300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

200 active trials for Infertility

Mild Stimulation Protocol Using Clomiphene Citrate for Women With PCOS Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization

Infertility is of increasing significance affecting almost 48.5 million couples around the world. Anovulation is a major cause of infertility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) accounting for about 80% of women with anovulatory infertility. Ultrasound morphological features of PCOS include the presence of 16 or more follicles measuring 2-9 mm in diameter, and/or an overall large ovarian volume of >10mm3. Women with PCOS ultrasound features exhibit an exaggerated response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is an established prerequisite to assisted reproductive techniques with the aim of obtaining a higher yield of oocytes and ultimately increasing success rates. According to the ESHRE/ASRM consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome, IVF seems to represent a reasonable treatment option as the risks of multiple pregnancies and ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome may be kept to a minimum. The optimal stimulation protocol however is still debatable. Recently, patient-friendly stimulation protocols for assisted reproductive technology were introduced aiming at minimizing overall treatment costs and health hazards to the patient. Mild stimulation protocols are considered relatively novel protocols. They consist of combining oral stimulation agents (clomiphene citrate or letrozole) with low-dose gonadotropins as effective alternatives to conventional gonadotropin-only stimulation protocols. Mild stimulation protocol has been associated with better tolerance, ease of use, and comparable livebirth outcomes. The investigators aim to test the hypothesis that mild stimulation protocols could produce a similar proportion of term livebirths to conventional treatment, while reducing treatment costs and health hazards. This is a prospective non-randomized controlled trial comparing a mild ovarian stimulation protocol to conventional treatment for assisted reproductive technology at the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility - Haifa Idriss Fertility Center - American University of Beirut Medical Center.

Start: July 2019
Oral Versus Vaginal Progesterone in the Luteal Support in Cryo-warmed Embryo Transfer Cycles

In IVF/ICSI cycles, the progesterone levels induced by ovarian stimulation are low, therefore the luteal phase is supported by progesterone. The use of progestogens in IVF is associated with an improvement in the live birth rate Standard protocol for luteal phase support has not yet been established. Currently vaginal progesterone is widely used, since the classic oral progesterone seems to result in a low bioavailability and a lower pregnancy rate. However, vaginal administration of progesterone is associated with vaginal irritation, discharge and bleeding. For all these reasons, there is a need for an effective, well tolerated, and safe treatment that can improve patient satisfaction and compliance. Many studies have observed similar pregnancy rate results with dydrogesterone and micronized vaginal progesterone. A new RCT including a total of 1143 patients by Tournaye, showed that dydrogesterone treatment had a similar safety profile to micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) for luteal support as part of ART treatment. The crude pregnancy rates at 12 weeks were 37.6% and 33.1% in the dydrogesterone and MVP treatment groups respectively. Regarding the administration route of progesterone, intramuscular and transvaginal routes are the two conventional progesterone administration techniques. However, very few studies have compared the advantages of oral dydrogestrone with vaginal progesterone for luteal support in ART cycles. The objective of the investigator's study is to demonstrate the superiority of oral dydrogesterone (Duphaston) 10 over MVP (Utrogestan) used for luteal supplementation in cryo-warmed embryo transfer cycles. Upon consent, 224 patients women will be randomly allocated into either one of the study groups using a simple randomization method by computer-generated random numbers. Group I will receive the oral dydrogesterone, while group II will receive the vaginal microprogesterone.

Start: August 2018
RCT Study to Validate niPGT-A Clinical Benefit.

Chromosomal aneuploidies are linked with spontaneous miscarriages and abnormal offspring in human pregnancies. In addition, some types of aneuploidy are reported to prevent implantation. Thus, there is a need to identify the embryos with highest implantation potential on in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs. Since embryo morphology and kinetics have a weak association with embryo ploidy, trophectoderm biopsy plus Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) is becoming a very popular approach to determine the embryo chromosomal status. This technique is called Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A). Although shown to be efficient, it is invasive for the embryo, requires specific technical skills and it remains expensive. Therefore, the development of a non-invasive, rapid and cheaper method for assessing embryo ploidy status would represent a progress in the field of IVF. The non-invasive approach has been explored by some groups that analyzed the Spent Blastocyst Medium (SBM) where the embryo was incubated up to the time of transfer or freezing. In daily routine, this media is discarded after finishing the culture of the embryo. Importantly, though, this media reportedly contains traces of embryonic cell-free DNA (cfDNA) that can represent the genetic load of the embryo. On the basis of that, the hypothesis of this study is that embryo prioritization according to the analysis of the embryonic cfDNA in the SBM could improve ongoing pregnancy rate in 10 percentual points compared to standard blastocyst transfer based on morphology.

Start: June 2019
Prevalence of Uterine Malformations in Newly Married Unselected Population

Uterine malformation is occur due to the abnormal development of Mullerian canal during embryogenesis and it is known that it reduces the fertility and live birth rate and also increases the abortion and preterm birth rate. There are different classification methods have been used for defining the uterine malformations. The most common used classification method in the World is American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)'s system. In addition European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) developed a new classification system. ASRM Uterine malformation Classification which is used for diagnosis and treatment of uterine malformations in our clinic is subdivided into 7 titles: Agenesis or Hypoplasia -(a. Vaginal b. Cervical c. Fundal d. Tubal e. Combine) Unicornuate -(a. Communicating Horn b. Non-Communicating Horn c. No Cavity d. No Horn) Uterus Didelphus Bicornuate Uterus-(a. Complete b. Partial) Uterine Septum- (a. Complete b. Partial) Arcuate Uterus Diethylstilboestrol (DES) Related The diagnosis of some of the uterine malformations have been done by using two dimensional (2D) ultrasonography, hysterosalphingography or surgically (laparoscopy or laparotomy) traditionally. A non-invasive procedure is required for the diagnosis of the uterine malformation, which is evaluating both the uterine contour and endometrial cavity. In recent years frequently used three dimensional (3D) ultrasound is a non-invasive and quick diagnostic technique, and also it is sensitive as MRI. In hospital based case control studies, the frequency of uterine malformation was generally around 6%, while it was 8% in infertile patients and 12% in patients with abortion. However, there is a lack of prospective studies investigating the prevalence of uterine anomalies, fertility potential and effects on pregnancy outcomes in unselected patient groups in the literature. Therefore, at the high level evidence, there is no evidence that these anomalies affect fertility and pregnancy outcomes and should be corrected. In this study it was aimed to investigate the effects of uterine malformations on fecundability and pregnancy outcomes by evaluating the uterine morphology with 3D ultrasonography and calling for control purposes at the 1st and 2nd years of newly married women between the ages of 18-40.

Start: January 2021
Evaluating Piezo-ICSI. - The EPI Study.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has successfully been used to treat both severe male infertility and fertilization failure since its introduction in the early 1990´s. During the procedure a single sperm is injected into the cytoplasm of an oocyte to achieve fertilization. This technique is intrusive, has a relatively long learning curve and variable operator performance. A new injection technique called piezo-ICSI has recently been introduced. During piezo-ICSI, a piezo-electric effect is generated through the conversion of electric energy to mechanical energy. This causes a smooth movement of the injection pipette, which allows for steady, controlled microinjections with less psychical stress applied on the oocytes than by the conventional technique. A recent analysis, based on data from 9 different studies comparing conventional ICSI and piezo-ICSI (17500 cases), showed a benefit of piezo. Unfortunately, proper randomized trials are missing from this analysis. The proposed study is a randomized controlled study carried out at two private IVF clinics. Eligible participants are patients undergoing ICSI treatment, with a minimum of 6 oocytes. The participants will act as their own controls, with their oocytes randomly and equally divided between injection by the investigated and the conventional technique. Whether piezo-ICSI is associated with improved success rates or reduction in adverse outcomes is at present unclear. Patients with fragile oocytes may benefit more from piezo-ICSI. In patients above 35 years, piezo-ICSI has been associated with a lower oocyte degeneration rate and an increased blastocyst rate. The aim of the study is to investigate whether the piezo-ICSI technique will result in more oocytes becoming normally fertilized compared to conventional ICSI. Another proposed benefit of piezo-ICSI lies in the standardization and simplification of the ICSI procedure. Making the injection procedure more independent of operator skill may result in a more robust and predictable laboratory output.

Start: March 2021