300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

197 active trials for Osteoarthritis (Knee)

All Polyethylene Versus Metal Backed Tibial Components in Knee Replacement

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures. Approximately 84,000 knee replacement procedures were recorded in the UK in 2012. The main goal of TKA is to relieve the disabling pain of arthritic disease. Patient satisfaction following TKA is related to quick recovery and return to daily activities. This can be dependent on the design of the implant used in the knee. Improvements in implant design and surgical technique mean many modern designs offer implant survival rates beyond 10 - 15 years. As cost pressure increases in the NHS the unit cost of implants is now being scrutinised, particularly with regard to cost effectiveness. The Press-Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma implant can be used with either a conventional metal backed or alternatively an all polyethylene tibial component (part fitted to the shin bone), the latter considerably cheaper to manufacture. Four small prospective randomised trials and one large regional registry study with long follow up support the safe use of all polyethylene tibial components in TKA. The investigators will therefore undertake a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing the results of all polyethylene tibial components with those of conventional metal backed tibial components in patients aged 75 or over, comparing both clinical outcome and radiological survivorship. The type of knee replacement used for each patient (metal-backed or polyethylene) will be chosen at random once a patient has agreed to take part in the study. Data will be collected by means of follow-up appointments and questionnaires and clinical tests both before the operation 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively. This will allow us to see how both types of knee replacement perform over time and if one performs better than the other in terms of patients movement, pain and functional activities.

Start: January 2017
Comparing Different Types of Physical Therapy for Treating People With a Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis is a disabling problem affecting over 15 million adults in the United States. Many people who have knee arthritis also experience painful meniscal tears. There are a number of different treatments that can be used to manage meniscal tears in the presence of knee arthritis. Treatments include surgically removing the damaged part of the meniscus; strengthening exercises to improve pain and function; manual therapy including massage and mobilization; acupuncture; and others. The combination of surgery and exercise therapy was long thought to be the best treatment. However, recent studies have shown that surgery followed by physical therapy is no more effective than physical therapy by itself. While physical therapy alone has been shown to result in similar pain relief as arthroscopic surgery, researchers have not yet done studies to determine what type of physical therapy is best for people with knee arthritis and meniscal tears. In the "TeMPO" Trial, we will be comparing 4 different, non-operative physical therapy regimens in order to gain a better understanding of how physical therapy works and what regimen will best reduce pain and improve function in persons with meniscal tear and osteoarthritis. The four arms in this randomized trial will contain different combinations of therapeutic treatments including in-clinic therapist-supervised exercise, in-clinic topical therapies, and exercises to be completed at home. Subjects in three of the arms will also receive motivational SMS (text) messages intended to improve adherence to the home exercise regimen. TeMPO is designed as a randomized controlled trial. Participants will be assigned randomly to one of the four arms. All arms include therapies that have been previously shown to work in clinical settings. One arm also contains some placebo treatments. The placebo treatments will help us to understand what aspects of physical therapy actually make people feel better. Our hypothesis is that subjects in the arm that includes in-clinic physical therapy and a home exercise regimen will experience more pain relief than subjects in each of the other arms. Also, we expect that subjects in the arm that receives the home exercise regimen and SMS messages will experience more pain relief than subjects in the arm that receives home exercise without the SMS messages.

Start: February 2018
A Study to Determine the Safety and the Efficacy of Fasinumab Compared to Placebo and Naproxen for Treatment of Adults With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab compared with placebo, when administered for up to 16 weeks in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip. The secondary objectives of the study are: To evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab compared with naproxen, when administered for up to 16 weeks in patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip To evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab compared with placebo, when administered for up to 44 weeks in patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip To assess the safety and tolerability of fasinumab compared with naproxen, when administered for up to 16 weeks in patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip To assess the safety and tolerability of fasinumab compared with naproxen, when administered for up to 52 weeks in patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip To assess the safety and tolerability of fasinumab compared with naproxen, when administered for up to 104 weeks in patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of fasinumab administered to patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip for up to 52 weeks To evaluate the PK profile of fasimumab administered to patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip for up to 104 weeks To evaluate the immunogenicity of fasinumab administered to patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip for up to 52 weeks To evaluate the immunogenicity of fasinumab administered to patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip for up to 104 weeks To evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab compared with naproxen, when administered for up to 44 weeks in patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip

Start: August 2017