300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

138 active trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Effectiveness and Safety of Convalescent Plasma Therapy on COVID-19 Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared as a Pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). According to WHO report on March 31st 2020, globally COVID-19 have infected over 750,000 people and caused over 36,000 deaths with case fatality rate of 4.85%. In Indonesia, COVID-19 have infected 1,414 people and caused 122 deaths with case fatality rate of 8.63%. In severe cases, COVID-19 causes complications, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis, septic shock, and multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), where age and comorbid illnesses as a major factor to these complications. Up to this point there are several promising therapies for COVID-19 but is not yet recommended and in need of further research. The use of convalescent plasma has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through the scheme of emergency investigational new drug (eIND). This method has been used as the treatment in several outbreak or plague cases over the years, such as the flu epidemic in 1918, polio, measles, mumps, SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), EVD (Ebola virus disease) and MERS (middle-eastern respiratory syndrome) and this treatment shows better outcome. Several case report on the use of convalescent plasma for COVID-19 patients with ARDS and mechanical ventilation has been reported and shows promising outcome. Nevertheless, larger and multicenter research need to be done to assess and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of convalescent plasma therapy on for COVID-19 patients with ARDS.

Start: May 2020
Pulmonary and Ventilatory Effects of Bed Verticalization in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is defined using the clinical criteria of bilateral pulmonary opacities on a chest radiograph, arterial hypoxemia (partial pressure of arterial oxygen [PaO2] to fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2] ratio ? 300 mmHg with positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] ? 5 cmH2O) within one week of a clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms, and the exclusion of cardiac failure as the primary cause. ARDS is a fatal condition for intensive care unit (ICU) patients with a mortality between 30 and 40%, and a frequently under-recognized challenge for clinicians. Patients with severe symptoms may retain sequelae that have recently been reported in the literature. These sequelae may include chronic respiratory failure, disabling neuro-muscular disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorder identical to that observed in soldiers returning from war. The management of a patient with ARDS requires first of all an optimization of oxygenation, which relies primarily on mechanical ventilation, whether invasive or non-invasive (for less severe patients). Since the ARDS network study published in 2000 in the New England Journal of Medicine, it has been internationally accepted that tidal volumes must be reduced in order to limit the risk of alveolar over-distension and ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). A tidal volume of approximately 6 mL.kg-1 ideal body weight (IBW) should be applied. Routine neuromuscular blockade of the most severe patients (PaO2/FiO2 < 120 mmHg) is usually the rule, although it is increasingly being questioned. Comprehensive ventilatory management is based on the concepts of baby lung and open lung, introduced respectively by Gattinoni and Lachmann. According to these concepts, it must be considered that the lung volume available for mechanical ventilation is very small compared to the healthy lung for a given patient (baby lung) and that the reduction in tidal volume must be associated with the use of sufficient PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuvers to keep the lung "open" and limit the formation of atelectasis. In addition to this optimization of mechanical ventilation, it is possible to reduce the impact of mechanical stress on the lung. The prone position, for example, makes it possible to free from certain visceral and mediastinal constraints, to optimize the distribution of ventilation as well as the ventilation to perfusion ratios. Thanks to the technological progress of intensive care beds, it is now possible to verticalize ventilated and sedated patients in complete safety. Verticalization could reduce the constraints imposed to the lungs, by reproducing the more physiological vertical station, and thus modifying the distribution of ventilation. Indeed, in two physiological studies published in 2006 and 2013 in Intensive Care Medicine, 30 to 40% of patients with ARDS appeared to respond to partial body verticalization at 45° and 60° (in a semi-seated or seated position). In addition to improving arterial oxygenation, verticalization appeared to decrease ventilatory stress, related to supine position, and increase alveolar recruitment, with improved lung compliance and end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) over time. Nevertheless, 90° verticalization has never been studied, nor have positions without body flexion (seated or semi-seated). In these studies, only patients with the highest lung compliance appeared to respond. These data support the current hypothesis of subgroups of patients with ARDS with different pathophysiological characteristics (morphological and phenotypic) and therapeutic responses. The investigators hypothesize that verticalization of patients with ARDS improves ventilatory mechanics by reducing the constraints imposed on the lung (transpulmonary pressure), pulmonary aeration, arterial oxygenation and ventilatory parameters. The first objective is to study the influence of the bed position of the patient with early ARDS on the variations in respiratory mechanics represented by the transpulmonary driving pressure (?Ptp). The second objective is to evaluate changes in ventilatory physiology, tolerance and feasibility of verticalization in patients with early ARDS.

Start: March 2020
One Year Follow-ups of Patients Admitted to Spanish Intensive Care Units Due to COVID-19

The latest epidemiological data published from Chine reports that up to 30% of hospital-admitted patients required admission to intensive care units (ICU). The cause for ICU admission for most patients is very severe respiratory failure; 80% of the patients present with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARS) that requires protective mechanical ventilation. Five percent of patients with SARS require extracorporeal circulation (ECMO) techniques. Global mortality data has been thus far reported in different individual publications from China. Without accounting for those patients still admitted to hospital, bona fide information (from a hospital in Wuhan) received by the PI of this project estimates that mortality of hospitalized patients is more than 10%. Evidently, mortality is concentrated in patients admitted to the ICU and those patients who require mechanical ventilation and present with SARS. As data in China was globally reported, risk factors and prognosis of patients with and without SARS who require mechanical ventilation are not definitively known. The efficacy of different treatments administered empirically or based on small, observation studies is also not known. With many still admitted at the time of publication, a recent study in JAMA about 1500 patients admitted to the ICU in the region of Lombardy (Italy) reported a crude mortality rate of 25%. The data published until the current date is merely observational, prospective or retrospective. Data has not been recorded by analysis performed with artificial intelligence (machine learning) in order to report much more personalized results. Furthermore, as it concerns patients admitted to the ICU who survive, respiratory and cardiovascular consequences, as well as quality of living are completely unknown. The study further aims to investigate quality of life and different respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes at 6 months, as well as crude mortality within 1 year after discharge of patients with COVID-19 who survive following ICU admission. Lastly, with the objective to help personalize treatment in accordance with altered biological pathways in each patient, two types of studies will be performed: 1) epigenetics and 2) predictive enrichment of biomarkers in plasma. Hypothesis A significant percentage of patients (20%) admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 infection is expected to require ICU admission, and need mechanical ventilation (80%) and, in a minor percentage (5%), ECMO. Patients who survive an acute episode during ICU hospitalization will have a yearly accumulated mortality of 40%. Those who then survive will have respiratory consequences, cardiovascular complications and poor quality of life (6 months).

Start: May 2020
Valsartan for Prevention of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Hospitalized Patients With SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) Infection Disease

Rationale: The current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has a high burden of morbidity and mortality due to development of the so-called acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) plays an important role in the development of ARDS. ACE2 is one of the enzymes involved in the RAS cascade. Virus spike protein binds to ACE2 to form a complex suitable for cellular internalization. The downregulation of ACE2 results in the excessive accumulation of angiotensin II, and it has been demonstrated that the stimulation of the angiotensin II type 1a receptor (AT1R) increases pulmonary vascular permeability, explaining the increased lung pathology when activity of ACE2 is decreased. Currently available AT1R blockers (ARBs) such as valsartan, have the potential to block this pathological process mediated by angiotensin II. There are presently two complementary mechanisms suggested: 1) ARBs block the excessive angiotensin-mediated AT1R activation, and 2) they upregulate ACE2, which reduces angiotensin II concentrations and increases the production of the protective vasodilator angiotensin 1-7. In light of the above, ARBs may prevent the development of ARDS and avert morbidity (admission to intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanical ventilation) and mortality. Objective: To investigate the effect of the ARB valsartan in comparison to placebo on the occurrence of one of the following items, within 14 days of randomization:1) ICU admission; 2) Mechanical ventilation; 3) Death. Study design: A double-blind, placebo-controlled 1:1 randomized clinical trial Study population: Adult hospitalized SARS-CoV-2-infected patients (n=651). Intervention: The active-treatment arm will receive valsartan in a dosage titrated to blood pressure up to a maximum of 160mg b.i.d. and the placebo arm will receive a matching placebo also titrated to blood pressure. Treatment duration will be 14 days or up to hospital discharge < 14 days or occurrence of the primary endpoint if < 14 days. Main study endpoint: The primary study endpoint is the occurrence within 14 days of randomization of either: 1) ICU admission; 2) Mechanical ventilation; 3) Death.

Start: April 2020
Lessening Organ Dysfunction With VITamin C in Septic ARDS

The primary objective of the study aims to compare the effect of high-dose intravenous vitamin C vs. placebo on a composite of death or persistent organ dysfunction - defined as continued dependency on mechanical ventilation, new renal replacement therapy, or vasopressors - assessed at 28 days on intensive care unit (ICU) patients. As secondary objectives, the study aims: To compare the effect of high-dose intravenous vitamin C vs. placebo on: 6-month mortality; 6-month HRQoL; organ function (days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 14, and 28 if in ICU); global tissue dysoxia (at baseline); oxygenation Index (FiO2 x Mean Airway Pressure/PaO2) (days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 14, and 28 if in ICU, and if still intubated); occurrence of stage 3 acute kidney injury as defined by KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) criteria20; acute hemolysis as defined by: clinician judgment of hemolysis, as recorded in the chart, or hemoglobin drop of at least 25 g/L within 24 hours of a dose of investigational product PLUS 2 of the following: reticulocyte count >2 times upper limit of normal at clinical site lab; haptoglobin < lower limit of normal at clinical site lab; indirect (unconjugated) bilirubin >2 times upper limit of normal at clinical site lab; lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >2 times upper limit of normal at clinical site lab. Severe hemolysis: - hemoglobin < 75 g/L AND at least 2 of the above criteria AND requires 2 units of packed red blood cells; hypoglycemia as defined as core lab-validated glucose levels of less than < 3.8 mmol/L. To assess baseline vitamin C levels in study participants (before the first dose of investigational product).

Start: June 2020
Decision Support System to Evaluate VENTilation in ARDS

Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) residing in the intensive care unit (ICU) often require support for their breathing from a mechanical ventilator to provide adequate gas exchange, and although it is life-saving in this setting, it is also known to contribute to the morbidity and mortality in the condition. Mechanical ventilation delivers a volume and pressure of gas for each breath and can vary oxygen levels. Selecting the correct oxygen, pressure and volume levels is important, as incorrect levels can harm the patient, and result in an increased time connected to the ventilator. Recently, a system has been developed (the Beacon Caresystem) which advises the healthcare practitioner by the bedside as to how to best set the ventilator. This system is based on mathematics which describes the patients disease and may therefore provide ventilator settings which better suit the individual. The purpose of this study is to compare mechanical ventilation in ARDS patients following advice from the Beacon Caresystem to that of standard care to investigate whether the use of the system results in improved ventilation in all severities and phases of ARDS and thus reducing morbidity in ARDS. The investigators plan to recruit 110 patients (50 in the UK and 30 in each of the other 2 sites). The study also aims to examine the biological and physiological factors that determine the worsening of ARDS and the processes involved in recovery from ARDS with the aim to develop new therapies to help detect the condition and improve recovery. The investigators will utilise all raw data will be collected from the Beacon Caresystem to physiologically characterise the progression and resolution phases of ARDS. Additionally blood and Urine samples will be taken from healthy volunteers (100 in total) as a control comparison group for the biological analyses carried out in the DeVENT study.

Start: March 2020