300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

132 active trials for Diabetes Mellitus - Type 1

An Open-label, Two-center, Randomized, Cross-over Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Glycemic Control Using Hybrid-closed Loop vs. Advanced Hybrid Closed-loop in Young Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes

Closed-loop systems are becoming an integral part of diabetes management. These systems were uniformly proven to improve glycemic control, reduce hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia while modestly reducing HbA1c levels and improving quality of life. While overnight control is close to optimal under closed loop control, postprandial hyperglycemia during daytime remains a challenge. The advanced hybrid closed loop system was designed with an improved auto-basal control and additional auto-bolus module that delivers correction boluses automatically. In addition, this system was developed to improve user experience by significantly reducing the amount of alarms and exits from Auto Mode. Therefore, this system might have an advance in treating hyperglycemia over the hybrid closed loop that controls glucose levels by modulation of insulin basal rate only. Therefore, we propose the current study that will compare 6 weeks glycemic control using hybrid closed loop versus advanced hybrid closed loop that add correction boluses among young children and adolescents. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of 6 weeks glucose control using Hybrid Closed Loop (HCL-670G) compared to Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop System (AHCL- 670G) in young subjects with sub-optimally controlled type 1 diabetes. A total of 28 subjects (age 7-14 years) will be enrolled at two investigational centers. At the end of the cross-over study participants will be offered with an extension period, during which they will be offered to use their preferred closed-loop system for another 3 months

Start: July 2020
French National Cohort of People With Type 1 Diabetes

Cardiovascular (CV) diseases are the most frequent type 1 diabetes (T1D) complications. A recent epidemiological study showed that patients with T1D have a two-fold CV mortality risk, even in case of good glycemic control. In addition, it has been shown that patients with T1D with no traditional CV risk factors had about a 80% higher risk of cardiovascular event compared to non-diabetic individuals. This indicates that further modifiable risk factors in relation to CV mortality remain to be identified. One of the candidates that could help to disentangle the factors associated with the increased CV mortality in T1D patients is glycemic variability which could contribute to diabetes complications. Indeed, severe hypoglycaemia, one of the most severe consequence of glycaemic variability, are associated with a higher mortality in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In order to evaluate the relation between glycemic variability, insulin therapy modalities and CV risk as well as some other questions related to health determinants of T1D, we are building up a large observational, prospective, multi-centric cohort study of patients gathering 15,000 patients with T1D, age above 6 years old, to perform the following: Collecting clinical information Evaluating Glycemic variability (assessed by the coefficient of variation of glucose (CV) calculated from automatically downloaded continuous glucose monitoring data (CGM) Biobanking including plasma, DNA, urine, saliva and hair. Collecting patients' reported outcomes through auto-questionnaires (online questionnaires). Doing an active follow-up for a period of 30 years with an intermediate visit every 3 years. We plan to link the data to national Health data system (Système National de Données de Santé, SNDS) in order to exhaustively collect health events as death, CV events and hospitalizations (including severe hypoglycemia).

Start: June 2020
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise-related Hypoglycaemia in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes (Hypo Heart Exercise)

Patients with type 1 diabetes are recommended to perform at least 150 minutes of accumulated physical activity each week, however fear of hypoglycaemia is a well-known barrier to exercise in these patients. Previous experimental studies have almost exclusively focused on investigating cardiovascular effects of hypoglycaemia under resting conditions, however other underlying circumstances prior to or during a hypoglycaemic event, (e.g. exercise) are rarely discussed in the literature but might, nevertheless, be of significant clinical importance. In this study, the investigators aim to investigate the QT interval dynamics and prothrombotic factors during exercise-related hypoglycaemia in comparison with hypoglycaemia under resting conditions, in patients with type 1 diabetes. Fifteen patients with type 1 diabetes will be recruited for a crossover study including two test days, a combined euglycaemic- hypoglycaemic clamp combined with an exercise session and an euglycaemic- hypoglycaemic clamp during bed rest, respectively. Furthermore, the participants will be schedueled for a 24-hours followup visit after each test day for the purpose of investigating prolonged prothrombotic effects of hypoglycaemia. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to start with the combined exercise-clamp or the resting-clamp. The two test days will be separated by at least 4 weeks to minimise carry-over effects. A group of fifteen healthy individuals with normal glucose tolerance matched for age, gender and body mass index, will be recruited for a single blood test aiming to compare baseline coagulation status with patients with type 1 diabetes.

Start: September 2020