300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

78 active trials for Cardiac Surgery

Protective Mechanical VENTilation Strategy in Patients Undergoing CARDiac Surgery

Heart surgery is a life-saving intervention for hundreds of thousands of patients each year worldwide. Advances in technology and medical expertise have improved outcomes for these patients over the years. However, despite such advances, approximately 30% of patients develop lung complications (also called "pulmonary complications") after heart surgery, which result in prolonged hospital stay, increased mortality and healthcare costs. During and immediately after heart surgery, the patient's breathing needs to be artificially controlled by a breathing machine, called "mechanical ventilator". The medical literature has reported that in critically ill patients the use of specific settings on the breathing machine (so called "protective mechanical ventilation") prevents lung complications and significantly decreases mortality. Studies show that such settings could also be beneficial for patients that undergo several types of planned surgery, however data regarding heart surgery patients (the most vulnerable to lung complications) are lacking.The aim of our study is to test whether the use of protective mechanical ventilation settings during and after heart surgery reduces lung complications compared to the current standard of care. The main innovation of this study is the application of a novel protective mechanical ventilation strategy to patients undergoing cardiac surgery, in order to reduce post-operative pulmonary complications.

Start: July 2017
Management of Antiplatelet Regimen During Surgical Procedures

There are key differences today in clinical practice regarding perioperative management of post-PCI patients on DAPT undergoing NCS. Moreover, there are significant differences between bridging agents, and improved safety of current-generation DES. Given the significant limitations of current studies a well-designed registry to study current U.S. practice patterns and the bleeding or ischemic risks associated with the various perioperative DAPT management strategies including bridging and no bridging will significantly add to the understanding of the current problem and associated risks of patients. These data could form the basis for conducting future randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in this area. NCS in post-PCI patients on chronic DAPT presents a complex interaction of both ischemic and bleeding risks. The MARS registry will study the area of perioperative antiplatelet therapy management through a multicenter observational national registry designed to collect pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative clinical strategies, therapeutic interventions and outcomes data. This proposal outlines the role of a highly experienced clinical trial team to conduct a multicenter prospective registry. This question is highly relevant to a diverse group of medical providers and millions of patients in the US and around the world; this will be the first such U.S. registry to address this critically important public health issue. Study objectives: i. To collect data on contemporary clinical practice in the U.S. on managing post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) DAPT in patients scheduled to undergo NCS and CS. ii. To assess ischemic and bleeding endpoints in this group of patients during the study period. iii. To generate initial data to plan for future large-scale randomized clinical trials on perioperative management of DAPT.

Start: August 2019
Platelet Transfusion During Neonatal Open Heart Surgery

Hypothesis: Dilutional thrombocytopenia after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is universal and administration of donor apheresis platelets just prior to termination of bypass will assist in early correction of coagulopathy, early hemostasis and lesser donor exposure of blood products after cardiac surgery. Background: What is the Problem? - Bleeding, Transfusion and Outcomes Excessive bleeding after neonatal cardiac surgery has been independently associated with increased adverse events, morbidity and mortality.1,2 Bleeding after neonatal open-heart surgery has multiple etiologies such as immaturity of the building blocks of coagulation, effects of deep hypothermia, longer CPB times, altered flow states and dilutional state induced by being on CPB leading to low platelet count, low platelet function, low fibrinogen levels, altered fibrinogen polymerization, complement activation, etc.2,3 The strongest predictor of transfusion after cardiopulmonary bypass in children was deemed to be the CPB circuit volume and the effect of hemodilution.4 The dilutional coagulopathy after neonatal CPB requires intense damage control resuscitation with massive transfusion of platelets, packed red blood cells (PRBC), cryoprecipitate, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and supplemental factor concentrates. In a previous study at this institution (IRB# HSC-MS-13-0647), we have shown that in neonates undergoing open-heart surgery there was a significant drop in platelet counts after bypass (71% change, baseline= 268 ± 90, Post CPB= 76 ± 27, 109/L). Associated with this drop , the average intraoperative transfusion load in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB at our institution constitutes of PRBC= 63± 43 ml/kg, FFP=51± 21 ml/kg, cryoprecipitate =12+6 ml/kg, platelets = 28 +16 ml/kg and cell-saver =27± 10 ml/kg. In addition 72% of these patients were exposed to a 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (Bebulin®). Although this "throw the kitchen sink" approach is effective in achieving hemostasis, it comes with significant effects on post CPB hemodynamics, constantly changing hematocrit, variable blood volume with inability to achieve steady state inotropic state affecting cardiac output, oxygen delivery and adding to pulmonary hypertension. Overall, having higher platelet counts at the time of weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass has distinct advantages of reducing transfusions and improving outcomes.

Start: April 2017
Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation by Low-dose Landiolol Administration After Cardiac Surgery

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication that occurs in 30-50% of patients after cardiac surgery and increases morbidity and mortality and hospital length of stay. During the perioperative period, the discontinuation of beta-blocker treatment is known to be a risk factor for developing POAF in patient undergoing cardiac surgery. Early beta-blocker reintroduction is associated with lower incidence of POAF. Unfortunately, side effects of currently available beta-blockers (including esmolol), such as low blood pressure and excessive bradycardia and/or their extended duration of action, limit their use in the post-operative period especially for prevention. Landiolol, an ultra-short acting injectable beta-blocker, offers the advantage of significantly limiting low blood pressure events while increasing therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of POAF in cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. Landiolol, when used at low dose in the postoperative period, has been showed to reduce the incidence of POAF with no increased incidence of side effect as compared to standard of care. The limitation is that these promising data come from single center studies with limited samples and conducted exclusively in Japanese population. If landiolol is approved for use in the treatment of atrial fibrillation in non-Asian patients, there are no data on the prevention of POAF in cardiac surgery. The objective of this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo- controlled phase III trial is to confirm that landiolol postoperative infusion is associated with lower incidence of POAF without excess of adverse events as compared to standard of care in a non-Asian population after cardiac surgery with sternotomy.

Start: January 2021
Role of Type 2 Diabetes in Potentiating the Inflammatory Response Post Extracorporeal Circulation After Cardiac Surgery

Adult cardiac surgery ensures the surgical treatment of valvular and coronary pathologies and of heart failure with the placement of ventricular assistance. Extracorporeal circulation (ECC) is one of the major technical advances associated with cardiac surgery to replace cardiac and pulmonary functions during surgery. ECC can nevertheless lead to postoperative complications, the origin of which is linked to the patient's initial contact with the circuit and membranes of the ECC. This contact triggers a series of humoral and cellular reactions that occur in the first few hours after the ECC and the inflammatory syndrome post ECC fades on its own and usually disappears between the 4th and 6th postoperative day. If the inflammatory response post ECC is most often transient, certain conditions will maintain and intensify this response at the origin of postoperative complications, possibly leading to the patient's death. Among these situations, the investigators find the notion of emergency cardiac surgery, a patient's age over 75 years and a preoperative history of decompensated heart failure, renal failure or type 2 diabetes (T2D). The inflammasome family of receptors of the nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD) type, pyrin domain containing 3, NLRP3, is a multi-protein platform of recent discovery which plays a major role in the signaling pathways of the innate inflammatory response. The role of the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in cardiovascular pathologies is now well established and its metabolic priming by hyperglycemia could explain the greater seriousness of these pathologies in T2D patients due to an exacerbated inflammatory response. What is the effect of T2D status on the inflammatory response post ECC, mediated by the NLRP3 inflammasome, in patients after cardiac surgery?

Start: April 2021
Outcome Impact of Different Tranexamic Acid Regimen in Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Background and Significance A growing amount of evidence linking transfusion of allogeneic blood products with negative patient outcomes and increased cost continues to drive interest into strategies and technologies that limit patient exposure to this risk. The single largest consumer of this resource continues to be cardiac surgery, with 20% of the world wide use of allogeneic blood products accounted for by this cohort. The lysine analogs tranexamic acid (TXA) has gained wide spread use in cardiac surgery as a blood-sparing agent. Mounted evidence has proved its efficacy and safety in cardiac surgery. However, the optimal dose regimen of TXA and the impact on patients' outcomes remains debated. Study Objectives The primary objective of the study is to analyze the primary efficacy (superiority) and primary safety (non-inferiority) of the two dose regimen of tranexamic acid.. The primary efficacy endpoint includes perioperative allogeneic transfusion rate, and the primary safety endpoint includes the 30-day rate of the composite of perioperative renal dysfunction, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, seizure, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and all-cause mortality. The secondary objectives are to demonstrate the efficacy of the two dose regimens in reducing perioperative allogeneic transfusion volume, postoperative bleeding (chest tube drainage), reoperation rate, mechanic ventilation duration, ICU stay, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization cost. Study Endpoints The primary endpoints include efficacy and safety. The primary efficacy endpoint includes perioperative allogeneic transfusion rate, and the primary safety endpoint includes the 30-day rate of the composite of perioperative renal dysfunction, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, seizure, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and all-cause mortality. The key secondary endpoints of the study are defined as perioperative allogeneic transfusion volume, postoperative bleeding (chest tube drainage), reoperation rate, mechanic ventilation duration, ICU stay, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization cost. Study Population Adult patients aged 18-70 years undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass are included. Totally 3008 patients will be required for this study (1504 in each of the 2 groups). Study Design The study is a multicenter, randomised, double-blind trial. Cardiac surgery patients with cardiopulmonary bypass will be randomised to Dosage 1 regimen group or Dosage 2 regimen group of tranexamic acid. Study Treatment The dosage regimen is implemented with dose of loading (intravenous infusion in 20 mins), maintenance (throughout the surgery), and pump prime (added into the bypass machine). The Dosage 2 regimen contains an intravenous bolus of 10 mg/kg after anesthetic induction followed by an intravenous maintenance of 2 mg/kg/h throughout the surgery, and a pump prime dose 1 mg/kg. As for the Dosage 1 regimen, the intravenous bolus and the maintenance are 30 mg/kg and 16 mg/kg/h respectively, and a pump prime dose 2 mg/kg. Patients, surgeons and research staff interviewing patients postoperatively will be blind to treatment allocation. Statistical Considerations The study hypothesis is that the Dosage 1 regimen of tranexamic acid is superiority to the Dosage 2 regimen in the primary efficacy endpoint, while at the same time, the Dosage 1 regimen is non-inferiority to the Dosage 2 regimen in the primary safety endpoint in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The sample size calculation is mainly based on the blood transfusion rate, and 30-day rate of the composite of perioperative renal dysfunction, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, seizure, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and all-cause mortality. For the primary efficacy endpoint, a sample size estimate of 1,214 randomized subjects (607 for each group) has 90% power to detect a 12.5% reduction (61.7% vs 70.5% between Dosage 1 regimen and Dosage 2 regimen ), by means of a single-sided ? = 0.025 Chi-square test. For the primary safety endpoint, a sample size estimate of 2,698 randomized subjects (1349 for each group) has 90% power to detect a noninferiority margin for the difference of 5%, by means of a single-sided ? = 0.025 log rank test. In order to conduct an interim analysis, the sample size in each group is 1504(10% drop-out rate) for the adjusted significance level (from 0.025 to 0.0245 in accordance with ? spending function by Lan-DeMets Method). Finally, the investigators decided to enroll 3008 study patients (1:1 ratio) for the OPTIMAL trial.

Start: December 2018
Pre-operative Risk Assessment of Surgical Site Infection After Cardiac Surgery

Surgical site infections (SSI) are serious complications accounting for 20% of all the healthcare-associated infections and are considered the second most frequent type of hospital-acquired infection in Europe and the United States. SSI after cardiac surgery is associated with delays to patient's discharge, readmissions and re-operations; and can result in increased hospital costs for staffing, diagnostics and treatment. Risk assessment has been identified as potentially useful intervention in SSI prevention and in identifying at risk populations who may benefit from specific interventions to reduce this possible complication of cardiac surgery. However, there is currently a lack of evidence as to which risk tools are the most valid and reliable to be used in clinical practice. The investigators developed and locally validated the Barts Heart Centre Surgical Infection Risk (B-SIR) tool to include patients with various types of cardiac surgeries and found that the B-SIR tool is a better tool in predicting SSI risk compared with the existing cardiac risk tools in the study population. However, various literatures recognised that the predictive performance of a risk model tends to vary across settings, populations and periods. Hence, the investigators aim to do a multi-centre validation of the newly developed B-SIR tool and apply all the other tools (Australian Cardiac Risk Index and Brompton and Harefield Infection Score) to identify what tool performs best that can potentially be use for the UK population. Further, the outcome of the study will be beneficial to future cardiac surgery patients to assess their risk of developing SSI and help identify those patients who may benefit from specific interventions. Existing patients' data, which will be anonymised, from the participating cardiac centres will be utilised to analyse and compare the performance of each risk tools.

Start: June 2021