300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

41 active trials for Brain Injuries, Traumatic

Feasibility of Improving Sleep Apnea Treatment Adherence After Brain Injury

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep disorder that commonly occurs in Veterans with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Untreated OSA increases risk of poor health outcomes including cognitive impairment, declining mental health, poor physical health, and premature mortality. Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the frontline treatment for OSA that effectively reduces the many negative health consequences of the disease. However, adherence to PAP is required to reap the therapeutic benefit. Unfortunately, PAP adherence is poor. A recent study showed that 68% of Veterans with moderate-to-severe TBI and OSA were nonadherent to PAP therapy. Psychoeducation is part of the standard of care for OSA treatment with PAP, but on its own is insufficient for improving PAP adherence. Alternatives to the standard of care include evidence-based behavioral interventions such as Motivational Interviewing (MI) and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) which have been shown to increase PAP use and improve PAP adherence in persons without TBI. Unfortunately, these evidence-based interventions (designed for cognitively intact individuals) have not been adapted to address PAP adherence in persons with moderate-to-severe TBI, who often require cognitive accommodations. The goal of this study is to test the feasibility of a novel 4-session manualized intervention, designed with cognitive accommodations, and informed by MI and CBT, to address PAP adherence in Veterans with TBI and OSA. Study Aims: Study Aim 1 will test the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the PAP adherence intervention. Study Aim 2 will evaluate the feasibility of outcome and process measures. To date, no treatment exists to ameliorate the adverse consequences of moderate-to-severe TBI. OSA is a treatable health condition that commonly co-occurs with TBI, which is a leading cause of long-term disability. Method: In this study, 19 Veterans will be recruited from inpatient and outpatient TBI and sleep clinics. Those meeting eligibility criteria (diagnosis of OSA and moderate-to-severe TBI; nonadherent to PAP, able to provide informed consent) will be invited to participate in the 4-session intervention followed by a qualitative interview to inquire about intervention acceptability. Study measures (e.g., symptom severity, sleep quality of life), will be administered pre- and post-intervention. Adherence will be measured via objective data from hospital software which monitors PAP use.

Start: August 2020
The Role of MEG in Assessment and Diagnosis In mTBI

Head injuries are responsible for 1.4 million visits to hospital each year in the United Kingdom (UK). Most patients are allowed home the same day and make a full recovery, but some will have persistent symptoms. The investigators aim to use the latest generation of imaging technology to investigate those with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) to better assess them. The investigators will invite patients presenting following trauma to the Emergency Department at Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK to participate. The investigators will compare those who have a suffered an mTBI to those who have non-head traumatic injuries. The investigators will use two magnetoencephalogram (MEG) systems and ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to record the functioning and structure of the brain within days of participants' injury. The investigators will test memory and thinking skills, then follow participants for six months, record the severity of participants' symptoms, and find out who does not make a full recovery. Multimodal imaging will consist of a standard MEG device using Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) sensors, a novel MEG device using Optically Pumped Magnetometer (OPM) sensors and seven Tesla MRI. The investigators will test whether these innovative imaging techniques are more sensitive to the acute damage that mTBI causes than routine imaging. The investigators will also test whether early imaging can reveal who is most seriously affected, identifying those who will not recover without additional support. It is currently not clear what the predominant mechanism of damage that causes these long-term problems is and the investigators hope this study will address this. The Medical Research Council is funding this work

Start: November 2019
Gait Training Through a New Over-ground Wearable Robotic System in People With Pyramidal Hemisyndromes

Over-ground exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation are studied enough in people suffering spinal cord injury, and its clinical use is escalating in the industrialized countries. Nevertheless, studies on gait rehabilitation through exoskeletons in subjects with Pyramidal Hemisyndrome (PH) are recognized by GRADE as Low Quality of evidence. This interventional longitudinal pilot study is aimed to investigate the feasibility, clinical effects, and compliance (from the experienced therapists (Indego Specialists)' point of view) of using an over-ground wearable robotic system (Indego) for gait rehabilitation of people with PH in the clinical practice. Two substudies will be conducted with the following aims: to explore changes in the gait pattern and muscle activity following Indego-assisted gait rehabilitation through the kinematic gait analysis (in subjects able to walk) associated with surface electromyography (sEMG) of 4 muscle groups of the lower limbs; to identify prognostic factors for walking recovery, investigating also the effect of the treatment on functional connectivity through the electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis. In order to satisfy the study aims, 30 subjects with PH and walking impairment will be recruited and assessed both clinically and instrumentally (in case of substudies) at the beginning (T0) and the end (T1) of the treatment period.

Start: September 2020
Buspirone and Melatonin for Depression Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are common. Post-TBI depression is associated with anxiety, aggression, fatigue, distractibility, anger, irritability, and rumination. The current research group conducted a pilot clinical trial, which investigated the novel treatment combination of buspirone and melatonin (B+MEL) in outpatients with clinical depression. Compared to placebo, B+MEL was associated with a significant improvement in depressive symptoms. Depression following TBI may be different from clinical depression. The B+MEL combination has never been studied in patients with post-TBI depression. The B+MEL has shown promise in ameliorating cognitive difficulties in people with depression. Because cognitive problems are typical in people with post-TBI depression, we plan to measure the effect of the B+MEL combination on cognitive ability in post-TBI depression. Additionally, we are interested in measuring functional magnetic resonance imaging changes before and after treatment with B+MEL in order to gain insight into the brain mechanisms of our hypothesized clinical symptom changes. The goals of the proposed pilot research project are to assess changes in symptoms in patients with post-TBI depression following Buspirone + Melatonin combination (B+MEL), and the corresponding brain mechanisms underlying these hypothesized changes by measuring: 1) depressive symptoms; 2) cognitive symptoms; 3) functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Start: August 2020
Combined Cognitive and Vocational Interventions After Mild-to-moderate TBI: a Randomized Controlled Trial

A considerable number of patients with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) experience long-lasting somatic, cognitive, and emotional symptoms that may hamper their capacity to return to work (RTW). Although several studies have described medical, psychological and work-related factors that predict RTW after TBI, well-controlled intervention studies regarding RTW in this group are scarce. Furthermore, there have traditionally been weak collaborations among rehabilitation services in the health sector, the Labor and Welfare Administration (NAV), and the work-places. The current project proposal describes an innovative randomized controlled trial (RCT) which will explore the effect of combined manualized cognitive rehabilitation efforts and supported employment in real-life competitive work settings for patients who have not returned to work 8 weeks post-injury. The project combines the rehabilitation and vocational science perspectives; it involves multidisciplinary collaboration, and explores the efficacy of increased cross-sectorial collaboration between specialized health care services and the welfare system. If the intervention proves efficient, the project will further describe the cost-effectiveness and utility of the program, and thereby provide important information of use for policy makers. In addition, the study aims at generating knowledge on the RTW-process both for the persons with TBI, and their workplaces, and to disseminate this knowledge in order to create new multidisciplinary and collaborative practices. The project has potential to generate knowledge of relevance for other patients with neurological deficit.

Start: January 2017
Management and Outcomes Following Emergency Surgery for Traumatic Brain Injury

Primary aim: The primary aim of the study is to compare survival to discharge (or survival to 14 days post-operatively, whichever comes first) following emergency surgery for traumatic brain injury (TBI) across Human Development Index settings. Primary outcome measure: The primary outcome measure will be survival to discharge (or survival to 14 days post-operatively, whichever comes first) Primary comparison: Between country groups defined by human development index. Centre eligibility: Any hospital or clinic worldwide performing emergency surgery for traumatic brain injury is eligible to participate. Patient eligibility: All adult and paediatric patients admitted to the participating institution with a traumatic brain injury for which they receive emergency surgery during the selected 30-day inclusion period are eligible for inclusion in the study. Team: Individual hospital teams with up to four people, collecting data for 30 days. Time period: Local study teams may select any 30-day period from the 1st of November 2018 and the 31st of December 2019 to start their study. Patients operated on who meet the inclusion criteria between 00:01 on day 0 and 23:59 on day 30 of the selected study period will be included. Validation: We will employ a method of data validation in every centre that will give us a quantitative estimate of case ascertainment that is feasible even in low-resource centres.

Start: November 2018