300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

131 active trials for Aortic Valve Stenosis

CoreValve™ Evolut R™ 34 mm System Registry (CoreValve34)

With the introduction of the CoreValve™ Evolut R™ 34mm (Medtronic™) prosthesis, patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) and large aortic annulus have become eligible for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study is to detect the number of TAVI candidates with large aortic annulus, and to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of TAVI using the CoreValve™ Evolut R™ 34mm.

Start: August 2017

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement to UNload the Left Ventricle in Patients With ADvanced Heart Failure (TAVR UNLOAD)

The objective of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) via a transfemoral approach in HF patients with moderate AS as compared with OHFT.

Start: September 2016

Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of routine FFR-guided complete revascularization with PCI compared to conservative management in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease who are undergoing TAVI.

Start: September 2017

Assessment of Paravalvular Leak After TAVI by Hemodynamic Measurements and Cardiac MRI

Rationale: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard therapy for elderly patients with high surgical risks. Paravalvular leakage after TAVI is relatively common and there is conflicting evidence regarding the clinical impact of mild paravalvular leakage in self-expanding devices. Prospective data for self-expanding devices are required to compare the extent of paravalvular leakage as a result of device design. Grading paravalvular leakage after TAVI is difficult. Echocardiography and angiography systematically underestimate paravalvular leakage (PVL) as compared to cardiac MRI. Hemodynamic measurements are used to aid decision making directly after TAVI implantation. Prospective data comparing hemodynamic measurements with cardiac MRI are needed to design an optimal strategy to grade paravalvular leakage peri-operatively in order to optimize TAVI outcomes. Objective: To assess procedural hemodynamic measurements in patients with paravalvular regurgitation quantified by means of cardiac MRI (CMR) and to analyse its association with impaired clinical outcome during 5-year follow-up. Study design: This is a prospective, single center clinical trial. Patients will receive a TAVI. After implantation different hemodynamic indices of paravalvular leakage will be assessed. At 1 month a cardiac MRI will be performed to quantify the amount of paravalvular leakage. Standardized clinical follow-up will take place at discharge, 30 days, 3 months and yearly up to 5 years. Study population: Approximately 80 patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with an indication for TAVI will be included. Intervention: Patients will undergo cardiac MRI on top of standard clinical care within 30 days after TAVI. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is defined as paravalvular leakage regurgitation fraction as measured by cardiac MRI. The secondary endpoint will comprise a composite of device success, early safety and clinical efficacy as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2)(1) and will comprise death, vascular complications, stroke/ Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), life threatening bleeding requiring transfusion, and acute kidney injury requiring dialysis.

Start: September 2019

Trial of Replacement Heart Valves in Patients With Narrowing of the Heart Valves

The primary objective of this study (LANDMARK) is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the Myval THV Series with Contemporary Valves (Sapien THV Series and Evolut THV Series) in patients with severe symptomatic native aortic valve stenosis. This study will be done in approximately 768 subjects (384:384, Myval THV Series vs. Contemporary Valves) The randomization will be carried out with an allocation ratio of 1:1 between Myval THV Series vs. Contemporary Valves (Sapien THV Series and Evolut THV Series)

Start: June 2020

5 Year Observation of Patients With PORTICO Valves

This study will further assess the performance and safety profile of the commercially available Portico Valve implanted, using the Delivery System and the Loading System, in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis through 5 years of follow-up.

Start: April 2013

Comparison of Transaxillary and Transfemoral Fully-percutaneous Approaches for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Retrospective, observational study to compare the outcomes of patient receiving TAVI through transfemoral and transaxillary fully percutaneous approach adjusting for main baseline differences.

Start: July 2019

A Clinical Evaluation of the HYDRA Self Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

The purpose of this study is the evaluation of the performance, safety and efficacy of Hydra Aortic valve in real-world patients. Following initial implantation, all patients will have clinical follow up at 30 days, 3, months, 6 months and 12 months

Start: August 2015

Quality of Life After Cardiac Surgery

During the last twenty years heart surgery has become safer and the number of patients having heart surgery has increased with more frail patients being offered increasingly complex surgery. Heart operations often improve survival and quality of life (QoL), but that is not true for all patients. Regarding survival, clinicians can measure the risk to life from having a heart operation and the risk to life from not quite precisely, but clinicians have little idea about the impact of heart operations on QoL, which is the outcome that patients care about most. Clinicians are unable to provide patients with robust information on how an operation will affect their QoL. This study will provide this information by analysing the data from patient questionnaires immediately before and after the procedure and monthly thereafter for 12 months.

Start: July 2019

Hamburg AoRtic Valve cOhoRt

The primary aim of the study is to identify the optimal treatment modality for patients with aortic valve disease, incorporating the individual patient's risk profile and anticipated clinical outcomes. This includes the association of demographic factors, procedural data and biomarkers with clinical outcome in a prospective fashion.

Start: September 2019

Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Aortic Valve Replacement in Routine Clinical Practice

This study evaluated effectiveness and safety of aortic valve replacement in real-world clinical practice.

Start: May 2018

Randomized Study for the Optimal Treatment of Symptomatic Patients With Low Gradient Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

According to current European Recommendations on valvular heart disease (VHD), "classical" severe aortic stenosis (AS) is defined by an aortic valve area (AVA) ?1 cm2 and indexed AVA ?0.6 cm2/m2, a mean aortic pressure gradient (MAG) >40 mmHg, and a maximal aortic velocity >4 m/sec. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended (class I indication) in patients with "classical" severe AS who have any symptoms related to aortic valve disease. In 2007, Hachicha et al. described a particular pattern of severe AS, characterized by an AVA ?0.6 cm2/m2, low mean pressure aortic gradient (MAG <40 mmHg), despite the presence of a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ?50%). This pattern of AS is encountered in nearly 15-25 % of patients who have severe AS. Typically, these patients are elderly subjects, with several comorbidities, a small left ventricular (LV) cavity with pronounced LV concentric remodeling and a restrictive physiology, leading to a decrease in LV stroke volume despite a preserved LVEF. The diagnosis and management of patients with low gradient severe AS and preserved LVEF are often challenging because: the presence of a "true" severe aortic stenosis should be carefully confirmed by a multi-modality imaging approach; the best therapeutic management (AVR versus conservative strategy) of symptomatic patients with low gradient severe AS and preserved LVEF is not clearly established. In very recently updated European guidelines on the management of VHD, symptomatic patients with low gradient and low flow severe AS and preserved LVEF have only a class IIa-level C indication for AVR. No specific indications are given for the management of symptomatic patients with low gradient and normal flow severe AS. This lack of indications is clearly attributed to a gap in knowledge which requires further investigations to be filled up.

Start: March 2019

Personalized Activity Intervention in Rehabilitation After Cardiac Operations (the PACO Trial)

The PACO trial is a randomized clinical trial conducted in Heart Centers of Kuopio and Turku university hospitals. The coronary artery disease, aortic valve stenosis and mitral valve insufficiency patients preparing for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve repair (MVR) will be randomized to either intervention or control group. The specific operation groups (CABG, AVR and MVR) will be analyzed separately. The 7-day baseline measurements of sedentary behaviour (SB), physical activity (PA) and sleep will be conducted to the patients by using the RM42 accelerometer during the pre-operative month. After the cardiac procedure is completed and the patient is moved to post-operative ward, the control group patients will begin the standard post-operative rehabilitation program of the participating hospitals (activity guidance given by a physiotherapist). Patients in the intervention groups will follow the identical program but after discharge they will also receive personalized activity guidance through the combination of ExSed smart phone application, Suunto MoveSense accelerometer and cloud system during the first 90 days of post-operative rehabilitation. Weekly evolving daily goals to replace SB with PA (daily goals for steps, moderate PA, light PA and standing, and sitting time limit) will be designed for each patient of the intervention groups. A new daily step goal will be delivered from the cloud system to the patient's smart phone in the beginning of each week of the intervention. The daily step goal of the first intervention week is based on patient's walking distance assessed by a physiotherapist in post-operative ward. The following goals will be automatically evolved in the basis of patient's personal average step count of the previous week. The MoveSense accelerometer will measure accumulated levels of SB, PA and sleep, and transmit the data to user's ExSed application with Bluetooth. With information about accumulated levels of SB and PA, the application is able to guide the patient to accomplish the predefined activity goal. The guidance and motivation will be offered with pop-up notifications and histograms (columns are fulfilled according to patient's accumulated daily activity). The researches retain a remote access to the activity data of patients in the cloud system. The ExSed application will be connected to the cloud system with internet connection. In addition, the patients of the intervention groups will receive short video files (lasting from 1 to 3 minutes) containing exercise guidance from a physiotherapist specialized to cardiac operation patients. These videos are available on the ExSed application during the intervention. The physiotherapist will also contact each patient (by mobile phone) with structured contact form from 1 to 4 times in a month to make sure that the intervention is proceeding as designed.

Start: April 2018

Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling In Aortic Valve Replacement With Single Strip Pericardium Versus Mechanical Valve

Aortic stenosis is a commonly found heart disease, which often leads to mortality and morbidity. Valve replacement using mechanical prosthetic valve will have an expensive cost especially in the Integrated Heart Center of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. In addition to the expensive cost, patients who have mechanical prosthetic valve have an increased risk of infection of the prosthetic valve and developing thrombo-embolism thus have to consume a lifelong anticoagulant therapy that increase risk of bleeding. A surgical technique using autologous pericardium is an alternative to prosthetic valve replacement, one of which is a single pericardium strip technique that uses modified autologous pericardium technique from Ozaki et al and Duran et al. The objective of this study is to investigate the outcome of aortic valve replacement with a single pericardium strip of autologous pericardium in patients with aortic stenosis. This study will be conducted at the Integrated Heart Center of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, by using quasi experimental type time series design. Subjects are patients with aortic stenosis who are candidates for valve replacement. Inclusion criteria is having low to moderate surgical risk (EuroScore II <5). The sampling method used in this study is non-probability consecutive sampling. This study will assess the outcome of the aortic valve replacement (valve hemodynamic, left ventricular reverse remodelling, sST2, 6MWT) at 3 months and 6 months post-aortic valve replacement. It is expected that aortic valve replacement using a single strip of autologous pericardium will have good valve hemodynamic outcome, yield left ventricular reverse remodelling, decrease sST2 level, show upgrade in 6MWT, and have shorter aortic cross clamp time so that it can be an alternative to aortic valve replacement using mechanical prosthetic valve that is less expensive and have good outcomes in patient with aortic stenosis.

Start: April 2017

Quantitative Measurement of Myocardial Perfusion by Cardiac CT in Patients

It is a common understanding that patients with coronary heart disease are suffering, among others, from reduced myocardial perfusion. In order to increase (normalize) the reduced perfusion, when a conventional approach failed, coronary bypass surgery, coronary vessel dilatation or stenting are performed. The similar situation with reduced myocardial perfusion may be found in patients with stenosis of the aortic valve, where aortic valve replacement may increase myocardial perfusion by left-ventricular remodelling. However, there is presently no method established to measure myocardial perfusion quantitatively and noninvasively before and after a therapeutic intervention. Data of pre- and post-therapeutic myocardial perfusion, quantitatively measured in ml/100g/min would strengthen the indication for specific therapeutic approach and enable an objective control of effectiveness of the applied therapy. Hypothesis: There is a measureable difference in quantitative myocardial perfusion values before (lower) and after (higher) interventional or surgical procedure. The goal of the study is to measure myocardial perfusion by advanced CT technology (e.g. iCT 256 Brilliance ) quantitatively in ml/100g/min in three groups of patients: Before and after coronary bypass surgery Before and after coronary vessel dilatation/stenting Before and after aortic valve replacement. The investigators will not assign specific interventions to the subjects of these three groups. Therefore, the research is strictly observational. Design: Prospective study to measure quantitatively myocardial perfusion in the above mentioned three groups of patients with simultaneous control and registration of all essential, physiological determinants of myocardial perfusion immediately prior to each CT study. The CT myocardial perfusion measurements will be performed directly after the indication for intervention or surgery and on the last day before discharge from hospital. All the collected data (determinants) inclusively the CT-studies will be anonymised and archived on a local server. The investigators of the University of Medical Computed Sciences and Technology, Innsbruck / Austria will perform the evaluation of the myocardial perfusion measurements and all statistical analysis independently of the CT-studies performing physicians.

Start: February 2015

STS/ACC Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry (TVT Registry)

The TVT Registry™ is a benchmarking tool developed to track patient safety and real-world outcomes related to the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure. Created by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the TVT Registry is designed to monitor the safety and efficacy of this new procedure for the treatment of aortic stenosis.

Start: June 2012

Preventive Heart Rehabilitation to Prevent Complications in Patients Undergoing Elective Open Heart Surgery

Rationale: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are at risk of developing perioperative complications and major adverse cardiac events, mainly related to both their preoperative status and type of surgical procedure. Postoperative exercise based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an effective therapy to prolong survival and improve quality of life. However, little is known about the effect on post-operative complications, quality of life and return to work of a combined pre- and post-operative CR program encompassing physical therapy, dietary counseling, psychological support and life style management compared to a CR program, which is provided only after cardiac surgery. Objective: to determine whether a pre- and postoperative (PRE+POST) CR program improves the short (up to three months) and long term outcomes (up to one year) of the cardiac surgery (i.e. reduction in postoperative surgical complications, readmissions to hospital and major adverse cardiac events in conjunction with improvements in the physical component of health related quality of life), when compared to postoperative CR only (POST). Study design: A Prospective Randomized Open controlled trial, Blinded End-point. Patients are randomized between two standard care CR programs. One group will start a the POST CR program after surgery. The other group will be randomized to a combined PRE+POST CR program. Study population: Patients (age > 18 years) admitted for elective coronary bypass surgery, valve surgery and/or aortic surgery Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is a composite weighted endpoint of postoperative surgical complications, re-admissions to hospital, major adverse cardiac events and health related quality of life (two domains: physical functioning and physical problem), at three months and one year after surgery. Endpoints are determined by an independent endpoint committee, blinded to the group allocation. Secondary, the study focuses on physical health (cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength and functional status), psychological health (feelings of anxiety and depression), work participation, economics, lifestyle risk factors (physical activity and smoking behavior), self-efficacy and illness representations.

Start: May 2017

BIOVALVE - I / II Clincial Investigation

First-in-Human clinical investigation to evaluate the safety and clinical performance of the BIOVALVE prosthesis in subjects presenting with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis, which are as judged by the heart team, indicated for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Start: September 2014

Comparison of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Younger Low Surgical Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

A randomized clinical trial investigating transcatheter (TAVR) versus surgical (SAVR) aortic valve replacement in patients 75 years of age or younger suffering from severe aortic valve stenosis. Study hypothesis: The clinical outcome (composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, MI and stroke) obtained within 1 year after TAVR is non-inferior to SAVR.

Start: June 2016

Safety and Feasibility of Early Discharge for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy, safety and feasibility of next day discharge home in patients undergoing self-expandable transfemoral TAVR utilizing the Vancouver 3M Clinical Pathway.

Start: October 2018