300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

170 active trials for Advanced Cancer

Balance, Activity and Quality of Life

Background: Advanced cancer may cause functional limitations, subsequently leading to decreased ability to perform and engage in everyday activities, such as self-care, household, leisure and civic life. In addition, people with advanced cancer need alleviation from the pain and sorrow following limited life expectancy wherefore they prefer to focus on everyday life function and activities, lightness and enjoyment. The overall aim of the Balance, Activity and quality of Life (BAL) project is to develop, test and evaluate effectiveness and process of a resource-oriented intervention which coordinates rehabilitation and palliative care to enhance quality of life (QoL), balance and enjoyment in everyday activities and functioning. The development of the intervention is guided by the British Medical Research Council's guidance (MRC). The present study consists of a resource-oriented intervention, which will be feasibility tested in the research clinic of REHPA, the Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care. The study will inform the development of a resource-oriented program for people with advanced cancer. Material and Methods: A feasibility study designed as a one-armed, pre-post study with follow-up after five days and again after 6 and 12 weeks. The study will recruit 20-25 home-living adults (?18 years) with chronic or advanced cancer reporting needs in everyday life. Outcomes are quality of life, physical function and fatigue assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C-30). Furthermore, balance in everyday activities will be assessed using the Occupational Balance Questionnaire 11 (OBQ-11). Besides outcomes, process data will also be collected regarding: 1) fidelity, 2) adherence, 3) dose and 4) reach and mechanisms of impact with attention to participant's experiences of and interactions with the intervention. These data will be collected using registration forms, questionnaires, participant-observations and focus-group interviews.

Start: May 2021
Efficacy and Safety of High Dose Aprepitant Treatment in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer death in worldwide. It is projected that the vast majority, approximately 80% -85% of all lung cancer diagnosis is Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Although there are significant improvements in the treatment of Lung Cancer in recent years, there is still an unmet medical need for a specific population which have advanced NSCLC and mostly is refractory to existing treatments. NK-1 antagonists are generally safe and well-tolerated drugs and approved for the treatment of chemotherapy induced vomiting and nausea. However, the recent findings in preclinical studies and preliminary results of some case reports have suggested that their potential in cancer treatment may not be limited to only antiemetic effects. In addition to the role of NK-1 pathway in emesis, the neuropeptide substance P (SP) binds to Neurokinin-1(NK-1) receptor and this binding regulates the carcinogenic cell proliferation, exerts an antiapoptotic effect, stimulates cell migration that leads to invasion and metastasis of tumor cells and lastly stimulates neoangiogenesis via endothelial cell proliferation. In this regard, the antitumoral effects of NK-1 antagonists against different types of cancer are a leading area of research interest and need for further investigation. Currently, there are three NK-1 receptor antagonists approved by health authorities: Aprepitant (Emend), its pro-drug, fosaprepitant (Ivemend) and rolapitant (Varubi). All of these drugs are non-peptid NK antagonists and have lipophilic properties. Therefore, they are not degraded by peptidase and can cross the blood-brain barrier (4). In addition to the potential effects of NK-1 antagonists in tumor area, their penetration to central nervous system may also prevent from or reduce the brain metastasis. The long term use of aprepitant as off-label is relatively common. In several case reports, long term use of aprepitant, up to 18 months, was successfully demonstrated in the treatment of refractory nausea and vomiting due to gastroparesis or other unexplained reasons. Additionally, in a very recent publication, it was reported that for the nausea and vomiting associated gastroparesis, long-term off label use of aprepitant was successfully received and well tolerated by three children (5 to 19 month-old) in the course of allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In the light of findings in preclinical studies, the antitumor effects of NK-1 antagonists are dose-dependent and the higher doses than approved antiemetic effective dose are need to achieve the antitumor activity. For aprepitant which will be used in present study, it has been recommended >20 mg/kg/day and prolonged use for antitumor activity. In a case report, prolonged use of standard aprepitant dose in a patient with metastatic breast cancer, had resulted with a reduction in CA153 tumor marker levels. In another recently published case report, a patient with lung cancer was treated with combination of aprepitant (1140 mg/day) and radiotherapy for 45 days, it has been reported that the tumor massed had disappeared without any side effect related to aprepitant treatment. It is fact that the evidence is not clear yet and further investigation in clinical trial settings is still needed for the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of high doses and long-term use of aprepitant, especially when administered alone to determine its own effect.

Start: March 2021