300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

110 active trials for Infection

Topical Vancomycin for Neurosurgery Wound Prophylaxis

This study is a collaboration between New York Presbyterian (NYP)-Columbia and NYP-Cornell that seeks to evaluate the use of topical vancomycin and its reduction on surgical site infection (SSI) in neurosurgical procedures. Adult patients undergoing neurosurgery at either institution will be eligible for participation in this randomized control trial. Patients randomized to the treatment group will receive 2g of vancomycin applied as a powder or paste to the wound site and/or bone flap. Subjects in the control group will receive the current standard of care without topical vancomycin. All subjects will undergo swabbing of the anterior nares and the surgical site prior to surgery, once 10-14 days following the operation and 90 days following the operation. The primary outcome measure will be surgical site infection, assessed daily throughout the hospital stay, at the first follow-up visit, and by telephone at 14-30 days and 90 days (+/- 7 days). Secondary outcomes will include length of hospital stay, length of intensive care stay, rate of reoperation and patient mortality. In addition, systemic vancomycin levels will be assessed at 6 hours and 20 hours postoperatively in each patient. Patients who have an external ventricular drain in place will have vancomycin levels assessed daily. In patients who have cranial drains placed, vancomycin concentrations will be analyzed from daily in wound drainage. Skin and nasal flora will be analyzed to assess the impact of topical vancomycin on the patient microbiome. Although there has been a decrease in the incidence of infections following craniotomy secondary to prophylactic intravenous antibiotics, proper sterile techniques, and other interventions, SSIs continue to significantly impact morbidity, mortality, and cost burden. Although never studied in neurosurgical procedures other than instrumented spine, the application of topical vancomycin to the surgical site prior to wound closure has demonstrated a reduction in SSIs in spine, cardiac and ophthalmologic procedures. The benefits of using prophylactic vancomycin topically, as opposed to intravenously, include reduced systemic levels of the drug, and therefore, a decreased probability of adverse events related to the drug, such as inducing resistance among the native flora. The investigators propose a single-blinded randomized control trial to evaluate the effectiveness of topical vancomycin in reducing SSIs rates following neurosurgical procedures.

Start: October 2014
The Bangladesh Environmental Enteric Dysfunction Study

This is a community-based intervention study which will be undertaken at Mirpur, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Participants will be recruited from two age groups: a child cohort (age 12 to 18 months) and an adult cohort (age 18 to 45 years). The child cohort will consist of stunted children (length for age Z score, LAZ < -2), children who are at risk of stunting (length for age Z score <-1 to -2) and child controls. The adult cohort will consist of malnourished adult cases (Body Mass Index <18.5) and adult controls. After screening the participants for any organic diseases and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, they will receive nutrition interventions. Participants eligible for study will be tested for potential bio markers of environmental enteropathy (stool, urine and serum) once before and once after the nutritional intervention. Participants who will fail to respond to nutritional therapy (measured by anthropometric assessment) will become candidates for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsy. The study will include duodenal biopsies from a control group of children from University of Virginia Hospital in Charlottesville, Virginia who will undergo upper GI endoscopy as part of their clinical care as per the standard clinical protocol followed at the hospital. Adult controls (BMI > 18.5) for endoscopy will be collected from international centre for diarrhoeal disease research,Bangladesh staff clinic, Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (DMCH), Dhaka and Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka.

Start: July 2016
Post-Endoscopic Infection Rate Notifications to Improve the Delivery of Care

This project will notify centers of center's post-endoscopic infection rates and evaluate the effectiveness of this notification system to decrease infection rates. The investigators aim to notify centers of the number of patients and center's risk-adjusted rates of hospitalizations for infections after colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) procedures performed between January 2015 and September 2018. The investigators will randomize centers to two notification groups: (1) Ability to view center's rate compared with all other centers (ASCs and outpatient centers notified and compared separately) or (2) Ability to view center's rate compared with the other centers with a similar patient comorbidity profile and in addition to viewing option 1. Facilities will answer questions about center's infection control practices. The investigators hypothesize that centers with high rates of post-procedural infections will (1) be more likely to report that the center took action to investigate the center's infection control practices after the first notification and (2) observe a decrease in infections after the notification. The investigators anticipate that centers with high rates of post-procedural infections that are randomized to group 2 will have greater change. The investigators anticipate no change in rates of infection in the facilities that had zero or very low (n=1) event rates.

Start: August 2019
Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) in Hospital Practice

Infections are an important cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Infections vary greatly in severity and can be caused by viruses, bacteria, fungi or protozoa. The rapid assessment of a patient to determine whether they have an infection and whether to treat with antibiotics is essential. Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) is a (CE marked) new biomarker that has recently been studied in the emergency department (ED). This novel biomarker, which is currently available as a part of the panel of results from full blood count, holds the promise of reducing unnecessary antibiotic use and improving the outcome of patient's infections. Sepsis (blood poisoning) is a life-threatening condition that affects millions of people worldwide. The chance of dying from sepsis increases if there is a delay in treatment with the right antibiotics, but also using antibiotics incorrectly might lead to antibiotic resistance, which is dangerous for patients in the long term, as treatments might no longer work for them. An antibiotic is a substance produced naturally by microorganisms or synthetically by chemists in a laboratory. Antibiotics are capable of inhibiting the growth of or killing bacteria but are not effective against the viruses that cause many illnesses. The inappropriate use of antibiotics for these types of non-bacterial infections as well as the more frequent use of broad-spectrum antibiotics has caused the emergence of newer strains of bacteria that are resistant to many antibiotics. Rapid diagnostics are essential to accurately identify cases of sepsis that require antibiotic therapy; particularly since clinical criteria alone is often insufficient to avoid misclassifying patients with sepsis who require antibiotics. However, the high costs of current laboratory markers, along with the variable level of evidence supporting their use in sepsis and respiratory infections means that these are not in routine use. This study proposes to make use of data collected routinely at St. George's University Hospital to evaluate the accuracy of MDW as a marker for sepsis in adult patients admitted to the ED, as well as to explore its usefulness in supporting clinical decisions related to the discontinuation of antibiotic treatment in hospitalised adult patients. This observational study will not involve changes in patient management as all the data would be analysed retrospectively.

Start: July 2020
Impact of Clinical Guidance & Point-of-care CRP in Children: the ARON Project

Impact of clinical guidance & point-of-care CRP test in children: the ARON project Trial Design: multicentre, cluster-randomized, parallel group pragmatic trial Trial Participants and setting: Children aged 6 months to 12 years of age with an acute illness episode presenting to in-hours general practice or out-of-hospital community paediatrics offices Intervention(s) Diagnostic algorithm: Clinical decision tree: clinician's gut feeling something is wrong, dyspnea, temperature ?40ºC YES to any : point-of-care CRP ?5mg/L: additional testing or refer to secondary care <5mg/L: safety netting*, only prescribe antibiotics if advised (guidelines) NO to all : are AB considered? YES : point-of-care CRP ?5mg/L: safety netting*, only prescribe antibiotics if advised (guidelines) <5mg/L: safety netting*, do not prescribe antibiotics NO: safety netting *safety netting advice: inform parents on what to expect and what to look out for interactive parent information booklet based on previous research Control: Diagnosis and Treatment/Management as per usual care: - guidance on AB prescribing: o Belgische Commissie voor de Coördinatie van het Antibioticabeleid (BAPCOC) guide (updated November 2019) o RIZIV consensus meeting report "Antibiotics in children in ambulatory care" Primary Endpoint: Antibiotic prescribing rate at index consultation Secondary Endpoint(s) - time until full clinical recovery (during follow up (day 1 to day 30)) - additional investigations (at index consultation and/or during follow up (day 1 to day 30)) - re-consultation (during follow up (day 1 to day 30)) - antibiotic prescribing rate (during follow up (day 1 to day 30)) Exploratory endpoints at the index consultation: additional investigations (X-Ray, blood tests, urine tests, etc.) During a follow-up period (day 1 to day 30): - referral to hospital - additional investigations (X-Ray, blood tests, urine tests, etc.) patients with full clinical recovery at day 7 and day 30 admission to hospital mortality cost-effectiveness patient satisfaction qualitative study: endpoints Planned Sample Size: 6111 Timing of the intervention: Intervention at index consultation (at presentation to primary care) Follow-up duration: 30 days follow-up Duration of the trial (FPI-CSR): 33 months

Start: January 2021