300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

54 active trials for Asthma in Children

Respiratory Outcome of Infants With or Without Documented Wheezing During Bronchiolitis

Hospital admission for infant bronchiolitis is associated with an increased risk of recurrent wheezing and subsequent asthma in childhood. In the literature, 17 to 60% of children will develop repeated wheezing (infant asthma in France). This highly variable incidence could be linked in part to the fact that the definition of bronchiolitis varies between continents. In Europe the usual definition is an acute and contagious viral infection which affects the bronchioles (small bronchi) of infants accompanied by coughing, rapid breathing and wheezing. In research studies, bronchiolitis must be associated with wheezing and / or crackles on auscultation in Europe, and wheezing imperatively in the USA. The diagnosis of wheezing is difficult, and medical agreement on auscultatory respiratory abnormalities is poor. We thus have developed a wheezing diagnostic tool using artificial intelligence processing of respiratory sound recordings by smartphone (Bokov P, Comput Biol Med 2016, DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.01.002). In a second larger bicentric study that included only infants suspected of bronchiolitis, our approach has consisted in obtaining a recording by smartphone but also by electronic stethoscope in order to allow deferred listening of the sounds (WheezSmart study). The objective of these studies was to obtain a formal diagnosis of wheezing, the current project aims to assess the benefit of this diagnosis. The main objective of this cross-sectional study is to determine whether the formal presence (diagnosis of wheezing from a recording of pulmonary auscultation) is associated with the risk of childhood asthma (diagnosis of asthma at 6 years) regardless of the usual risk factors (atopic / allergic terrain, exposure to smoking, recurrence of symptoms). The secondary objectives are to determine whether the formal presence of wheezing on auscultation is a risk factor for subsequent repeated wheezing (diagnosis of infant asthma) and for initial disease severity (bronchiolitis) compared to SpO2 and admission of the child to hospital. The interest in differentiating between high and low frequency sibilants will be evaluated also.

Start: April 2021
Personalised Outcomes in Children With Recurrent Wheeze

This project aims to develop a PROM for preschool children with recurrent wheeze. Nearly one third of children will have at least one episode of wheeze in the first five years of life. The majority of these children grow out of the condition in early school years. However, their families go through challenging times often with numerous emergency department admissions and hospitalizations. Hospital admission rates for preschool children with wheeze attacks remain high and are increasing in the UK. New treatments have become available, but although current treatments speed recovery from a wheeze attack, still many children visit hospitals for rescue medications and medical reviews. Recent Australian data show that one fourth of these children remain at emergency departments for a less than four hours period, suggesting that with better information and education, these children could have remained at home. Justification-Significance of the work By understanding what really matters for these families, clinicians and stakeholders will be better able to design interventions that will reduce the hospital attendances and admissions by empowering parents to manage their children's condition. More specifically, this tool will assist GPs identify which of these children need to be reviewed by specialists, aid holistic management, ensure interventions are meaningful for families and assess the benefits of novel treatments. Methodology The items of the questionnaire have been generated through discussions with families in a qualitative research study conducted by the research team. These items will be refined and the questionnaire will be tested with families in different healthcare settings. Researchers will assess how well this questionnaire is identifying the children who present with greater number of hospital admissions and will be benefited from suggested interventions. The data will be analysed and based on the results, amendments will be made to the questionnaire, which can will then be introduced in the routine management of these children.

Start: April 2021
Use of a Modern Breath Sampling System (the Pneumopipe® Combined With an Array of E-nose Sensors) for the Prediction of Treatment Response in Persistent Asthmatic Children

Due to a large disease heterogeneity, the proper management of childhood asthma may be a challenging task. Despite the screening of lung function is a fundamental tool, spirometry alone may not allow a reliable prediction of the disease prognosis, such as treatment response and asthma exacerbations. Recently, it has been shown that the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath (Breathomics) is able to predict asthma exacerbations and to discriminate children with persistently controlled asthma from those with uncontrolled asthma. These studies have been realized through gas chromatography / mass spectroscopy techniques, which also provide information on specific compounds useful for pathophysiologic research; however, they are expensive and time consuming. An alternative approach, scarcely adopted so far, is based on cross-reactive nonspecific sensor arrays (e-noses), which may provide valuable information on disease status through pattern recognition algorithms or discriminant analyses of the global sensor response pattern (breath-fingerprint). In particular, the Pneumopipe® (European patent 12425057.2, Rome, Italy) is a recent and innovative device allowing direct absorption of VOCs on a cartridge after an individual has normally breathed in it for 3 min. It is a very simple and cheap procedure, suitable for non-collaborative populations. Moreover, cartridges may be preferable over sampling bags in terms of preservation and transportability. This modern breath sampling system provides repeatable measurements, and negligible overlap has been observed with information provided by spirometry. The main objective of the present study is to assess whether baseline (pre-treatment) spirometry and e-nose measurements may predict asthma prognosis in persistent asthmatic children, in terms of response to the prescribed treatment with inhaled steroid (ICS), and to provide simple rules for discriminating treatment responders and non-responders. The secondary aim is to assess e-nose ability to predict asthma exacerbations, disease control and adherence.

Start: April 2021
Pragmatic RCT of High-dose Oral Montelukast for Moderate and Severe Pediatric Acute Asthma Exacerbations

Objective: To determine the extent to which high-dose (30mg) oral montelukast, added to standard treatment in children with moderate and severe acute exacerbations improves outcomes. Central Hypothesis: High-dose oral montelukast, added to standard treatment in children aged 5 to 17 years with moderate and severe acute asthma exacerbations, rapidly improves lung function, clinical severity, hospitalization rate and 72-hour symptom burden. Secondary Hypotheses: There are greater effects of high-dose oral montelukast on lung function and on the secondary outcomes in the presence of respiratory viral detection or leukotriene-mediated inflammation; and There is an interaction between viral detection and urinary leukotriene 4 level with treatment-response. Design: A two-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial of high-dose oral montelukast versus identical placebo, as add-on to standard treatment of systemic corticosteroid (SCS) and inhaled short-acting Beta-2-agonist (SABA), in children aged 5 to 17 years with moderate and severe acute asthma exacerbations. Intervention: High-dose oral montelukast added to standard treatment as one treatment-allocation arm, in comparison with standard treatment as the 2nd treatment-allocation arm. Primary and Important Secondary Endpoints: For the Primary Aim, the primary outcome measure to be compared between arms will be change of %-predicted airway resistance by impulse oscillometry (IOS) at 5Hz (%R5) at 2 hours after treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes will include improvement of %-predicted FEV1 (%FEV1), clinical severity measured using the validated Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score (AAIRS), hospitalization rate, and 72 hour symptom burden using the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Diary (PACD). For the Secondary Aim, the investigators will determine (1) The effects of high-dose oral montelukast on lung function and on our secondary outcomes in the presence of nasal viruses and of greater leukotriene-mediated inflammation; and (2) The degree of interaction between viral detection and urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) level with treatment-response. Laboratory evaluations: The primary outcome (change of %R5) and select secondary outcomes (%FEV1, AAIRS, LTE4) will be measured before and again at 2 hours after treatment initiation. The other secondary outcomes will be measured at the time of hospitalization decision-making by the clinical team (hospitalization rate) or at 72-hours after treatment initiation (PACD).

Start: September 2021
Cost Effectiveness Analysis of a Randomized Control Trial of q3h vs. q4h Albuterol as Discharge Criteria From the Hospital for Pediatric Asthma Exacerbations

Asthma is the most common chronic condition among children, and the third leading reason for hospitalization of children in the United States. It exerts a large healthcare burden on the US with estimated annual direct healthcare cost of approximately $50.1 billion with indirect costs of $5.9 billion. Asthma is characterized by airway inflammation and airway constriction. Albuterol and other betaagonists are first line standard of care for acute exacerbations and provide short acting smooth muscle relaxation and subsequent airway opening. The frequency of albuterol administration is dependent on the severity of the exacerbation. For hospitalized patients here at Children's Memorial Hermann (CMHH), patients may receive nebulized albuterol continuously or if the exacerbation is not as severe, receive albuterol intermittently. Intermittent albuterol frequency ranges from every two hour treatments, every three hour (q3h) treatments, or every four hour (q4h) treatments. As patients recover from their acute exacerbation, their frequency of albuterol administration is progressively titrated along this continuum. Expert consensus uses q4h albuterol as discharge criteria from the hospital. However, recent QI initiatives have studied the effect of q3h treatments as the discharge cutoff with no reported changes in safety or harm. There are no randomized controlled trials available. Furthermore, there are no economic evaluations available to see if costs saved by decreasing the length of hospital care are merely being shifted to subsequent clinic or emergency room care costs. We aim to conduct a randomized control trial to compare q3h vs. q4h albuterol as hospital discharge criteria for patients admitted for acute asthma exacerbations. We also propose to conduct a costeffectiveness analysis of the trial. If our hypothesis that q3h albuterol is safe and as effective as q4h albuterol as discharge criteria, we would be able to argue for a new standard of care that is more costeffective for this very costly and common disease of children in the United States

Start: December 2020