300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

105 active trials for Colorectal Neoplasms

Chromoendoscopy or Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) for Improving Adenoma Detection in Colonoscopy

Narrow band imaging or electronic chromoendoscopy might provide similar adenoma detection capabilities while limiting time spent when compared to conventional chromoendoscopy method.

Start: April 2020

PIPAC for the Treatment of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases

This study would like to assess the efficacy of pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). This technique delivers chemotherapy directly into the abdomen via a less invasive laparoscopic or 'keyhole' form of surgery. This type of chemotherapy takes the form of an aerosol, similar to the spray of a deodorant for example. The aerosol is administered into the abdomen under pressure, pushing the chemotherapy deeper into the tissues and cancer. This approach does not involve any surgical removal of the cancer.

Start: February 2019

Effects of Anesthetic Techniques on Time to Start of Adjuvant Chemotherapy, and Early and Late Outcomes Following Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world with a high postoperative mortality (2 - 6%) as well as a low 5-year survival (40%). Despite advances in surgery and the use of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery in recent years and adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery, long-term prognosis has only improved marginally. Epidural analgesia is commonly used as a part of the perioperative management of patients undergoing open, colorectal cancer surgery. Not only does it reduce pain and stress, epidurals have been shown to reduce perioperative inflammation and preserve immunological function, all of which may be beneficial in perioperative tumorigenesis. In several retrospective studies, anesthesia and choice of analgesia have shown to improve long-term survival, but no randomized studies have been published in the literature today. Similarly, the benefits of propofol anesthesia in comparison to inhalational anesthesia have recently been high-lighted in relation to cancer surgery, and many patients today request the use of epidurals, total intravenous anesthesia and loco-regional anesthetic technique during surgery, without clear evidence from prospective studies in the literature. Therefore, the question as to the real benefit of anesthesia technique in postoperative outcomes and tumor recurrence remain unanswered, and skepticism abounds amongst both surgeons and anesthesiologists. It is therefore important to study short- and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing CRC surgery, comparing epidural vs. no epidural or inhalational vs. total intravenous anesthesia. However, prospective, randomized studies are costly, require many patients, and the benefits of choice of anesthesia and analgesia on outcome remain uncertain from the current literature. There is a clear diffusion in practice across the world in the choice of anesthesia for patients undergoing CRC surgery, a lack of evidence in the literature and an absence of guidelines on best practice anesthesia care. We believe that by performing a large, prospective, observational, international, pragmatic study, with low costs, it will be possible to answer some of the important questions pertaining to the choice of anesthesia and analgesia. The clinical trials network at the European Society of Anesthesiology will play an important role in the success of this study.

Start: April 2021

FOLFIRI + Panitumumab First-line Treatment in Elderly Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, RAS/BRAF Wild-type and Good Performance Status

To estimate progression-free survival at one year in elderly patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type unresectable mCRC and good performance status treated with FOLFIRI + panitumumab as first-line therapy. The clinical hypothesis of this study is that the combination of panitumumab and FOLFIRI is a good treatment option in elderly patients with good performance status and RAS/BRAF wild-type unresectable mCRC. Another purpose of this clinical trial is to determine the RAS/BRAF mutation status in liquid biopsies at baseline and at the time of disease progression.

Start: October 2017

A Phase 2 Randomized, Open-Label Study of RRx-001 vs Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

This two-stage study is designed to compare the safety and activity between RRx-001 against regorafenib followed by irinotecan-based therapies in a parallel comparative study. Patients who are suffering from advanced or metastatic (meaning the disease has spread) colorectal cancer are invited to participate in this study. There will be two groups of patients (Randomized, open label study), one of these will receive RRx-001 and the other one will receive regorafenib. If patients qualify to participate in this study, they will be randomly assigned to the 'interventional arm' where patients will receive the experimental drug, RRx-001, or the 'control arm' where they will receive the current standard-of-care, Regorafenib. Patients have a 66% chance (2 out of 3) of receiving RRx-001 and a 33 % chance (1 out of 3) of receiving regorafenib. On progression in the first part of the study, provided ECOG performance status is adequate, and if clinically appropriate i.e. there are no absolute or relative contraindications in the opinion of the Investigator, all subjects will enter the second part of the study and receive irinotecan plus bevacizumab. Whether patients are given RRx-001 or regorafenib, they will also receive best supportive care, which includes treatments to help manage side effects and symptoms of cancer. This is an open label study, which means patients will know to which of these treatments, RRx-001 or regorafenib, they are assigned.

Start: May 2014

Breath Analysis as an Additional Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening to Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Colonoscopies

In the past decade, the demand for colonoscopy procedures has increased significantly since the introduction of population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in many western countries. Post-polypectomy surveillance will increase the number of colonoscopy procedures conducted each year even further. The invasive nature of colonoscopy and the associated health-care costs warrant the development of a new non-invasive test to reduce the number of unnecessary colonoscopies. These days, many countries use a non-invasive fecal test for CRC screening which is easy to perform at home, but test characteristics such as sensitivity and specificity are suboptimal. Multiple studies have already shown that volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis has a high diagnostic accuracy for CRC and Advanced Adenomas. An additional VOC analysis, for example through breath testing, in patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) may reduce the number of unnecessary colonoscopies. The aim of this study is to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the AeonoseTM to distinguish patients with CRC from healthy controls, and to assess reproducibility of test results.

Start: May 2020

Pembrolizumab in MMR-Proficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Pharmacologically Primed to Trigger Hypermutation Status

In this study, MMRd metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who failed standard therapies will undergo treatment with pembrolizumab, while RAS-extended mutated MMR-proficient mCRC patients will be tested for o6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) expression (IHC) and then for MGMT promoter methylation. MGMT IHC-negative, promoter methylation positive patients will be treated with temozolomide (TMZ). Patients progressing under temozolomide will be tested for tumor mutational burden (TMB) and proceed to pembrolizumab if TMB is > 20 mutations/Mb. The primary study hypothesis is that tumors with acquired resistance to temozolomide become hypermutated and are sensitive to pembrolizumab.

Start: January 2019

Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases With Immunotherapy and Bevacizumab

Liver is the most common site of metastases from colorectal cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with targeted agents is usually recommended for borderline-resectable liver metastases that are technically difficult to resect for conversion to resectable disease and control of metastatic spread. However, the prognosis of these patients are still poor, and long term disease-free survival over 3 years is rare and <20%. More effective measures to prevent recurrence are needed before or after resection of colorectal liver metastases.

Start: May 2019

Longitudinal Incision Versus Cruciate Incision in the Construction of an End Colostomy

TITLE: "Incidence of parastomal hernia: Randomized clinical trial comparing the longitudinal fascial incision (" Hepworth hitch ") vs. cruciate incision in the exteriorization of a end colostomy ". DESIGN: Randomized, open and parallel clinical trial so patients will be assigned to the cruciate incision group or longitudinal incision with a 1: 1 allocation ratio. POPULATION: Patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery a definitive end colostomy. OBJECTIVES: The main objective is to compare the parastomal hernia rate diagnosed by imaging at 2 years after surgery. Secondary objectives are: Clinically relevant parastomal hernia rate by physical examination 2 years after surgery. Incidence of postoperative complications related to the stoma (dehiscence, retraction, stenosis, necrosis, surgical revision, prolapse and special needs of care of the stoma in the immediate or late postoperative period); 3) Incidence of postoperative complications assessed according to the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) scale. 4) Ease / difficulty in the management of stomatherapy devices by patients using VAS (Visual Analogue Scale). DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERVENTION: An end colostomy without placement of a prophylactic mesh will be performed in all patients. In the group 1A, a longitudinal incision will be made in the anterior rectus fascia and in the posterior fascia, with two Prolene sutures at the ends of the incision of the anterior aponeurosis. In patients of group 1B, a cruciate incision will be made in the anterior rectus fascia, as well as in the posterior fascia. DURATION OF THE STUDY: The expected duration of the study is 3 years. PATIENT FOLLOW UP TIME: The planned follow-up time is 2 years. EXPECTED RECRUITMENT TIME: 12 months.

Start: April 2019

The Safety and Tolerability of PD-L1 Monoclonal Antibody Plus Lenalidomide in The Treatment of Colorectal Cancer

This study proposed by increasing dosage and expand the "3 + 3" queue, main component is divided into two phases, phase 1 for dose escalation, according to preliminary data recommended doses starting dose of climbing, the purpose is to evaluate the safety of combination therapy, tolerance, and explore the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and right dose recommended development stage;Phase 2 was the expansion phase. Patients were included in the expansion study according to the appropriate dose recommended in phase 1, to further evaluate the safety and tolerability of combination therapy, recommend appropriate dose for phase II clinical trial, and preliminarily explore the efficacy of combination therapy.

Start: May 2020

Codman Catheter/Synchromed Pump Hepatic Artery Chemotherapy for Unresectable Colorectal Metastases/Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Due to discontinuation of the Codman C3000 pump, an alternate device is necessary to continue serving patients in need of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. This study aims to test the safety of hepatic artery infusion pump placement, a standard surgical procedure, and intraarterial chemotherapy initiation with the standard medication floxuridine (FUDR), using the Medtronic Synchromed II pump combined with the Codman arterial catheter in patients with unresectable (not removable by surgery) liver metastases from colorectal cancer and unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. This study will determine if complication and pump loss rates will be similar to previously published rates for the Codman system.

Start: May 2020

Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis to Optimize the Operative and Postoperative Treatment for Patients With Colorectal Cancer - Intervention Trial 2

IMPROVE-IT2 is a randomized multicenter trial comparing the outcomes of ctDNA guided post-operative surveillance and standard-of-care CT-scan surveillance. The hypothesis of this study is that ctDNA guided post-operative surveillance combining ctDNA and radiological assessments could result in earlier detection of recurrent disease and identify more patients eligible for curative treatment.

Start: January 2020

Oncogeriatric Intervention and Follow-up at Home

The study is a randomized study of patients living in four municipalities in Eastern Jutland. After geriatric assessment half of the patients will be offered a tailor-made intervention in their homes. The follow-up will last for at least 90 days and include treatment of the patients' multimorbidity, e.g. of dehydration, anaemia, infections, and malnutrition. The other half of the patients, the results of the assessment and recommendations will be given to the patients and their general practitioner. The primary efficacy variables are accomplishment of planned cancer treatment, reduction of complications and admissions to hospital and increased quality of life,. If geriatric assessment and a tailor-made follow-up result in a better quality of life with less complications and admissions the offer may be extended to a longer period, younger age groups and other cancer diagnoses.

Start: January 2016

Systemic Oxaliplatin or Intra-arterial Chemotherapy Combined With LV5FU2 and an Target Therapy in First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Restricted to the Liver

Colorectal cancer is the 3rd most common cancer in France and the 2nd cause of death from cancer. Between 30 to 60% of patients develop limited or predominant liver metastases. Surgical resection of these metastases, only curative treatment is not immediately possible in 10-15% of cases. In unresectable patients, current palliative treatments are based on systemic chemotherapy associated or not with the targeted therapies (anti-EGFR (panitumumab), anti-VEGF (bevacizumab)). In this patient population, special attention was paid to intensified treatment regimens in order to improve their efficiency and improving the tumoral response rate, the intensity of the response and its earliness correlate with improved overall and progression-free survival. The intra-arterial use of oxaliplatin coupled with IV chemotherapy has yielded OR levels of 64% in patients having survived one or more lines of chemotherapy IV and 62% in patients who have progressed on oxaliplatin IV. In addition, the HIA administration of oxaliplatin limits systemic and especially neurological toxicities, thanks to a greater hepatic clearance. In conclusion, the combination of systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy and HIAC with oxaliplatin has showed promising efficacy results associated with good tolerance from the first line onwards. Indeed, we can expect from the Phase II recent data, a control rate close to 100%, with high response rates associated with early maturity and depth responses as well as prolonged survival. However, to date, in the absence of randomized trial testing this combination, this strategy does not have sufficient evidence to be integrated in our routine practices, and HIAC remains limited to a few expert centers in treatment catch-up.

Start: December 2016

Aflibercept +/- LV5FU2 in First Line of Non-resectalbe Metastatic Colorectal Cancers

This is what the FFCD 11-01 - PRODIGE 25 trial proposes to study, as a preliminary for strategic studies evaluating the usefulness of including targeted therapeutics from the first line with aflibercept +/- LV5FU2.

Start: May 2015

Study of Intrahepatic Arterial Infusion of TG6002 in Combination With 5-FC in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

This study will include two parts: Phase I part is a dose-escalation study to assess the safety of increasing doses of TG6002 in combination with oral flucytosine (5-FC) in consecutive cohorts of 3 to 6 patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable liver metastases according to a 3+3 design Phase IIa part is an extension of the phase I part at the recommended phase II dose to evaluate the efficacy of TG6002 in combination with oral flucytosine (5-FC) in patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable liver metastases. In both parts, tumor response will be evaluated on local assessment using RECIST 1.1. All patients will be followed until disease progression, death due to any cause or the date of data cut-off, whichever occurs first.

Start: January 2020

Analysis of Intestinal Microflora Combined With DNA Methylation in Stool to Detect Colorectal Cancer

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) has the third highest incidence rate and the fourth mortality rate in the world. Traditional colonoscopy as an invasive examination method cannot be widely used in screening for colorectal neoplasia. The fecal immunochemical test has some limitations in sensitivity. Also, race and regional differences may affect results. Abnormality in the composition of the gut microbiota has been implicated as a potentially important etiologic factor in the initiation and progression of colorectal cancer. Analyzing fecal flora and exfoliated cell genes may represent a new screening tool for colorectal cancer.This research aims to use 16S rRNA to compare differences in fecal flora between colorectal cancer patients and healthy controls. These data combined with DNA findings of fecal exfoliated cells may further clarify this difference to build a model for screening early colorectal cancer in Chinese people. Methods and analysis: In total, 300 patients with positive colonoscopy results and 200 health controls will be recruited. All participants will complete an information form and questionnaires. Fecal samples will be examined by 16S rRNA analysis. Gene methylation levels will be detected in fecal exfoliated cells. Models of related intestinal microbiota and methylation genes will be built. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis will be used to select some models with appropriate sensitivity and specificity.The models will be further validated by multicenter studys.

Start: February 2018

Longitudinal Performance of Epi proColon

This study will evaluate longitudinal performance of Epi proColon with respect to test positivity, longitudinal adherence to Epi proColon screening, adherence to follow-up colonoscopy and diagnostic yield, as well as assay failure rates.

Start: August 2017

Safety and Efficacy of Vicriviroc (MK-7690) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Participants With Advanced/Metastatic Microsatellite Stable (MSS) Colorectal Cancer (CRC) (MK-7690-046)

This trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of vicriviroc (MK-7690) at 2 dose levels in combination with pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in participants with advanced/metastatic microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC).

Start: September 2018

Diagnostic Yield of Colonoscopy Surveillance in Testicular Cancer Survivors Treated With Platinum-based Chemotherapy

Testicular cancer (TC) survivors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy have an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) (hazard ratio (HR) 3.9 for platinum-containing chemotherapy versus no platinum-containing chemotherapy, 95% confidence interval 1.7-8.9). Colonoscopy screening can reduce CRC incidence and mortality. Given this increased risk of CRC, colonoscopy surveillance should be considered for TC survivors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic yield of advanced colorectal neoplasia during colonoscopy surveillance in TC survivors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. The secondary objectives are to determine cost-effectiveness and burden of colonoscopy. Furthermore, the molecular profile of advanced neoplasia will be evaluated to create insight into the carcinogenesis. The effectiveness of fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) will be evaluated with colonoscopy as a reference. Finally, blood plasma platinum-levels will be determined to examine a potential correlation with the outcome of the ccolonoscopy.

Start: February 2020