300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

260 active trials for Knee Osteoarthritis

Effect of Mechanical Traction and Therapeutic Exercises in Treatment of Primary Knee Osteoarthritis

The purpose of this study is to compare between therapeutic exercises and therapeutic exercises preceded by mechanical traction in treatment of patients with primary knee osteoarthritis attributed to the outcomes of pain, muscle strength, functional disability and functional performance. Hypotheses There will be no significant difference between therapeutic exercises and therapeutic exercises preceded by mechanical traction on reduction of knee pain severity in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis. There will be no significant difference between therapeutic exercises and therapeutic exercises preceded by mechanical traction on reduction of functional disability in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis. There will be no significant difference between therapeutic exercises and therapeutic exercises preceded by mechanical traction on increasing isometric quadriceps muscle strength in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis. There will be no significant difference between therapeutic exercises and therapeutic exercises preceded by mechanical traction on increasing isometric hamstring muscle strength in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis. There will be no significant difference between therapeutic exercises and therapeutic exercises preceded by mechanical traction on decreasing walking time in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis. There will be no significant difference between therapeutic exercises and therapeutic exercises preceded by mechanical traction on decreasing ascending and descending stairs time in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis.

Start: April 2021
A Comparison of Total Knee Replacement Patients Using the Zimmer-Biomet Persona Total Knee System With Different Inserts

As demand for knee joint arthroplasties surge, improving long term patients' satisfaction and implant survivorship has become of utmost importance, as patients seek not only to alleviate their condition, but also return to their usual daily activities and sports. Implant type and design plays an important role in this, with many modern designs seeking to replicate the native knee's kinematics and alignment through mimicry of native knee biomechanics in its femoral components, tibial components, and polyethylene bearing inserts. The Zimmer-Biomet Persona® Total Knee Cruciate-Retaining Femoral Component (CR Femur), used in conjunction with the kinematic alignment surgical technique, has been shown to produce better functional outcomes and improved patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty. More recently, Zimmer-Biomet introduced the Medial Congruent Bearing (MC Bearing) design to be used with the CR Femur; the design facilitates greater stability through increased anterior lip height compared to the original Cruciate Retaining Bearing (CR Bearing), thus allowing for greater anterior constraint and subluxation resistance that aids in activities requiring deeper flexion or full extension. However, the evidence that this will lead to better patient satisfaction and function is scarce, and requires further study to prove that the MC Bearing is a better insert choice to recommend to both surgeons and patients alike. 120 patients from Singapore General Hospital seeking primary total knee replacement surgery will be recruited for this study, and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the CR Bearing or the MC Bearing alongside the Zimmer-Biomet CR Femur implant. They will be followed up for two years post-operatively, and their outcomes recorded at specific milestones to be analysed for the impact of insert design on knee function, patient satisfaction and quality of life post-surgery.

Start: April 2021