300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

25 active trials for Nausea

Inhaled Isopropyl Alcohol Versus Placebo to Manage Nausea at Electronic Dance Music Festivals

BACKGROUND Studies have shown that isopropyl alcohol inhalation is effective for the relief of nausea in the emergency department. A 2016 randomized controlled trial found that nasally inhaled isopropyl alcohol achieved better nausea relief compared to placebo during a 10-minute period. In 2018, another randomized controlled trial showed that nasally inhaled isopropyl alcohol with or without oral ondansetron provided greater relief for nausea than oral ondansetron alone. QUESTION In electronic dance music festival attendees, who present with nausea to the medical team, how does inhaled isopropyl alcohol compare with inhaled sterile saline (placebo) for self-reported nausea 10-minutes post-intervention? METHODS Albertan electronic dance music festival attendees who present with nausea to the medical team, will be recruited until sample size reaches at least 70. Inclusion criteria will be festival attendees aged 18+ with a complaint of nausea. Exclusion criteria will include known allergy to isopropyl alcohol, inability to inhale through the nares, inability to report level of nausea, or already have taken an anti-nauseant. After obtaining consent, participants will be randomized into two study arms. Arm 1 will nasally inhale an isopropyl alcohol pad with 10 deep inhalations (intervention). Arm 2 will nasally inhale a sterile saline pad with 10 deep inhalations (placebo). The pad must be within 2cm from the nares to ensure delivery. According to a study in 2002, isopropyl alcohol pad inhalation, dosed at 3 inhalations every 5 minutes for 3 doses, was not significantly different than standard treatment for relief of nausea. 10 inhalations exceeds the 9-dose total reported in the paper, and a one-time bolus dose of 10 inhalations, for the population and festival context, is more feasible in terms of patient compliance and patient flow. After randomization, participants will rate their nausea on a numeric response scale (0 to 10, where 0 is no nausea and 10 is "worst nausea imaginable"). 10-minutes post-inhalation (isopropyl alcohol or placebo), participants will be asked to rate their nausea again. The primary outcome is self-reported nausea scores 10-minutes post-intervention. The secondary outcome is the presence or absence of any vomiting spells 10-minutes post-intervention, as well as the presence or absence of rescue-medication needed 10-minutes post-intervention.

Start: July 2021
Enhanced Recovery Strategies in Elective Breast Surgery

Postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting are frustrating sequelae of elective breast surgery. Poorly managed postoperative pain can lead to increased opioid use, increased postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), delayed return to work and usual activities, unplanned hospital admissions, surgical complications, and patient dissatisfaction. In light of the growing opioid epidemic in the United States, any intervention that potentially minimizes opioid use may have meaningful individual and societal impact. In patients undergoing breast reduction and breast augmentation surgery, multiple techniques for managing postoperative pain are used commonly. One such technique is the use of a paravertebral block (PVB), which is a method of injecting local anesthesia into the area surrounding the spinal nerves in order to decrease sensation and pain in the chests and breasts in the setting of breast surgery. PVB is generally used concomitantly with standard multimodal perioperative pain management including cool compress, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and opioids. All of these pain management strategies are used at the University of Wisconsin and are considered standard of care for breast surgery nationwide. The overall purpose of this study is to evaluate interventions that aim to optimize pain control, minimize the risk of PONV, and improve recovery after elective breast surgery. We will do this by (1) Comparing PVB with standard pain management strategies in patients undergoing planned breast reduction and breast augmentation, and (2) Comparing "enhanced recovery after surgery" (ERAS) strategies to standard of care for patients undergoing planned breast reduction and breast augmentation. This will be studied using pain assessments, validated surveys, medication logs, and review of medical records.

Start: September 2017
Cannabis For Cancer-Related Symptoms

Clinical evidence is urgently needed to be able to advise patients on which cannabis-based products to take, or to avoid, in managing cancer-related symptoms. This trial was therefore designed to determine which cannabis extract combination (High THC-Low CBD, Low THC-High CBD, or Equal amounts of THC and CBD) is most effective at treating cancer related symptoms for each patient relative to placebo. Investigators propose a randomized, double-blind, N-of-1 trial to test the effectiveness of each cannabis extract combination using cannabis oils in a minimum of 120 patients on 4 cancer-related symptoms: nausea, pain, anxiety and sleep disturbance. The three active treatments will be the following cannabis oil extract combinations: High THC/Low CBD, Low THC/High CBD, and Equal amounts of THC/CBD. THC = Tetrahydrocannabinol CBD = Cannabidiol The placebo treatment will be coconut/olive oil. The overpowering flavor of the olive oil in the active oils and the placebo will effectively blind subjects. Primary objective: To identify whether there is an active cannabis extract that is more effective than placebo in managing overall cancer-related symptoms for individual subjects who completed at least 1 treatment cycle for the entire patient population represented by those individual subjects, and for subsets of that subject population defined by relevant baseline patient characteristics. Secondary objective: To identify whether there is a cannabis extract that is more effective than placebo in managing each of the 4 index symptoms (pain, nausea, anxiety and sleep disturbance) for individual subjects who completed at least 1 treatment cycle, for the entire patient population represented by those individual subjects, and for subsets of that subject population defined by relevant baseline patient characteristics. Tertiary objectives: To investigate the safety (e.g., serious adverse events) of each of the three cannabis extracts. To identify subject preference of each of the 4 oils (if any).

Start: February 2021
The Effects of Inhaled Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy Induced Nausea (CINV) and Vomiting

This study is a three group, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial with two repeated measurements. The same measurements will be collected for each participant during two consecutive chemotherapy treatment cycles.Subjects will be provided with written instructions as an educational handout as well as essential oil safety information. Subjects will be able to demonstrate an ability and accurate understanding of the proper use of the diffusers, using a demonstration diffuser, at the time of consent. At the time the subject will provide written informed consent, they will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups with a pocket diffuser containing either ginger essential oil, peppermint essential oil, or vanilla extract )placebo- control). This is based on a pre-determined list of random assignments. Each subject will be instructed to inhale from the pocket diffuser beginning on the day of their chemotherapy (Day 1) and continue using the inhaler for the next three consecutive days (Day 1-Day 4). The subjects will remove the cover of the pocket diffuser, place the pocket diffuser approximately an inch away from their nose and inhale three times with deep breathing (i.e., three sniffs). Subjects will take 3 sniffs of the aromatherapy inhaler three times daily (morning, afternoon, and evening). In addition to the Pre-treatment Assessment, occurring before each of the 2 cycles of chemotherapy, the subjects will be contacted to complete assessments at approximately 24 and 72 hours post-chemotherapy. A member of the study team will call the participant again at their preferred time of day to ask the survey questions. The same procedures will be repeated during the participant's second cycle of chemotherapy, which is likely two or three weeks after the first one.

Start: April 2021
Auriculotherapy and Acupuncture's Treatment for Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV)

The management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) has evolved in recent years and became less frequent. CINV include early (occurring within 24 hours of chemotherapy administration) and delayed (occurring within 4 days after chemotherapy) nausea and vomiting. Preventive treatment, such as Glucocorticoids, 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists and neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor antagonists, are administered according to the classification in 4 grades of expected CINV Very low: <10% occurrence of CINV; Low: 10 to 30% occurrence of CINV; Average: 30 to 90% occurrence of CINV; High: > 90% occurrence of CINV. These treatments have been the subject of recommendations. Despite these available treatments, some patients still complain of vomiting, or more frequently nausea and loss of appetite. Meanwhile, Chinese acupuncture has proven effective on the prevention of CINV as complementary treatment, mainly in the acute phase and to a lesser extent in the delayed phase. The most common points are Pericardium 6 (wrist) treated with conventional acupuncture needles, electro-acupuncture or acupressure. Auriculotherapy (ear acupuncture) has proven effective on nausea of pregnancy and postoperative nausea, but, to our knowledge, there are no studies published on the effect of auriculotherapy on CINV. These complementary treatments have virtually no side effects. In our institution, a simple treatment of acupuncture (2 points Pericardium 6 treated) and auriculotherapy (2 auricular point treated) is regularly use in patients who present CINV despite preventive treatment and most of them are relieved. The investigators propose a clinical trial in this population to assess symptoms improvement in patients presenting CINV after their first administration of chemotherapy despite adapted preventive treatment. Experimental treatment with semi-permanent needles takes place during administration of the second session of chemotherapy. CINV are evaluated through the (MAT) score that measures the frequency and intensity of nausea and vomiting in the 24 hours following the session and during the 4 days after administration Chemotherapy. Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Antiemesis Tool (MASCC), Http://www.MASCC.org/.

Start: May 2016