300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

51 active trials for Ankylosing Spondylitis

Efficacy of Myofascial Release in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis.

Axial spondyloarthritis (AS), is a chronic and disabling disease that mainly affects young people, generating clear limitations in mobility and functional capacity in patients who develop this disease. Although pharmacological treatment is the basis of the therapeutic treatment of (AS), non-pharmacological treatment is a fundamental complement that guarantees the optimization of movement patterns, in turn favoring independence in the basic activities of life daily through the management and control of the derived signs and symptoms. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of physiotherapy in treating symptoms in patients with AS, one of these studies is the Cochrane review developed by Dagfinrud et al. One of the techniques described by the Cochrane Review in the management of symptoms is orthopedic manual therapy (OMT), defined as a specialized area of physical therapy used for the treatment of neuro-musculoskeletal conditions, based on clinical reasoning, using approaches highly specific treatment plans that include manual techniques and therapeutic exercises. Among these manual techniques, it includes myofascial induction as the primary technique of choice for the management of soft tissue and fascial system restrictions, it has been shown to be in rheumatic diseases such as fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis, as well as in non-inflammatory mechanical diseases such as non-specific low back pain, a low-cost, rapid therapeutic action strategy with sustained gains over time in managing global symptoms. Currently, the effects of myofascial induction on the mobility and function of patients with AS are unknown, despite the excellent results that these techniques have shown in dysfunctions of non-autoimmune musculoskeletal origin. For this reason, this study will seek to evaluate the efficacy of myofascial release compared to sham therapy in joint range of motion in patients diagnosed with axial spondyloarthritis.

Start: December 2020
Impact of Barriers and Facilitators to Physical Activity in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis

Background: Patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA), such as spondyloarthritis (axSpA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are more prone to physical inactivity but derive specific benefits from regular physical activity. Barriers and facilitators to physical activity (B&F-PA) are key elements and knowledge of their correlation to physical activity is essential for developing interventions to promote physical activity that have a greater likelihood of success. Objectives: primary objective will be to measure the correlation of these B&F-PA to physical activity collected through apps. Secondary objective will be to (I) to quantify physical activity collected through apps in IA patients and (II) to observe the link between physical activity, B&F to physical activity and adherence to treatment. Patients and methods: This is an international, multicentric, cross-sectional study. Patients: From the first of September to the first of February 2020, all patients with definite axSpA, RA or PsA, aged above 18 and able to walk, who have a mobile phone compatible with apps that can track steps, who agree to participate and give his oral informed consent and with ability to read and write in the language of the participating country, seen in outpatient visits in the participating centers, will be asked to participate. The planed inclusion was 200 participants. Data collection: clinical data and information about physical activity and B&F-PA will be entered by rheumatologists during or electronically by patients at the same time point. Questionnaire for B&F-PA: a patient reported questionnaire was recently developed for this study in 2019 based on a systematic review to identify the main B&F-PA. A list of questions was generated from the systematic review reviewed and tested for face validity by 11 experts and confronted to 20 patients with IA through a cognitive debriefing. Physical activity: Physical activity will be measured objectively during the last 7 days by apps already installed by default on the mobile phone of participants and subjectively with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short version (IPAQ-S). Other outcomes: Stage of exercise behavior change and adherence to treatment will also be collected. Planned analyses: Perceived B&F-PA will be described using frequencies. A score will be calculated for each participant representing the limitations or facilities to perform physical activity. Analysis of the physical activity: The distribution of mean number of steps will be assessed visually for outliers. Univariate analysis will be completed between mean number of steps and gender, age, disease and stages of change. Correlation between mean number of steps and IPAQ-S score will be calculated. Link between physical activity and barriers and facilitators: The link between B&F questionnaire score and mean number of steps will be tested using linear regression. Then multivariate regression including demographic variables, psychological status and disease characteristics will be performed. Outcomes of the study: The expected outcomes of the ImBAIA study are a better understanding of B&F to physical activity in patients with IA and their impact to limit or to favor physical activity. We also expect to observe the level of physical activity of an IA population objectively measured with apps. Finally, a validation was expected to use questionnaire of B&F.

Start: September 2019
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Biosimilar and Legacy Drugs

In Canada and worldwide there is a need for updated independent real-world comparative effectiveness and safety data related to biologic drugs including biosimilar drugs. Biosimilar drugs hold potential to improve access to needed therapies at reduced cost enabling savings to be reallocated to other needs. However updated real-world evidence on comparative effectiveness and safety of biosimilar drugs is lacking. Investigators aim to demonstrate feasibility of creating network of clinical cohorts and other resources to provide real-world information on use of biosimilar drugs in Canada. The core revolves around clinical datasets but investigators will complement with other data sources. Investigators will review data from National Prescription Drug Utilization Information System database that contains prescription claims-level data collected from publicly financed drug benefit programs in different provinces to conduct an environmental scan of the use of biosimilars and respective legacy drugs and other anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor agents covered by provincial drug plans from 2014-2017. Initial analysis will help to confirm that use of biosimilars is lower than corresponding legacy drugs. Biologic drugs are relatively new and expensive drugs; biosimilar medicines are similar to original biologic drugs but cost less. If patients receive biosimilar drugs rather than originator biologics healthcare systems may be able to save money. Those savings can be used for other health care needs to benefit more Canadians. However investigators do not have detailed information on safety and effectiveness of these biosimilar drugs. The aim of study is to compare safety and effectiveness of biosimilar drugs to originator biologic drugs. Investigators will study patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (RA and AS) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (CD and UC) and across Canada on these drugs. Primary focus is on patients without history of biologic drug use but investigators will also study patients switching to biosimilar drug from an originator biologic drug. Investigators will measure how long patients stay on treatment, if patients require new treatment, if the patients' disease control improves and occurrence of side effects such as infection that could be related to these drugs.

Start: November 2018