300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

87 active trials for Hip Fractures

Onset PrevenTIon of Urinary Retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and Rehabilitation

Urinary retention (UR) is a common problem in older people undergoing hip surgery. Untreated UR can lead to bladder distention and a permanent damage of the bladder, which can cause both physical and psychical suffering as well as increased costs for society. Even if national and international practice guidelines are in place for handling UR within the health care system, many fail to comply with them. Compliance to clinical practice guidelines are improved if different professions and managers collaborate as a team. In OPTION (Onset PrevenTIon of urinary retention in Orthopedic Nursing and rehabilitation) the investigators will coach multi-professional local facilitator teams in knowledge translation and implementation of UR practice as well as investigate the effects of such evidence-based practice in orthopedic nursing and rehabilitation. Implementation of research-based knowledge in evidence-based practice within an organization is complex with several known interacting factors. In a health care system these factors can be the care context, knowledge (innovation) and how the organization facilitates such implementations. The implementation strategy of OPTION utilize established theories of facilitation of knowledge implementation considering evidence and context with focus on leadership. The intervention consists of seminars and systematic support for implementation of UR-guidelines OPTION combine studies of adherence to evidence based practice regarding UR for patients over 65 years old that has undergone hip surgery and the health economic aspects of it. OPTION also contribute with improvements and increased knowledge regarding strategies to implement evidence based health care that can be used in other areas than UR and hip surgeries.

Start: December 2020
Smart Care for Older Persons Recovering From Hip-fracture Surgery

The proposed study aims to examine the costs and effects of a Smart Care Model using smart clothing with alarm sensors that detect fall risks and monitor/give feedback on continuously recorded daily activity levels. This mixed-method study will include a quantitative component (a randomized control trial) and a qualitative component. Data will be collected and analyzed using an embedded type of mixed method, i.e., a small qualitative component will be embedded in a larger quantitative study. Before the study, we will seek institutional review board approval. The quantitative component, a randomized experimental design, will examine the effectiveness of the Smart Care Model. The control group will receive only usual care, and the experimental group will receive Smart Care. Subjects will be recruited from the trauma wards of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) at Linkou and New Taipei Tucheng hospital. The sample will include 158 subjects, with 79 in each group. Patients and caregivers in both groups will be assessed 8 times: at admission, before discharge, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months following hospital discharge. Outcomes will include (a) patient outcomes (clinical outcomes, self-care ability, adherence, service utilization, health-related quality of life [HRQoL] and cost of care), and (b) family caregiver outcomes (preparedness, perceived balance between competing needs, depressive symptoms and HRQoL). Analyses will follow an intention-to-treat principle. The effects of the Smart Care Model on health outcomes will be analyzed by hierarchical linear models. The qualitative component will follow the collection of quantitative data. A subset of 10 patients and their family caregivers will be chosen from participants who receive Smart Care, and 10 who receive routine care for in-depth personal interviews consisting of open-ended questions. Interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed as suggested by Miles and Huberman (1994). After both quantitative and qualitative data are collected, the quantitative and qualitative results will be integrated, compared, and contrasted to fully explore the study aims.

Start: January 2020
Aggregometry in Elderlies With Hip Fracture and Receiving Clopidogrel

In elderly patients, hip fracture should be surgically treated within 48 hours from admission, since its deferral worsens the mortality. However, sometimes patients are affected by cardiovascular or cerebral comorbidities, deeming necessary the use of antiplatelets and/or anticoagulant therapies. Clopidogrel is a second-generation thienopyridine antiplatelet drug which exerts its effect by the inhibition of the platelet's purinergic receptor P2Y12 preventing adenosine diphosphate (ADP) from stimulating it. Guidelines recommend to withhold clopidogrel for 5 days before the possibility to perform neuraxial anesthesia, which is frequently the optimal perioperative management of a fragile patient. It should be mentioned however that around 30% of patients are resistant to clopidogrel and they show a normal platelet reactivity despite the antiplatelet therapy. Therefore, in principle, these patients do not require to defer surgery. We have therefore hypothesized that some patients taking clopidogrel might anticipate surgery before 5 days and within 48 hours, following a protocol based on the assessment of coagulation and platelet aggregation through thromboelastography (TEG) in combination with an ADP Platelet Mapping assay kit. After hospital admission for femur fracture, eligible patients would be evaluated by the anesthesiologist and the orthopedic physicians for anesthesia and surgery. Immediately a sample of blood should be collected for TEG with ADP Platelet Mapping test. If both MA-ADP and platelets aggregation (%) will be within normal values, the patient could be considered as candidate for immediate surgery (within 48 hours) with neuraxial anesthesia and ultrasound-guided antalgic femoral nerve block. If MA-ADP and/or platelets aggregation (%) are lower, risk for mortality should be assessed. If the patient would be considered at high risk for mortality, he/she would undergo to general anesthesia and peripheral antalgic block to not postpone surgery. Otherwise, surgery would be postponed until the normalization of both MA-ADP and platelet aggregation.

Start: December 2020
Do Mobility Technicians Provide Benefit to Patients Recovering From Hip or Lower Extremity Long Bone Fracture Surgery?

The change in Medicare payment for Surgical Hip and Femur Fracture Treatment (SHFFT) patients gave hospitals an incentive to provide higher quality care to this cohort of patients. The practice of post-operative early ambulation has been shown to improve outcomes by promoting enhanced recovery after surgery in a variety of patients, include those with SHFFT. To that end, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) is establishing a "Culture of Mobility". To do so, additional personnel are being hired to help ambulate patients with traumatic hip and femur fractures, and other fractures of the lower extremity long bones, based upon the best available evidence supporting mobility programs. The added personnel are needed as the currently available resources have insufficient bandwidth to ensure complete early mobility for all patients. The relative effectiveness of adding a dedicated resource is assumed. Although the literature suggests adding person-hours increases the amount of mobility achieved, there is an opportunity to evaluate whether this is really the case. The goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of adding the mobility technician to the usual care team in order to assist patients who could benefit from early ambulation after surgery. We hypothesize that adding a dedicated mobility technician increases the proportion of prescribed early ambulation provided to all eligible patients post-surgery, improves functional independence at discharge, and decreases length of stay since patients achieve readiness for discharge sooner than without early mobility.

Start: March 2021
Direct Anterior Approach Versus Mini Posterior Approach Versous Lateral Approach for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures

In general, hip fractures in the elderly are associated with a high one year-mortality up to 36 %. Apart from choosing the proper treatment, optimizing the surgical technique itself offers options to improve the outcome. Early mobilization after hip hemi¬arthroplasty correlates with improved ambulation, reduced need for assisted transfers, and less use of extended care facilities after hospital discharge. Nowadays, in order to reduce soft tissue damage and gain quicker postoperative recovery and faster rehabilitation, various MIS techniques have been proposed. Two of these techniques are the mini posterior approach and the mini direct anterior approach. The direct anterior approach was developed as a true internervous and intermuscular surgical approach with proposed benefits of faster recovery, quicker return to function, and less pain. In theory, the direct anterior approach should cause less tissue damage than mini posterior approach, as it is performed through a plane between neurlogical tissue and intermuscular plane without muscle transection. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the direct anterior approach for bipolar head endoprosthetic hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures in comparison with the mini posterior approach and the traditional lateral approach, for the treatment of the same fractures. The investigators hypothesized that patients undergoing the direct anterior approach would have better clinical and radiological results in comparison with the mini posterior and lateral approach.

Start: November 2020