300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

120 active trials for Delirium

Does Rocking Charis Calm Delirious Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Background: Delirium among patients admitted to an ICU is a common condition associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To this point no evidence-based prevention or treatment exist for delirium. Non-pharmacological interventions such as early mobilization and systematic bundle of care have been suggested to decrease the number of days of delirium. So far there exist no studies exploring if delirious patients benefit or not when mobilized to a rocking chair with music therapy. Objectives: To assess if rocking chair therapy can decrease the burden of delirium in adult, critical ill patients admitted to an ICU. Design: A clinical initiated multicenter randomized non-blinded trial, of delirious patients mobilized to a rocking chair versus no rocking chair. Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Adult intensive care patients (18 years and above) diagnosed with delirium with a validated screening tool. Exclusion criteria: if the patient is evaluated not to be mobilized to a rocking chair and expressing discomfort and do not wish to be mobilized, a patient with critical illness neuropati, patients with lever coma, patient in ECM treatment, patients that are mentally permanently incompetent, not receiving active life support if needed, weight more that 130 kg, if informed consent cannot be obtained, if the patient is admitted because of suicide attempt and is the patient have delirium tremens. Intervention: The experimental intervention is a 20 min. long rocking chair with music therapy. Control intervention is also transferred to the rocking chair, but the therapy program will not be turned on. Standardized pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for delirium will continue for both groups. Delirium and consciousness will be evaluated twice a day. Outcomes: Primary outcome: number of days alive without coma and delirium in the ICU. Secondary outcome: Number of days admitted to the ICU and number of patients with at least one difference in RASS score before end after the experimental intervention. Trial size: A power calculation have estimated that a total number of 76 patients with delirium should be included in each study group. Time schedule: We estimate that the inclusion period and follow up will as long as 1 year from the time the first patient is randomized.

Start: June 2020
Simultaneous Recumbent Cycling and Cognitive Training

Intensive care units (ICU) provide life-saving care for nearly five million people annually. Up to 80% of patients receiving care in an ICU experience at least one episode of delirium. Delirium, an acute episodic display of confused thinking and unawareness, predicts impaired cognition and accelerated cognitive decline which negatively impacts quality of life (QOL) long after hospital discharge. The average age of ICU patients is 52 years. These middle-age (MA) ICU survivors need cognitive interventions that are well planned, accessible, and effective to improve cognition and prevent accelerated decline so they can resume their previous QOL and enter older age with optimized cognitive function. Physical exercise and cognitive training independently improve cognition and emerging evidence indicates that combining these two approaches produces even greater effects on cognition. Community-based rehabilitation centers are accessible for MAICU survivors to engage in physical activity; cognitive training could easily be added. Approaches in which a patient engages in physical exercise and cognitive training concurrently is an understudied intervention for all ICU survivors, especially those who are middle-aged. Study aims are to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a simultaneous recumbent cycling and cognitive training intervention (SRCCT) for MAICU survivors who experienced at least one delirium episode during their ICU stay. Feasibility will be determined by systematically evaluating research team training, participant recruitment, randomization, implementation, and intervention fidelity. Acceptability will be evaluated via a satisfaction, preferences, burden, and participant-suggested improvements survey. The SRCCT effect sizes will be calculated comparing multiple data point cognition scores between an SRCCT group and a usual care control group. Upon completion, investigators expect to understand the feasibility and acceptability of the SRCCT delivered in community-based rehabilitation centers, and the combined effect of SRCCT on cognition and QOL for middle-aged ICU survivors who experienced an episode of ICU delirium. The hypothesis is that study participants who engage in physical exercise and cognitive training concurrently will have a greater improvement in cognition and QOL than physical exercise training alone.

Start: January 2021
Absent Visitors: The Wider Implications of COVID-19 on Non-COVID Cardiothoracic ICU Patients, Relatives and Staff

Patients are part of a family network. When any person in a family becomes critically unwell and requires the assistance of an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), this has an impact on all members of that family. COVID-19 changed visiting for all patients in hospitals across Scotland. It is not known what effect these restrictions will have on patients' recovery, nor do we understand the impact it may have on their relatives or staff caring for them. This study will look at the implications of the visiting restrictions as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic upon patients without COVID-19 who are in the cardiothoracic ICU. It will also explore the impact of these restrictions on them, their relatives and staff. This study will be carried out within a single specialised intensive care unit in Scotland using mixed methods. The first arm of this study will use retrospective data that is routinely collected in normal clinical practice. The investigators will compare patient outcomes prior to COVID-19 with outcomes following the implementation of COVID-19 visiting restrictions. The aim is to establish if the restrictions on visiting has an impact on the duration of delirium. Delirium is an acute mental confusion and is associated with longer hospital stays and worse outcomes in this patient group. The second arm of this study involves semi-structured interviews with patients, relatives and staff that will allow deeper exploration of the issues around current visiting policy. The interviews will last approximately 1 hour and will address these issues. They will then be transcribed word for word and analysed using grounded theory, meaning the theories will develop from the data as it is analysed.

Start: September 2020