300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

454 active trials for Diabetes Mellitus - Type 2

Subsidized Healthy Food Prescription Program

It is important for individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to adhere to a healthy dietary pattern to maintain optimal blood glucose levels and overall health. The increasing costs of healthy foods, however, is a barrier to maintaining healthful dietary patterns, particularly for individuals with T2DM who are experiencing food insecurity (i.e., inadequate or insecure access to food due to financial constraints). Lower diet quality may result in difficulties maintaining optimal blood glucose levels, leading to higher rates of diabetes complications, and increased acute care usage and costs. Effective strategies to address this issue are lacking despite the well-known impact of food insecurity on maintaining optimal blood glucose levels. One way to address this problem is to provide subsidies to purchase healthy foods through a subsidized healthy food prescription program. These programs may help to reduce food insecurity and improve diet quality, thereby improving blood glucose control and reducing diabetes complications over time. This study will investigate the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) of a subsidized healthy food prescription program among adults who are experiencing food insecurity and persistent hyperglycemia through three concurrent studies; a randomized controlled trial, an implementation study, and a modelling study. The randomized controlled trial will examine the effectiveness of a subsidized healthy food prescription program compared to a healthy food prescription only in reducing blood glucose levels among adults who are experiencing food insecurity and persistent hyperglycemia.

Start: April 2021
Improving Glycaemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Through Peer Support Instant Messaging

Diabetes mellitus is one of the four priority non-communicable diseases worldwide. Globally, 425 million adults suffered from diabetes mellitus (7.2-11.3%) in 2017 and the International Diabetes Federation estimates an increase of 48% of the prevalence until 2045. Type 2 diabetes, which is the most common type of diabetes, is mainly seen in adults older than 40 years. Diabetes can lead to serious long-term complications as well as a lower quality of life, worse mental health, and a reduced life expectancy. These health consequences produce significant health care costs. Due to the chronical character of diabetes, the disease requires continuous therapy, regular medical appointments, and good adherence of those suffering. Therefore, diabetes self-management education (DSME) plays a significant role to increase patient's self-management capacity and improve diabetes therapy. Research indicates that these outcomes might be difficult to maintain and seem to decline soon after DSME ends. Consequently, effective strategies to preserve the positive effects of DSME are needed. Preliminary results show that peer support, which means support from a person who has experiential knowledge of a specific behaviour or stressor and similar characteristics as the target population, is associated with better outcomes in terms of HbA1c, cardiovascular disease risk factors or self-efficacy at lower cost compared to standard therapy. Although those results are promising, research on peer support in diabetes care is still in its infancy and the influence of various factors is unclear. Peer support instant messaging services (IMS) approaches have significant potential for diabetes management because support can be provided easily and prompt, is inexpensive, and needs less effort to attend compared to standard therapy. Furthermore, almost half of the 40-69-year-old age group, which is mostly affected by the onset of type 2 diabetes, use IMS. The major objective of the project is to analyse the impact of a peer supported IMS intervention in addition to a standard diabetes therapy on the glycaemic control of type 2 diabetic patients. A total of 205 participants (196 participants and 9 moderators) with type 2 diabetes mellitus, older than 40 years will be included and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Both groups will receive standard therapy, but the intervention group will use the peer support IMS tool, additionally. The duration of the intervention will last for seven months, followed by a follow-up of seven months. Biochemical, behavioural, and psychosocial parameters will be measured before, in the middle, and after the intervention as well as after the follow-up.

Start: November 2020
GLucose Monitoring Programme SingaporE, Phase 2 (GLiMPSE2)

Many with type 2 diabetes (T2D) remain sub-optimally controlled. Structured programmes requiring dietary and lifestyle intervention have been shown to improve control but are time-and labour-intensive. The role for self-monitoring of blood glucose with capillary blood glucose (CBG) readings is uncertain. The use of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) with education may effect improvements in awareness and self-management behaviour and hence glycaemic control. The investigators aim to compare the effects of FGM versus CBG fingersticks in the context of a structured education programme over a 6-month period in adults with type 2 diabetes. 200 adults (>21y) with sub-optimally controlled T2D (7.5-10%) on either diet-controlled, oral glucose lowering drugs or background insulin will be enrolled and randomised into the intervention arm (FGM and education) or control arm (capillary glucose fingersticks and education). The intervention arm will monitor glucose using FGM continuously for 6 weeks and intermittently thereafter up to 24 weeks. The control group will monitor glucose using CBG fingersticks up to 24 weeks. During the intervention period(0-24w), both arms will undergo the same schedule of visits (-2w, 0w, 8w, 16w, 24w) and 6 education sessions. Both groups will be followed up at weeks 38 and 52. Primary outcome is HbA1c change from baseline at 24 weeks. This study will provide novel data on the use of FGM versus CBG in Type 2 diabetes and its impact on glycaemic control.

Start: December 2020