300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

54 active trials for Nicotine Dependence

Impact of Alternative Nicotine-Delivery Products on Combustible Cigarette Use

The goal of this research is to understand the potential impact of two new FDA strategies to ensure the availability of safer Alternative Nicotine Delivery Systems (ANDS) and to reduce the nicotine content in combustible cigarettes to non-addictive levels. Specifically, this research will examine how well ANDS and very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNCs) can work alone or in combination with the current strategy of providing a safe source of nicotine via nicotine replacement medications to reduce use of combustible cigarettes, in real-world settings. The investigators will enroll 180 daily adult smokers who are not planning to quit smoking within the next 30 days into this mixed design study. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three levels of the between-subjects factor: 1) VLNC cigarettes; 2) Juul e-cigarettes (with nicotine); or 3) no alternative product. Participants receiving an alternative product (VLNC or e-cigarettes) will be asked to use it for 4 weeks (Weeks 1 through 4). During Weeks 2 and 4 all participants will be asked to switch from their cigarettes to use only study products (i.e., Juul e-cigarettes, VLNCs, or no alternative product) and to use either an active nicotine or placebo patch (the within-subjects factor), provided in double-blind fashion and counterbalanced order. During Weeks 1 through 4, participants will use a smartphone to record, in the moment, each time they use their own cigarettes or any alternative product. For a random daily subset of use events, participants will complete additional questions about the internal and external context of their use (e.g., affect, any restrictions on smoking) and their response to use (e.g., withdrawal alleviation, taste, satisfaction). Using these data, the investigators will also examine the effects of these products on the rewarding value of smoking and possible mechanisms driving such behavior (e.g., withdrawal alleviation, satisfaction, taste). This research will provide critical information regarding the potential impact of providing cigarettes with non-addictive levels of nicotine and safe ANDS, with or without nicotine replacement, in real-world settings on smokers' use of their usual cigarettes and other outcomes. Information on the short-term effects of products that could be accessible in the future will provide data that could inform regulatory policy decisions regarding the public health impact of safe ANDS and non-addictive cigarettes.

Start: September 2020
Understanding How Cigarette Direct Mail Marketing Influences Smoking Behaviors Among High and Low Socioeconomic Status Young Adult Smokers

Background: Smoking is a major public health problem in the U.S. Almost a half a million Americans die from it in a year. One thing that contributes to why people smoke is the marketing of cigarettes. Cigarette direct mail marketing usually targets young smokers of lower socioeconomic status. Researchers want to find out more about how this kind of marketing influences smoking behavior in young people from different socioeconomic levels. Objectives: To study the effects of cigarette direct mail marketing on beliefs, responses, and arousal. To study how these things may differ among young adult smokers of high and low socioeconomic status. Eligibility: Healthy adults ages 18 to 29 who smoke. Design: Participants will have 1 visit. Participants will be asked questions about their health and recent smoking. A nurse will check their vital signs. Participants will have a simple eye exam. They will give blood and urine samples. Participants will be connected to equipment. This will collect data while they look at pictures. Then they will have a 10-minute break. A nurse will observe them during the break. Participants will have their breath analyzed. Participants will answer questions. The topics will include: Education Job Income Family history Tobacco use Exposure to pro-smoking and anti-smoking messages History of drug and alcohol use

Start: November 2021
TMS-fMRI for Neural Pathway in Smokers

Cigarette smoking causes significant morbidity and mortality in the United States. Smoking cessation is difficult, with the average smoker attempting to quit five times before permanent success. Moreover, the majority of smoking quit attempts result in relapse. Brain stimulation for smoke cessation is an exciting new area that builds on advancing neuroscience knowledge concerning the functional neurocircuitry of addiction. Cortical stimulation can now be performed non-invasively by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Several studies have shown that TMS can reduce cue-elicited craving in smokers. Previous research by group has shown that a single session of 15 minutes high frequency (10 Hz) repetitive TMS (rTMS) at 100% motor threshold over the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can reduce cue-induced craving compared to sham TMS. However, the mechanism by which craving is reduced by rTMS is poorly understood both at behavioral and neural levels. Neuroimaging studies in nicotine dependence have revealed cue-related responses in numerous brain areas, including frontal, parietal cortices and subcortical areas. Recently functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies by the group have shown that cue-induced craving induced brain activation in ventral medial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC), including medial frontal, orbital frontal and anterior cingulate. This Chair Research Development Fund (CRDF) pilot proposal will integrate two new techniques- TMS and fMRI to investigate DLPFC-VMPFC pathway in smokers. Using double-masked methods investigators hypothesize that cue-induced exposure will induce brain activity in VMPFC, and 15 minutes rTMS over DLPFC will reduce cue-induced craving through modulating DLPFC-VMPFC pathway (increased activity DLPFC and decreased activity VMPFC).

Start: January 2015
Cessation Screening Project

This project will use the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) to guide the development of optimized treatment strategies for the two most effective smoking cessation medications (Combination Nicotine Replacement [C-NRT] and varenicline). The investigators will recruit daily smokers from primary care to participate in a fully crossed, 2x2x2x2 factorial experiment (N=608) that evaluates 4 different factors: 1) Medication Type (Varenicline vs. C-NRT), 2) Preparation Medication (4 Weeks vs. Standard), 3) Medication Duration (Extended [24 weeks] vs. Standard [12 weeks]); and 4) Counseling (Intensive vs. Minimal). Participants will complete assessments one week pre-quit and then assessments of smoking status, treatment use, side effects, potential treatment mechanisms (e.g., withdrawal, self-efficacy) during the first week post-target quit date (TQD) and at Weeks 2, 4, 12, 20, 26, and 52 post-target quit date. These data will be used to examine the main and interactive effects of these four factors on various outcomes, with biochemically confirmed 12-month abstinence serving as the primary outcome. These data will also be used to determine which factors and combinations of factors are most effective with regard to 12-month biochemically confirmed abstinence and cost, thereby identifying optimized varenicline and C-NRT treatments, with each developed to yield especially great benefit. These optimized treatments will then be tested in the Optimized Care Project. The investigators will also examine the relative effects of each medication on particular outcomes (e.g., 12-month abstinence).

Start: December 2020
Effectiveness of an Integrated Treatment to Address Smoking Cessation and Anxiety/ Depression in People Living With HIV

Smokers living with HIV represent a major health disparity population in the United States and the world more generally. Major contributing factors to the maintenance and relapse of smoking among smokers living with HIV include increased exposure to multiple stressors associated with HIV, which often exacerbates anxiety/depression. In a previous project, the feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of a 9-session, cognitive-behavioral-based intervention to address smoking cessation by reducing anxiety and depression via specific emotional vulnerabilities (anxiety sensitivity, distress tolerance, and anhedonia) was tested against an enhanced standard of care in a pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT01393301). It was found that when compared to a brief enhanced treatment as usual control, patients in the intervention achieved higher short-term and long-term smoking abstinence rates. In this project, the investigators seek to test this same intervention in a fully powered, 3-arm efficacy/effectiveness trial. The goal of this study is to randomize 180 smokers across three sites to test the efficacy/effectiveness of the intervention at increasing point prevalence abstinence by reducing anxiety and depression at a 1-month follow-up (the end of treatment timepoint/ approximately 1-month post quit day) and a 6-month follow-up (approximately 6-months post quit day).

Start: December 2019
Nicotine Replacement Therapy in Nicotine-dependent Arrestees

Tobacco use affects more than 50% of adult arrestees, of which 70% are dependent on nicotine. However, they have no access to tobacco during detention in police cells. Nicotine withdrawal symptoms, that include irritability, anxiety and lack of concentration, may worsen the arrestee's health status during detention. Nicotine withdrawal is a treatable condition. Validated treatments in other situations than police custody include nicotine replacement therapy. This study is based on the following hypotheses: Manifestations related to nicotine withdrawal could increase the discomfort due to detention in police cells, A nicotine replacement therapy initiated during detention could improve the course of detention in police cells and could be useful in a perspective of long-lasting smoking cessation. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy among nicotine-dependent arrestees on the course of detention as perceived by the arrestees. Our secondary objectives are to evaluate the efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy on desire to smoke during detention in police cells and to improve long-term smoking cessation among dependent smokers. Interventions consist in the single administration of an active treatment (nicotine patch) or of a control treatment (placebo patch). Evaluations will include the results of a medical examination during detention, a self evaluation by the arrestees of their desire to smoke, and medical consultations and evaluations of tobacco use 7-10 days, one month and six months later.

Start: January 2017
Approach Bias Retraining to Augment Smoking Cessation

Tobacco use is the most preventable cause of disease, disability, and death in the United States. Standard smoking cessation care (cognitive behavioral therapy and nicotine replacement therapy), is effective in approximately 20% of the cases, clearly indicating there is substantial room for improvement. Current work suggests that despite standard interventions, continued substance abuse may result from addictive behaviors governed partly through automatic processes that exert their influence outside conscious control. This is important from a treatment perspective, as we should develop treatments to target implicit processes. Among a number of promising targets for intervention, cognitive biases are important to address as they have been implicated as maintenance factors for addiction. Approach bias, defined as the automatically activated action tendency to approach smoking-related stimuli, is a relatively novel cognitive bias and has been related to failed smoking cessation. A recently developed task for approach bias assessment is the Approach Bias Retraining (ABR), a computerized joystick task increasingly used to measure automatic approach tendencies in addiction research. This clinical trial will evaluate a smoking cessation intervention that integrates standard care with approach bias retraining. Results will provide novel information regarding the potential benefits of engaging implicit cognitive biases as a means to augment traditional smoking cessation therapy. This study has the potential to help individuals attempting to quit smoking and, ultimately, provide unique information about the importance of targeting implicit processes to complement standard care.

Start: November 2017