards. To this hand, QFR is particularly appealing, among available physiology tools, because it does not need wire or adenosine and allows: i) identification of disease mechanism; ii) co-registration with angiography; iii) pre-PCI planning with residual vessel QFR value according to a pre-specified treatment. Taken all this characteristics together, QFR is the ideal technology for virtual PCI. The hypothesis of the present investigation is that a procedural planning based on QFR (virtual PCI) is able to reduce the rate of patients with post-PCI suboptimal functional result, that has been found to correlate with prognosis in our earlier study, if compared to the traditional angio-guided PCI.

Start: February 2021
Management of Antiplatelet Regimen During Surgical Procedures

There are key differences today in clinical practice regarding perioperative management of post-PCI patients on DAPT undergoing NCS. Moreover, there are significant differences between bridging agents, and improved safety of current-generation DES. Given the significant limitations of current studies a well-designed registry to study current U.S. practice patterns and the bleeding or ischemic risks associated with the various perioperative DAPT management strategies including bridging and no bridging will significantly add to the understanding of the current problem and associated risks of patients. These data could form the basis for conducting future randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in this area. NCS in post-PCI patients on chronic DAPT presents a complex interaction of both ischemic and bleeding risks. The MARS registry will study the area of perioperative antiplatelet therapy management through a multicenter observational national registry designed to collect pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative clinical strategies, therapeutic interventions and outcomes data. This proposal outlines the role of a highly experienced clinical trial team to conduct a multicenter prospective registry. This question is highly relevant to a diverse group of medical providers and millions of patients in the US and around the world; this will be the first such U.S. registry to address this critically important public health issue. Study objectives: i. To collect data on contemporary clinical practice in the U.S. on managing post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) DAPT in patients scheduled to undergo NCS and CS. ii. To assess ischemic and bleeding endpoints in this group of patients during the study period. iii. To generate initial data to plan for future large-scale randomized clinical trials on perioperative management of DAPT.

Start: August 2019
Dapagliflozin to Prevent the Incidence of Contrast Induced Nephropathy After Heart Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Left heart catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become a useful tool in interventional cardiology, in which iodinated contrast media is used. Although the use of iodinated contrast media (CM) is considered to be safe in patients with normal renal function, it is risky in patients with known chronic renal insufficiency (CKD) and diabetes mellitus. Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) remains one of the most leading causes of in hospital acute kidney injury (AKI), affecting morbidity and mortality. There are various mechanisms through which CM develop their nephrotoxic effects, including renal vasoconstriction and medullary hypoxia, tubular cell toxicity and reactive oxygen species formation. Inhibitors of type 2 sodium- glucose co-transporter (SGLT2i) is a relatively recent addition to the array of anti-diabetic agents, becoming part of everyday clinical practice. However, although SGLT2i were first used solely as antidiabetics because of their glycosuric effect, further research demonstrated that these drugs may independently reduce cardiovascular events, especially in patients with heart failure, a benefit that was consistent among diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Moreover, pleiotropic effects have been observed, including a reno-protective action. In addition to the effects mediated by intrarenal hemodynamic changes, SGLT2-i also have direct anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic nephroprotective effects. Indeed, SGLT2-i suppress the production of reactive oxygen species, lessening glomerulosclerosis and tubulo-interstitial fibrosis. These findings suggest that the use of SGLT2i could offer benefit by reducing/ preventing the nephrotoxic effects of contrast media leading to the assumption that the use of these drugs could prevent the incidence nephropathy after cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Start: April 2021
Short and Long-term Results of PCI in no Touch Vein-graft.

Coronary artery disease is one of the biggest health issue worldwide.The treatment, in a large part of the patients, implicates a so called bypass-operation, that consists in to connect new vascular conduits (grafts) beyond the narrowed coronary vessels to improve the blood supply to the heart. One of the graft that is commonly used is the saphenous vein from the leg. The disadvantage of the saphenous vein graft is the predisposition to early obstruction. The international literature shows the following grades of occlusion: 15% in the first year and 40% after 10 year. At the Cardio-Thoracic Clinic of the University hospital of Örebro has been developed a new method to harvest the saphenous vein together with the surrounding fat-tissue. This technique, called no-touch technique, has the advantage to reduce the damages to the vein during the harvesting, showing a substantially reduced risk for future occlusion (5% after 18 months and 10% after 8,5 years). The aim of the PhD project is to evaluate the results of the no-touch technique in compare to the conventional technique for the venous graft harvesting. The focus of the study is to analyse all the operated patients in our clinic who underwent a post-operative coronary angiography do to angina pectoris (heart pain). All the patients who received a stent during the post-operative angiography will be analysed in detail and one will compare the occlusion grade and the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). This study is the first and the only one in the world that will examine the long-term results of the no-touch technique in particular after the stenting of the venous graft.

Start: October 2017