300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

426 active trials for Pain

Neural and Psychological Mechanisms of Pain Perception

Background: - Painful stimuli cause changes in a network of brain regions called the Pain Matrix. But most of these regions respond to many other stimuli, not just pain. Researchers want to understand how different factors influence pain. They want to test what happens when people expect different levels of pain and receive treatments that can modify pain. They want to see if these factors influence decisions about pain and how the body responds to it. They also want to compare pain with responses like taste and vision. Objectives: - To better understand how pain and emotions are processed and influenced by psychological factors. Eligibility: - Healthy volunteers ages 18 50. Design: This study requires 1 to 2 clinic visits that last 1 to 3 hours. Participants will be screened with medical history and physical exam. Some participants will have one or more magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of their brain. For MRI, participants will lie on a table that slides in and out of a cylinder. The scanner makes loud knocking noises. They will get earplugs. Participants heart activity will be recorded with electrocardiogram. Their pulse, sweating, and breathing will be monitored. Some participants will take a taste test. Others may perform simple tasks. Others may receive pain in their arm, leg, or hand. The pain will come from heat or electric shocks. Others may judge pain using a topical pain-relieving cream. Some of these tests may be given during MRI. Participants will fill out questionnaires. The study will last 3 years.

Start: June 2015
Sociocultural & Biobehavioral Influences on Pain Expression and Assessment

Background: People can feel different levels of pain. This may depend on social, cultural, and biological factors. These factors can also influence how people respond to each other, and how they judge other people s experiences. Researchers want to learn more about these relationships. Objective: To study if social and cultural factors lead to differences in pain experience and how pain is interpreted by other individuals. Eligibility: Healthy adults ages 18-60 Design: Participants will have 1 or 2 visits. Participants will be screened with a medical history and nursing assessment. Participants may have the following: Electric shock through small sticky pads on the arm, leg, or foot. Thermal stimulation. A device called a thermode will be placed on the arm, leg, or foot. A computer controls the thermode temperature. Lowering their hand into very cold water. Videos or pictures of the face will recorded while participants get painful stimulation. A test to record heart electrical activity. Small metal disc or sticky pad electrodes will be placed on the chest. Pulse rate and breathing measured. Sweating will be measured with two small sensors stuck on the hand. A test to measure the electrical activity of facial muscles. Small metal disk or sticky pad electrodes will be attached to the skin. Viewing pictures and/or videos of other people who get painful and nonpainful stimulation. Participants will make decisions about the images. They will respond by keyboard, mouse, or button. Eye tracking. A camera will measure participants pupil size and follow their eye movements. ...

Start: May 2018
Effectiveness of a Modern Educational Intervention in Breast Cancer Patients

In addition to fatigue, pain is the most frequent and persistent symptom following breast cancer and breast cancer treatment. Despite the effectiveness of different physical therapy modalities, such as manual techniques, passive mobilizations and exercises, many patients still experience pain and subsequent difficulties in daily functioning at short and long term. Past decades, the awareness on the important role of educational interventions in the management of pain in general has increased. Educational interventions aim at explaining and improving the knowledge, control and attitude of the patient regarding his/her pain complaint. However, these educational interventions are often restricted to more biomedical pain management instructions and general advice on physical activity and analgesics (= traditional biomedical education). Only recently, increased knowledge on pain mechanisms led to a more modern educational approach. This modern approach is suited to explain more complex issues associated with pain and takes into account many more factors related to pain. To our knowledge, only one controlled trial investigated the effectiveness of a modern educational intervention in the early stage of breast cancer treatment. The results were very promising for shoulder function. However, only short-term effects were examined, no randomization was performed and no pain-related and socio-economic outcomes were evaluated. Therefore, the aim of the proposed project is to investigate the effectiveness of a similar modern educational program, in addition to standard physical therapy care, in the early treatment phase of breast cancer in comparison with traditional biomedical education. A randomized controlled trial will be performed with a long-term follow up period. The primary outcome parameter is pain-related disability. Secondary outcomes are different dimensions of pain, physical and mental functioning, return to work and health-care related costs.

Start: November 2017
Enhancing Analgesia in Chronic Pain Through Exercise

Background: Current pain management strategies for pediatric patients are not integrating the analgesic potential of movement-based therapies. To date, experiencing a painful stimulus has been known to disrupt motor activity in an attempt to minimize injury. However, physical activity, even when it increases ongoing pain initially, has been shown to significantly reduce pain symptoms eventually through neuromodulation. In both acute and chronic pain cohorts, exercise protocols and neuromodulation paradigms have produced exercise-related analgesia. Problem: It is not currently understood which brain regions are implicated in exercise-based analgesia and what brain regions moderate this response. Approach: The investigators intend to provide a physical activity intervention designed to promote exercise-induced analgesia. This intervention will be performed in a group of pediatric subjects with Chronic Widespread Pain Disorder. An exercise (n=10), no exercise (n=10) and healthy control (n=10) group will be recruited. Aims: This study has three aims: (1) To understand how thermal pain sensitivity, pain symptoms and motor performance are impacted in patients with chronic pain after an exercise-based intervention. (2) To evaluate the brain regions involved in a simple motor task as well as how motor activity influences activity in pain regions of the brain. (3) To evaluate the network structure of the brain, with special emphasis on motor and pain regions, in youth with a pain disorder who have undergone an exercise-based intervention. Exercise-based therapy in pediatric subjects with a chronic pain condition is predicted to reduce pain symptom reporting through biasing activity in pain regions during motor performance. Significance: Findings from this investigation will address the clinical side of pain management strategies and provide potential therapeutic targets and feasibility data. The investigators anticipate that findings will show how pain and motor regions of the brain interact at the network level and if this interaction can be modulated through exercise. Findings will also evaluate the brain regions that mediate the analgesic properties of an exercise-based pain therapy and provide future therapeutic targets.

Start: June 2021
Determinants of Implementation Success Coordinating Ventilator, Early Ambulation and Rehabilitation Efforts

There is a fundamental gap between the discovery of proven-effective intensive care unit (ICU) sedation, mechanical ventilation, mobility, and symptom management strategies and approaches that can equip ICU providers with the skills necessary to reliably adopt these interventions in everyday practice. Until this gap is filled, the millions of patients with heart, lung, and blood disorders admitted to ICUs annually will remain at risk for avoidable physical, mental, and cognitive health impairments that may persist for months to years after hospital discharge. In the proposed study, the investigative team will continue their partnership with the Society of Critical Care Medicine's (SCCM's) ICU Liberation Collaborative. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, the overall objective of the Determinants of Implementation Success Coordinating Ventilator, Early Ambulation and Rehabilitation Efforts in the ICU (DISCOVER-ICU) study is to develop multilevel implementation strategies to enhance sustainable adoption of the ABCDEF (Assess, prevent, and manage pain and delirium, both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials, choice of sedation, early mobility, family engagement) bundle in routine ICU practice. Using a multiphase, sequential, mixed-methods design, this study has three specific aims: 1) estimate the effects of patient-level characteristics on ABCDEF bundle adoption; 2) examine unit-level variation in ABCDEF bundle adoption and associated provider- and organization-level characteristics; and 3) determine which implementation strategies result in the greatest adoption of the ABCDEF bundle. Existing deidentified data will be obtained from >15,000 patients, >5,000 interprofessional ICU team members, and 68 hospitals participating in the ICU Liberation Collaborative to achieve specific aims 1 and 2. For specific aim 3, data collection will be extended using interprofessional ICU team surveys, a modified Delphi process, and concept mapping to achieve greater understanding of implementation strategies that prove most effective for ABCDEF bundle adoption. Results of this work will directly lead to the development of implementation strategies that are adaptable, responsive to community needs, and account for the cultural and organizational factors necessary to increase ABCDEF bundle adoption. These implementation strategies will then be tested in a future cluster randomized hybrid II implementation effectiveness trial.

Start: January 2020
Reduction of Thermal Pain From a Personalized Musical Intervention : Effect of Musical Preference

This is a randomized, 3-days study with the objective to compare the modulation of pain from our musical intervention to the CPT-induced analgesia and silence. The mean pain felt before and after CPT, the silence, and at three times points for the music conditions, 2.20 minutes, 11.30 minutes and 20 minutes, will be evaluated. Based on previous data, the sample size has been estimated, and 30 participants will be enrolled. They will undergo four conditions: CPT, silence, Most-Liked Music (MLM) and Least-Liked Music. The music used will be Music Care, a personalized musical intervention used in clinical settings. It has a U shape in six sections that each have different tempi, number of instruments and volume. There will be two music conditions: the most-liked-music (MLM) and least-liked-music (LLM) conditions. The sequence rated the highest will be listened to during the MLM and the one rated the lowest will be listened during the LLM condition. MLM will be considered as a score between 7 and 10 on the preference scale. LLM will be considered as a score between 0 and 4. The cold pressor test will consist in the immersion of the participants' arm in 10 degrees circulating water for two minutes. The silence condition will consist of six minutes in which the participants stay seated on the examination chair without access to their phones or other provided distractions. There will be three testing days for each participants. They will be seated in a comfortable chair in a quiet room. The first day, before the pain tests started, consent form will be read and signed by the participants. After, the MLM and LLM will be determined. Then, the sociodemographic questionnaire, the two State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) subscales, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) will be administered. Finally, a first two minutes pain test will be performed (T1), the CPT and a second pain test (T2). The second and third day will consist of first the STAI, the state subscale, the silence condition and then one music condition. The order of music condition will be randomized. The silence condition will consist of a first pain test (T3 or T8), six minutes of silence and then a second pain test (T4 or T9). Those 6 minutes will be chosen in order to equal the duration between the end of the first pain test and the start of the second one of the music intervention condition. In fact, for the music condition, whether it's the MLM or LLM, the first pain tests will be performed at 2.20 minutes after the music started (T5 or T10). The second will be after the relaxation phase at 11.30 minutes (T6 or T11) and the third after the whole 20-minutes cycle (T6 or T12). A post music condition score of the MLM and LLM on the same preference scale as the selection will be administered. Quantitative data will be described using mean, standard deviation, median, extreme values (minimum and maximum) and the number of missing data. Qualitative data will be described by their distributions in terms of numbers and percentages by class as well as the number of missing data. The normality condition will be verified using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Quantitative variables will be compared by the paired Student test if conditions were checked or by the non-parametric test of the signed Wilcoxon ranks, as part of the comparison of 2 modalities. The quantitative variables will be compared between the 3 conditions using a repeated-measure ANOVA or Friedman test. Tests will be bilateral, with a threshold of 5%.

Start: April 2021
Evaluation of ESMO Guidelines Applicability and Adherence in Cancer Pain Management in the Palliative Care Setting

Palliative care (PC) is focused on improving the Quality of Life (QoL) of patients living with a life-threatening illness. Each year, an estimated 40 million people need PC management in the world. In the European Union, it is estimated that about 4,5 million of people are in the need of PC every year, with about 40% affected by malignant neoplasia. Data from a recent systematic review of the literature report that the prevalence of pain is 66% (95% confidence interval 58-75) in cancer patients with advanced stages of the disease. In 52% of cases, pain was moderate or severe in intensity (NRS, Numeric Rating Scale ?4). Furthermore, in addition to the basic pain, having characteristics of continuity over time even in the presence of fluctuations in intensity, the presence of acute painful episodes must also be considered, which are defined with the term of Breakthrough Cancer Pain, (BTcP), whose prevalence is estimated between 21 and 59%. The positive impact on the quality of life of cancer patients of adhering to current guidelines has been amply demonstrated. Recently, new guidelines or recommendations produced by scientific societies have published, including the European Association of Palliative Care, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). In clinical facilities directly involved in the treatment of pain in cancer patients, implementing the directives set out in the guidelines appears to be a correct objective for the appropriateness of treatments. Nevertheless, there are no studies in Europe that have evaluated the applicability and adherence to guidelines in the treatment of cancer pain in advanced cancer patients. The present study intends to collect detailed information on the characteristics of pain and the treatment in a population of cancer patients cared by a network of specialized palliative care centers in order to assess the applicability and adherence of the latest European guidelines published by ESMO in 2018 for the treatment of pain in the specific area.

Start: January 2021