300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

180 active trials for Alcohol Use Disorder

Social Cognition and Executive Functions in Alcohol Use Disorders - Transverse Study

Over the past few years, researchers and clinicians have stressed the major role of executive and social cognition impairments in the development and the maintenance of Alcohol Use Disorders (AUD). Executive functions are defined as functions for behavioral control that help us to adjust the investigator's behavior in a flexible way in non-familiar, non-routine situations. Executive functions encompass different cognitive processes, such as inhibition, mental flexibility, updating, planification, abstraction, rule deduction or organization. Studies comparing AUD patients to healthy controls have shown that AUD usually is associated with a large range of deficits. More recently studies have also emphasized a weakness of executive functioning among healthy participants with a positive family history of AUD. Social cognition refers to all cognitive processes that enable us to communicate and to interact with social environment in an appropriate manner. Among the most common social cognition sub-components are theory of mind (defined as the capacity to understand other people's mental states as for instance beliefs and desires), empathy, and emotion recognition. Emotional and interpersonal difficulties have a high prevalence in AUD and chronic alcohol consumption is often linked to social conflicts, misunderstandings, a lack of social support and isolation. Indeed, AUD patients have difficulties in understanding their own mental states and emotions as well as those of their social environment. Few studies have investigated the interdependency between these cognitive impairments in AUD while a better understanding of the link between executive functions and social cognition seems crucial in order to better characterize the nature of AUD patients' deficits and thus their caring.

Start: December 2020
Internet-delivered Therapy for Alcohol Misuse: Investigating Patient Preference for Self-guided or Guided Treatment

Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) shows promise as a method of treating alcohol misuse. In this form of treatment, patients complete online lessons over several weeks that assist patients in developing skills to address alcohol misuse. ICBT can be offered to patients in a self-guided format or with guidance. Self-guided ICBT allows users to complete lessons by themselves without any contact with a guide. Guided ICBT involves having support from a guide in the form of emails, online messages and/or brief telephone calls. In some studies, guided-ICBT has shown greater reductions in alcohol consumption than self-guided ICBT. To date, there has been limited research on patient preferences for these varying levels of support when ICBT is offered as part of routine health care. This represents an important research direction as there is some past research showing that patients' treatment preferences can affect study enrollment, attrition, adherence, satisfaction, and outcomes. This study will investigate patient preferences for self-guided ICBT versus guided-ICBT and compare enrollment, attrition, adherence, and outcomes of the two approaches when patients select their treatment preferences. The study will also explore the extent to which preferences are related to patient background variables (e.g., duration, severity of problems, treatment goals in terms of patients wanting to cut-down on alcohol use versus to abstain from alcohol use). Furthermore, this study seeks to identify how ratings of effort and helpfulness throughout treatment vary depending on whether patients select self-guided versus guided ICBT. This study represents a pragmatic observational trial conducted in routine care and aims to increase understanding of how to implement ICBT within routine care.

Start: November 2020