300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

82 active trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Visceral Sensitivity in Women With BS and Sexual Dysfunction

This study aims to compare visceral rectal sensitivity and quality of life of 40 Irritable Bowel Syndrome women, with (20) and without sexual dysfunction (20). Both Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and sexual dysfunction (SD), decrease quality of life (QOL) separately, and only recently we have shown that quality of life decreases even more with both diseases. Thus, there is clinical evidence to search for a biological marker that explains this cumulative effect. Investigators will determine IBS using the Rome IV criteria, SD through the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) while and QOL through the Short Form-36 and the IBS-QOL. Visceral sensitivity will be evaluated by a barostat study: A small bag connected to a computer is placed in the rectum. This computer will insufflate air increasing the volume and simultaneously record the pressure inside the rectum; therefore investigators can simulate what happens when the stool reaches the rectum. The patient reports the first sensation, gas sensation, need to defecate and even pain. For patient protection the pressure will never exceed 50 mmHg and/or if any amount of pain is reported. To assess the effect of food on this visceral sensitivity, it is performed in 2 stages, fasting and 30 minutes after a standardized meal. The protocol will be carried out through 3 visits. First patients will be recruited; the diagnosis of IBS, SD, quality of life will be established and basic laboratory tests will be schedule before next visit. Second visit will be on day 7 of the menstrual cycle when investigators will carry out the barostat study and determination of blood´s sex hormones. The last visit is for the second barostat study on day 21 of the menstrual cycle with sex hormones measurement. This protocol will compare: Rectal pressure and volume for tone, first sensation, gas sensation, desire to defecate and pain, measure during fasting and postprandial periods in day 7 and 21 (estrogenic and progesterone phase) of the menstrual cycle. Other variables include (age, marital status, disease history, SF-36, IBS-QOL, etc.). This study aims to find a biological marker to explain the low QOL observed in daily clinical practice. This approach will allow us a more effective diagnosis and perhaps the creation of more effective therapeutic approaches to treat these patients. In the long term, we expect to establish the foundations of a patient-centered medicine with shared decision more effective in the gut brain axis disorders.

Start: February 2021
Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care for Comorbid Behavioral and Medical Problems

Behavioral problems are part of many of the chronic diseases that cause the majority of illness, disability and death. Tobacco, diet, physical inactivity, alcohol, drug abuse, failure to take treatment, sleep problems, anxiety, depression, and stress are major issues, especially when chronic medical problems such as heart disease, lung disease, diabetes, or kidney disease are also present. These behavioral problems can often be helped, but the current health care system doesn't do a good job of getting the right care to these patients. Behavioral health includes mental health care, substance abuse care, health behavior change, and attention to family and other psychological and social factors. Many people with behavioral health needs present to primary care and may be referred to mental health or substance abuse specialists, but this method is often unacceptable to patients. Two newer ways have been proposed for helping these patients. In co-location, a behavioral health clinician (such as a Psychologist or Social Worker) is located in or near the primary practice to increase the chance that the patient will make it to treatment. In Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH), a Behavioral Health Clinician is specially trained to work closely with the medical provider as a full member of the primary treatment team. The research question is: Does increased integration of evidence-supported behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location of providers, improve outcomes? The key decision affected by the research is at the practice level: whether and how to use behavioral health services. The investigators plan to do a randomized, parallel group clustered study of 3,000 subjects in 40 practices with co-located behavioral health services. Practices randomized to the active intervention will convert to IBH using a practice improvement method that has helped in other settings. The investigators will measure the health status of patients in each practice before and after they start using IBH. The investigators will compare the change in those outcomes to health status changes of patients in practices who have not yet started using IBH. The investigators plan to study adults who have both medical and behavioral problems, and get their care in Family Medicine clinics, General Internal Medicine practices, and Community Health Centers.

Start: April 2016
Rifaximin on Visceral Hypersensitivity

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders, with a global prevalence of 11% according to a recent meta-analysis. The total cost of managing IBS in the United States is in excess of $30 billion per year, including indirect costs relating to loss of productivity of more than $20 billion. Abdominal pain/discomfort (i.e. visceral hypersensitivity) is present in all patients with IBS and remains the most therapy-resistant symptom. Apart from abdominal pain, which is measured subjectively using visual scales, several studies have shown a significant increase in rectal sensitivity, which is measured objectively using an inflatable balloon. Drugs which are shown to have objective effects on visceral hypersensitivity are crucial in the management of IBS. While certain drugs have shown to decrease abdominal pain, there is very little data to substantiate objective changes in visceral hypersensitivity. Rifaximin is a poorly absorbed antibiotic and the exact underlying mechanism of action for rifaximin in reducing the pain component of IBS remains unknown. However, rifaximin has been shown in randomized controlled trials to decrease abdominal discomfort in all subtypes of IBS. The investigators hypothesize that rifaximin is effective in decreasing rectal visceral hypersensitivity in IBS patients. In this study, the investigators propose to test this hypothesis by measuring visceral hypersensitivity using the graded balloon distention test, before and after a course of rifaximin. To test whether this effect is accompanied by treating SIBO, the investigators will also perform lactulose breath tests before and after rifaximin therapy.

Start: July 2018