300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

356 active trials for Chronic Pain

Pain, Learning, and Nocebo

Nocebo effects, negative responses to inert or active treatments which are putatively induced by negative outcome expectations, have been shown to play a significant role in pain perception. The underlying neurobiological mechanisms of these effects remain largely unexplored. The primary objective of this study is to test the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-dependent learning in an experimental model of conditioned nocebo effects on self-reported pain. Secondary objectives are to examine the role of the NMDA manipulation and related neural correlates during the acquisition and extinction of nocebo effects using statistical learning models. This study will utilize a placebo controlled, double-blind design with respect to the pharmacological administration of 80 mg D-Cycloserine (DCS), an NMDA agonist, or placebo. Validated conditioning and verbal suggestion (VS) paradigms will induce nocebo effects on pain in a random sample of 50 healthy adults. The primary endpoint of the study is the magnitude of the induced nocebo effect on pain measured as the difference between self-reported pain, between the first conditioned and control extinction trials. Secondary endpoints include the classification analysis of the Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) responses of participants into pharmacological groups with multivariate pattern analysis. This study will be conducted at Leiden University and the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), The Netherlands.

Start: February 2021
Global Registry for the Use of Spectrum Therapeutics Cannabis Products in Subjects With Chronic Pain

Chronic pain affects at least 10% of the global population but is often poorly managed, given the variable efficacy of available pharmacological treatments and the limited accessibility of multidisciplinary interventions. The legalization of cannabis in at least 14 countries and the increasing regulatory approval of cannabis preparations and synthetic cannabinoids and analogues have led to a growing interest in the use of medical cannabis products to manage chronic pain. This use is supported by research demonstrating important interactions between cannabinoids and the human endocannabinoid system and pain modulation pathways. While medical cannabis products are increasingly available to practitioners who treat pain, there is little evidence-based guidance for prescribing or titrating these treatments to manage chronic non-cancer pain. This prospective registry aims to assemble real-world data regarding the use of Spectrum Therapeutics (ST) medical cannabis products in subjects with chronic non-cancer pain in countries where these products are commercially available. The registry will also assess treatment outcomes, including pain and related symptoms, global impressions of improvement, and change in concomitant pain medications (opioid use in particular), to better inform the utility of ST products for chronic non-cancer pain management. Primary Objective: • To describe patterns of physician selection of Spectrum Therapeutics (ST) medical cannabis treatment regimen, expressed as average daily dose of THC and CBD (in mg), and mode of administration (ingested or inhaled), in the management of chronic non-cancer pain in countries where these products are commercially available. Secondary Objectives: To describe subject product and dose adjustment (under medical follow-up) over time. To assess outcomes of treatment, including pain relief and effects on sleep, daily functioning, and quality of life. To assess global impressions of treatment effectiveness as reported by subjects and physicians. To assess changes in daily dose of opioids, other medications over time. Safety Objective: • To assess the safety and tolerability of ST products in subjects with chronic pain.

Start: November 2020
Neurophysiological Mechanisms Involved in Knee Osteoarthritis

Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective intervention to relieve people with osteoarthritis (OA). Nevertheless, 15 to 30% of patients continue to experience severe pain following surgery. Recent data suggest that central nervous system (CNS) changes may play a role in OA pain and possibly explain why some patients have poorer clinical outcomes following TKA. Objectives: Our main objectives are to explore the relationship between OA pain and (1) the integrity of corticospinal system, (2) the efficacy of descending pain inhibition circuits. Methods: Fifty-two patients waiting for TKA will be recruited. The integrity of the corticospinal projections will be measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (recruitment curve of the affected quadriceps femoris muscle) and the descending pain inhibition circuits (bulbospinal projections) will be assessed by a counter-irritation paradigm (i.e., conditioned pain modulation with immersion of the arm in painfully cold water). Diffuse tension imaging (DTI) will also be used to quantify the strength of these corticospinal and bulbospinal projections. Clinical outcomes will be evaluated before and after arthroplasty with a series of validated questionnaires such as the WOMAC Scale, the McGill Pain Questionnaire and the Brief Pain Inventory. These different neurophysiological and clinical measures will be taken before surgery, 6 months after surgery and 1 year post-surgery. Anticipated results: The investigators expect a moderate association between pain and the strength of the corticospinal and bulbospinal projections. Moreover, it is expected that there will be a moderate association between the strength of the corticospinal/bulbospinal projections and the clinical evolution of patients.

Start: July 2018