300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

137 active trials for HIV -1 Infection

Immediate or Deferred Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention: Safe Options for Pregnant and Lactating Women

An Open Label randomized control study. To explore the safety of Truvada when used as PrEP during pregnancy and lactation. Pregnant women considered at risk for HIV infection and willing to participate in this randomized control study will be randomized to commencing PrEP in pregnancy and continued use throughout breastfeeding or deferred PrEP until breastfeeding cessation. All women will receive the standard of care for prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. Arm A: (Intervention): Standard HIV Prevention strategy plus a once daily dose of Truvada (FTC 200mg/TDF 300mg tablet) initiated in pregnancy, continuing until cessation of breastfeeding or 18 months postdelivery whichever is earliest and thereafter the option to continue PrEP post breastfeeding cessation. Arm B: (Control): Standard HIV Prevention strategy throughout pregnancy until cessation of breastfeeding plus the offer to initiate PrEP post breastfeeding cessation. Standard HIV prevention strategy includes risk reduction counselling, sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening and treatment, condom promotion and inviting the sexual partner to receive HIV counselling and testing (HCT) and referral for antiretroviral therapy (ART) if he tests positive. Main Outcome Measure: Renal function, pregnancy outcomes, bone health and infant growth. Other Outcome Measure: Incident HIV infections, adherence to PrEP, drug resistance and mother-to-child transmission of HIV.

Start: September 2017
B/F/TAF FDC in HIV-1 Infected Adolescents and Children

Cohort 1 and 2: The primary objectives of this study are: Part A: To evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics (PK) of bictegravir (BIC) and confirm the dose of the bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) 50/200/25 mg fixed dose combination (FDC) in HIV-1 infected, virologically suppressed adolescents (12 to < 18 years of age) and children (6 to < 12 years of age) Parts A and B: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the adult strength B/F/TAF FDC through Week 24 in HIV-1 infected, virologically suppressed adolescents (12 to <18 years of age) and children (6 to <12 years of age) Cohort 3: The primary objectives of this study are: Part A: To evaluate the steady state PK of BIC and confirm the dose of B/F/TAF 30/120/15 mg FDC in HIV-1 infected, virologically suppressed children ? 2 years of age weighing ? 14 to < 25 kg Parts A and B: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the low dose B/F/TAF FDC tablet through Week 24 in HIV-1 infected, virologically suppressed children ? 2 years of age weighing ? 14 to < 25 kg Cohort 4: Group 1: The primary objective of this study is: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of B/F/TAF 30/120/15 mg FDC TOS (administration of 2 B/F/TAF 15/60/7.5 mg FDC tablets for oral suspension (TOS)) through Week 24 in HIV-1 infected, virologically suppressed children ? 2 years of age weighing ? 14 to < 25 kg who are unable to swallow tablets Group 2: The primary objectives of this study are: To evaluate the steady state PK of BIC and TAF and confirm the dose of B/F/TAF 15/60/7.5 mg FDC TOS in HIV-1 infected children ? 1 month of age, on antiretroviral (ARV) treatment or treatment naive, weighing ? 10 to < 14 kg To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the B/F/TAF 15/60/7.5 mg FDC TOS through Week 24 in HIV-1 infected children ? 1 month of age, on ARV treatment or treatment naive, weighing ? 10 to < 14 kg Group 3: The primary objectives of this study are: To evaluate the steady state PK of BIC and TAF and confirm the dose of B/F/TAF 7.5/30/3.75 mg FDC TOS (administration of 2 B/F/TAF 3.75/15/1.88 mg FDC TOS) in HIV-1 infected children ? 1 month of age, on ARV treatment or treatment naive, weighing ? 6 to < 10 kg To evaluate the safety and tolerability of B/F/TAF 7.5/30/3.75 mg FDC TOS (administration of 2 B/F/TAF 3.75/15/1.88 mg FDC TOS) through Week 24 in HIV-1 infected children ? 1 month of age, on ARV treatment or treatment naive, weighing ? 6 to < 10 kg Group 4: The primary objectives of this study are: To evaluate the steady state PK of BIC and TAF and confirm the dose of B/F/TAF 3.75/15/1.88 mg FDC TOS in HIV-1 infected children ? 1 month of age, on ARV treatment or treatment naive, weighing ? 3 to < 6 kg To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the B/F/TAF 3.75/15/1.88 mg FDC TOS through Week 24 in HIV-1 infected children ? 1 month of age, on ARV treatment or treatment naive, weighing ? 3 to < 6 kg

Start: September 2016
Expedited Partner Therapy and the HIV Prevention Cascade

The HIV epidemic in Peru remains concentrated in the subpopulation of men who have sex with men (MSM), where the prevalence of disease has been estimated between 10-22% in recent epidemiologic surveys. Partner-based methods to limit the spread of HIV and STI co-infection, including partner notification and partner treatment, provide an important new strategy for HIV control in the region. Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) has been shown to reduce rates of persistent or recurrent gonorrhea and chlamydia infection in heterosexual patients, but has not been fully evaluated for use among men who have sex with men (MSM). CDC guidelines support the use of EPT for partner management with heterosexual patients, but note the absence of evidence necessary to make an equivalent recommendation for the use of EPT with MSM. Randomized clinical trials to assess the impact of EPT on partner notification, treatment, and STI re-infection among MSM are critical to the development of evidence-based partner management guidelines. As a theoretical model, EPT integrates behavioral, social, and biomedical approaches to HIV/STI control in a comprehensive prevention intervention. Our proposed exploration of the social and behavioral dimensions of partner notification and treatment will provide a methodological structure for understanding the influence of EPT on behavioral decision-making processes, interpersonal factors that influence partner notification, and network patterns of STI transmission within MSM populations in Peru. The proposed study includes a screening protocol to identify eligible MSM subjects for participation in our planned study of the effect of EPT on partner notification, treatment, and linkage to HIV prevention and care services. Potential participants will complete a behavioral survey and undergo physical examination and testing for HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia. Participants diagnosed with Gonorrhea and/or Chlamydia (at any anatomic site) will be eligible for enrollment in our Partner Management study of EPT and the HIV prevention cascade among MSM in Peru. Participants in the Partner Management study will be randomly assigned to receive either standard of care partner notification counseling or standard counseling along with a maximum of five antibiotic treatment packets to deliver to their recent sexual partners. Participants will be asked to return to the site after 21 days to report on their actual partner notification behavior, with differences in notification evaluated between the two groups. Participants will then work with a study counselor to identify their recent partners and, if the participant agrees, to provide contact information so that the study team can contact these partners. Study staff will either confirm that the partner has already been notified, or provide notification of their likely STI exposure. After informing partners of their STI exposure, staff will ask partners to provide verbal consent to a single question evaluation (whether or not the partner had previously been informed of their exposure) to verify participant-reported behavior. Partners will also be asked to visit the study site to complete a brief survey of their sexual practices and treatment-seeking behavior, as well as to undergo testing for HIV and STIs. All of the above data will be used to construct models of the spread of HIV and STIs in local MSM networks, and the potential effect of EPT on controlling the spread of STIs in this population.

Start: July 2021
Genotype-Informed Versus Empiric Management of VirEmia

HIV infection can be effectively controlled with antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, children and adolescents living with HIV and receiving ART suffer high rates of treatment failure, predominantly caused by suboptimal adherence to therapy and/or viral drug resistance. While high-income countries routinely use genotypic resistance testing (GRT) to determine which drug combinations are likely to be effective, this diagnostic tool is relatively costly and labour-intensive and is not routinely available in most resource-limited settings. GIVE MOVE is a multi-country (Lesotho, Tanzania) randomised clinical trial assessing if rapid GRT after detecting an unsuppressed viral load improves the clinical management and thus health outcomes for children and adolescents living with HIV. Children and adolescents with an unsuppressed viral load despite ART are enrolled and randomly allocated to a control or an intervention arm (50% of participants in each arm). The control arm receives care according to the current standard of care, consisting of three sessions of enhanced adherence counselling at monthly intervals, followed by a second viral load test. If the viral load remains high, the ART regimen is adjusted according to empirical guidelines; if not, the participant remains on an unchanged ART regimen. The intervention arm receives GRT and GRT-informed onward therapy; that is, in the case of drug resistance, the ART regimen is adjusted as appropriate, whereas if no (relevant) drug resistance is detected, there is no change of ART regimen. Participants in the intervention arm also receive three sessions of enhanced adherence counselling, which is informed by GRT results (i.e., if no drug resistance is detected, there is a high chance of suboptimal adherence to ART and this can be directly addressed). This trial will assess if the rapid provision of GRT improves participants' health outcomes at 9 months after enrolment. A nested study will assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of GRT. Thus, this trial will provide evidence on whether the provision of GRT for children and adolescents with HIV should be prioritised in resource-limited settings.

Start: March 2020