300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

55 active trials for COPD Exacerbation

Nasal High-Flow in COPD

Rationale: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a disease with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. COPD exacerbations are the important contributor to disease deterioration and decrease in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Since therapeutic options to treat exacerbations effectively are limited, many patients have persistent loss of vital functioning and suffer from frequent re-hospitalisations. Nasal high flow therapy (nHFT) is an innovative therapy that provides humidified and heated air through a nasal cannula. Although there is some preliminary evidence that nHFT is effective in stable COPD patients, there are no data at all regarding the effectiveness of nHFT in COPD exacerbations. A key problem in the implementation of nHFT is that the underlying working mechanisms are not clear and therefore the appropriate way to apply nHFT is unknown. Objective: The aim of the present study is to prove efficacy of nHFT in enhancing recovery from COPD exacerbations. We aim to improve the effectiveness of nHFT by developing new technologies to control and monitor the effect of nHFT and by providing background for optimal settings of nHFT. Study design: The study will be designed as a multicentre randomised controlled trial, with the University Medical Center Groningen, the "Medisch Spectrum Twente", "Albert Schweizer ziekenhuis", Rijnstate hospital, and the University of Twente, collaborating. Study population: One hundred thirty-six patients with known COPD GOLD stage II to IV and hypoxemic respiratory failure hospitalised with a COPD exacerbation will be included. Intervention (if applicable): Patients will be randomised to standard care or nHFT (? 6 hours/day) during hospitalisation and the 90 days after discharge, as added to standard care. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome will be improvement in HRQoL after 90 days.

Start: October 2018
Influence of Respiratory Mechanics on Diaphragmatic Dysfunction in COPD Patients Who Have Failed NIV (RHYDIAN)

Although non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) is the gold standard treatment for patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) who develop respiratory acidosis, failure rate are still high ranging from 5% to 40%. Recent studies have shown that the onset of severe diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD) during AECOPD increases risk of NIV failure and mortality in this subset of patients. Although the imbalance between the load and the contractile capacity of inspiratory muscles seems the main cause of AECOPD-induced hypercapnic respiratory failure, data regarding the influence of mechanical derangement on diaphragmatic performance in this acute phase are lacking. With this study we aim at investigating the impact of respiratory mechanics on diaphragm function in AECOPD patients who experienced NIV failure. AECOPD with respiratory acidosis admitted to the ICU of the University Hospital of Modena from 2017-2018 undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) due to NIV failure were enrolled. The study protocol consisted of two consecutive phases; in the first step measurements of static respiratory mechanics and end expiratory lung volume (EELV) were performed after 30 minutes of MV in volume control mode. In the second step transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) was calculated by means of a sniff maneuver (Maximal Pdi) after 30 minutes of spontaneous breathing trial. Linear regression analysis and Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to asses the association between Maximal Pdi values and static and dynamic mechanical features and the association between Maximal Pdi and Pdi/Maximal Pdi.

Start: January 2017
Comparing Mortality for Low vs High Peripheral Oxygen Saturation in COPD-patients With Acute Exacerbation

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disorder that affects approximately 400,000 Danish citizens. About 3,000-3,500 Danes die yearly because of the disorder, and the costs associated with hospital admissions are estimated to be 535 million Danish kroner (DKK). Patients with COPD risk a worsening of their disorder, and in most cases, this will require hospitalization. One of the used treatments is providing oxygen to the patients via e.g. masks. The recommendations on oxygen treatment are currently based on a study from 2010 where 37% of the participants in this study did not receive the intended treatment, which may have had massive effects on the results. It is worrying that no other studies have shown which oxygen treatment is safest for the patients. As such, we deem it important to study how best to treat the patients. Our study is of high clinical relevance as hospitals receive patients with worsening of COPD daily. We need more, better data regarding the oxygen treatment of our patients, in order to provide our patients with the best possible care. The purpose of our study is thus to determine which oxygen treatment is best for patients with acute worsening of COPD symptoms. We will use a prospective, randomized controlled open-label trial. We will use two treatments: Treatment 1 is giving oxygen to the patient to reach a peripheral oxygen saturation of above 94%. Treatment 2 is giving oxygen to reach a peripheral oxygen saturation of between 88% and 92%. Our primary outcome is 30-day all-cause mortality, with secondary outcomes being 7-day all-cause mortality, need for non-invasive ventilation, intubation or intensive care admission, over-all length of hospital stay and respiratory acidosis. We believe that a lower oxygen saturation percentage may be superior as one study (Austin et al., 2010) showed a lower mortality rate in the group of patients that had a lower peripheral oxygen saturation. Additionally, the risk of respiratory acidosis and hypercapnia were lower. We wish to perform our study in the hospital sector as this study was performed in the prehospital sector and thus their results cannot be translated directly.

Start: February 2020
The Effect of Incentive Spirometry Added to Routine Physiotherapy Program on Hemodynamic Responses and Hospital Stay in Patients With COPD Exacerbation

COPD; it is a common, preventable and treatable disease that is associated with increased chronic inflammatory responses in the airways and lungs against harmful gases and particles, and that it manages progressive airflow. The definition of exacerbation is defined as an acute onset with a change in where daily differences in the main symptoms occur and which may occur with the presence of drugs. The number of exacerbations in the course of the disease is between 1-3 years on average. Routine physiotherapy treatment in COPD exacerbation is expected to increase lung volume and effective removal of airway secretions. The concept of physiotherapy programs is vibration, thoracic expression exercise, positive expiratory pressure therapy and gait programs. An incentive spirometer is a simple, inexpensive device to adjust lung tissue re-expansion by increasing lung volumes and diaphragmatic mobility, providing maximal inspiration with termination control without a resistive loading. In COPD patients, the use of incentive spirometry is to increase alveolar ventilation and oxygenation in lifestyle. There are a limited number of studies in the literature regarding the results of the use of incentive spirometry in COPD patients. The results of postoperative results of incentive spirometry in COPD patients were tried and established on pulmonary complications, diseases, postoperative dyspnea perception and lifestyle. The importance of the investigator's research; this is the first study to evaluate hemodynamic responses and hospitalization plans of incentive spirometer and routine physiotherapy program in COPD exacerbations.

Start: August 2020
Eosinophil-driven Corticotherapy for Patients Hospitalized for COPD Exacerbation

The primary objective of this study is to compare treatment failure rates between a group of eosinophilic (eosinophilia > 2% on day 1 of hospitalization) patients hospitalised for a COPD exacerbation treated via corticotherapy versus a similar group treated via placebo. Secondarily, treatment failure rates will also be compared between a group of non-eosinophilic patients hospitalised for a COPD exacerbation treated via corticotherapy versus a similar group treated via placebo. Study arms will also be compared for additional aspects of efficacy and safety: speed of recovery during the initial hospitalization; corticosteroid side effects / induced comorbidities; changes in symptoms and episodes of exacerbation; pulmonary function, oxygen use and ventilation; patient trajectories and resource use (e.g. survival, consults, episodes of hospitalization, medications); drug consumption (especially as relates to COPD management, exacerbations and induced comorbidities); health status, quality of life, activity/disability; patient safety / adverse events in general. Eosinophilia thresholds optimizing the prediction of corticosteroid response and COPD outcomes will be re-evaluated. The relationships between corticosteroid response and key biomarkers (e.g. infectious groups) will be thoroughly explored, including within eosinophil strata. Potential gender subgroups differences will also be evaluated. Finally, in prevision of further exploratory studies, a biological collection and an imaging library will be created in association with this protocol. The biological collection will be used to explore the genetic basis and physiology linked with treatment response, gender and patient trajectories. The image library will be used as a platform for the exploration of new imaging markers developed, for example, via machine learning and affiliated techniques.

Start: September 2020