300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

103 active trials for Glioblastoma Multiforme

Tamoxifen Versus Lomustine After First Recurrence in GBM Patients

The treatment of recurrence in GBM remains controversial and there is no evidence-informed standard second-line therapy. Generally worldwide, lomustine is the most commonly used agent at first progression despite moderate efficacy and high rates of serious toxicities. Therefore, there is a need for alternative chemotherapeutic agents that are superior or have at least equivalent efficacy as lomustine but less toxicity. In a retrospective review of our centre using tamoxifen in recurrent glioma, the use of tamoxifen as a single agent in 167 patients, typically as third line treatment or beyond, resulted in at least stable disease for approximately 20% of patients with a median survival of >20 months for recurrent non-GBM and >10 months for recurrent GBM. Tamoxifen was well tolerated with no toxicities reported. Tamoxifen may be a better alternative to lomustine where only 20% of patients treated are alive in six months, typically with high rates of toxicity. Primary Objective ? To compare one-year progression-free survival rate of lomustine and tamoxifen treatment in patients with first recurrence of GBM. Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the overall survival following treatment in both arms To evaluate adverse events reported following treatment in both arms To evaluate health-related quality-of-life as assessed EORTC QLQ-BN20 questionnaires in both arms Treatment plan includes: Arm 1: Lomustine 110 mg/m2 as a single dose at bedtime on day 1 only every 42 days cycle Arm 2: Tamoxifen 20 mg daily for 3 days then 20 mg BID for 3 days then increase by 20 mg daily every 3 days until 100 mg BID, continuously

Start: June 2021
Chemoradiotherapy Versus Biomarker-Guided Therapy for Elderly and Frail GBM Patients

Currently, the optimal treatment regimen for elderly Glioblastoma (GBM) patients with poor performance status (PS) is unknown. Based on data for elderly GBM patients and the limited data for patients with poor PS, hypofractionated RT or a short course of Temozolomide (TMZ) may provide survival benefit without the added toxicity and inconvenience of a more protracted treatment regimen. In particular, treatment with RT or TMZ monotherapy on the basis of methylated O6 - methyl guanine - DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, followed by the alternative therapy at progression, may provide a safe and effective treatment regimen for patients with poor PS. The hypothesis of this trial is that in elderly GBM patients with poor performance status (age ? 65 years and KPS 50-70), a biomarker-guided approach to therapy results in non-inferior overall survival compared to combined TMZ/RT. Specifically, biomarker-guided therapy will consist of TMZ monotherapy for patients with a methylated MGMT promoter, and hypofractionated RT (40 Gy in 15 fractions) for patients with a non-methylated MGMT promoter. It is hypothesized that biomarker-guided therapy will result in non-inferior progression-free survival, reduced toxicity and increased cost-effectiveness compared to combined chemoradiotherapy. Primary objective: • To compare overall survival of standard vs biomarker-guided therapy in elderly and frail patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Secondary objective: To evaluate progression-free survival following treatment in both arms. To evaluate adverse events according to CTCAE criteria in both arms. To evaluate health-related quality-of-life as assessed by MMSE and EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-BN20 questionnaires in both arms. To evaluate cost-effectiveness of standard vs biomarker-guided therapy Methods: Patients will be randomized to two treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio. Standard Arm: TMZ with concurrent RT (combined modality arm) Patients will receive 15 days of TMZ daily with concurrent RT. TMZ will be delivered at a dose of 75 mg/m2, given daily with RT. TMZ will be administered 1 hour before each session of RT. After a 4-week break, patients will receive six cycles of adjuvant TMZ according to the standard 5-day schedule (days 1-5) every 28 days, up to 6 cycles as tolerated by the patient. The dose will be 150 mg/m2 for the first cycle and increased to 200 mg/m2 beginning with the second cycle, so long as there are no hematologic adverse events, intractable nausea or fatigue. Investigational Arm: Biomarker based treatment MGMT (+): TMZ monotherapy Patients will receive TMZ at a dose of 75 mg/m2 daily for 15 days on weekdays (Monday through Friday). This will be followed by six cycles of TMZ according to the standard 5-day schedule (days 1-5) every 28 days. The dose will be 150 mg/m2 for the first cycle and increased to 200 mg/m2 beginning with the second cycle, so long as there are no hematologic adverse events. Dose will be determined using the body surface area (BSA) calculation. MGMT methylation (-): No TMZ will be given. Participants will receive radiation treatment with 40Gy / 15 fractions over a period of 21 days (3 weeks). Upon treatment completion, participants will be followed by every 3 months for 2 years and every 6 months for years 3-5. Response and progression will be evaluated using the new international criteria proposed by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group (RANO).

Start: July 2021
UNIty-Based MR-Linac Guided AdapTive RadiothErapy for High GraDe Glioma: A Phase 2 Trial

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a high grade glioma (brain tumor) that is treated with surgery or biopsy followed by radiotherapy (RT) given daily over 3 or 6 weeks with or without an oral chemotherapy. Radiation is targeted to the visible residual tumor on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images plus a large margin of 15 to 30 mm to account for possible cancer cells outside the visible tumor and for potential growth or shifts in tumor position throughout the prolonged RT course. Standard RT uses MRI to create a reference plan (with large margins) and treats that same volume every day. This exposes a large amount of healthy brain tissue to radiation leading to toxicity and reduced quality of life. A new technology, the MR-Linac, combines an MRI scanner and a Linac (radiation delivery machine) into one unit. This allows for "adaptive" RT by obtaining an updated MRI scan each day just prior to treatment, adapting the RT plan to take into account any changes in the tumor or the patient's anatomy on that given day. This allows for a smaller (5 mm) margin on the visible tumor as its position can be tracked daily. The goal of this study is to use adaptive RT with small margins to demonstrate that the local control of the visible tumor is not compromised compared to the large volumes used with standard non-adaptive RT, while determining whether smaller margins lead to decreased radiation toxicity and therefore improved quality of life by minimizing radiation exposure.

Start: March 2021