300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

66 active trials for Acute Pain

Quantity of Opioids for Acute Pain and Limit Unused Medication

Opioids (morphine and morphine-like substances) are often prescribed to patients to manage pain after an emergency department visit. In the past 20 years, opioid prescriptions have risen sharply, accompanied by a significant rise in opioid misuse (e.g., recreational or non-medical use, potentially leading to addiction or overdose). One explanation for this crisis is the availability and easy access of leftover opioid pills in Canadian homes, allowing family members (including children) and friends to take them for reasons other than pain relief. Canada has no recommendations for the dosage, duration, or quantity of opioids that physicians should prescribe to manage acute pain at home. Physicians are therefore left guessing as to how much to prescribe when a patient with a condition like a fracture or renal colic is discharged from the emergency department. Our preliminary study showed that two-thirds of the pills from the initial opioid prescription to treat acute pain actually remained unused and were therefore available for potential misuse. The investigators propose to determine how many opioid pills are consumed by patients who suffer from acute pain as they recover at home. The investigators will ask 2,580 patients (from 6 Canadian hospitals) to record their pain medication consumption in a 14-day diary. The investigators will also determine, their pain intensity level, whether or not they had new opioid prescriptions, and health services revisits. In case of missing information, patients will be contacted by phone at 2 weeks. The overall aim is to help emergency department physicians prescribe the right number of pills in order to manage patients' pain and at the same time reduce substantially leftovers available for potential misuse.

Start: May 2019
The Alcohol-Pain Connection: Mechanisms and Genetic/Psychological Correlates

The societal impact of heavy alcohol consumption and chronic pain is substantial and warrants the existing research investment into their etiology and treatment. Moreover, evidence of significant co-occurrence between these conditions offers an opportunity to examine mechanisms in the alcohol-pain connection that may inform the development of novel treatments. Consistent with NIH PA-15-026 (Mechanistic Studies of Pain and Alcohol Dependence), the goal of the proposed study is to examine several complex and potentially bidirectional relations between pain and alcohol in one overarching model, which has never been attempted in a human experimental paradigm. The primary study aims are as follows: (1) to conduct the first test of both pharmacological and expectancy effects in acute alcohol analgesia among humans; (2) to conduct the first test of pain as a proximal antecedent of urge to drink and ad lib alcohol consumption, and to test whether acute analgesic effects predict pain-induced alcohol urge/consumption; (3) to test associations between study outcomes and candidate genetic polymorphisms that have been implicated in pain-alcohol processes; and (4) to conduct exploratory analyses of gender and pain relevant cognitive-affective factors as moderators of these outcomes. Participants will include 280 moderate-to-heavy drinkers recruited from the local community. Experimental methods will include alcohol administration (moderate dose vs. low dose vs. placebo vs. control) and pre/post assessment of static/dynamic pain responses, and capsaicin/heat pain induction (vs. no pain induction) followed by assessment of urge to drink and ad lib alcohol consumption. By employing a novel experimental paradigm, the study results will provide internally valid data with clear and direct implications for translating these findings to clinical applications. It is our expectation that this work will catalyze future research and inform clinical practice by establishing an experimental platform that allows for the demonstration of causal effects, the evaluation of treatment components prior to conducting costly clinical trials, and the identification of important theory-based biopsychosocial mechanisms that can inform the development of novel integrated treatments for individuals with co-occurring pain and alcohol use disorders.

Start: May 2017
Virtual Reality Use for Peri-Procedural Analgesia and Anxiolysis

Currently, most analgesic regimens for painful bedside procedures rely on pharmacologic sedation or high doses of opioids (e.g.: nurse-administered IV opioids, anxiolytics, and sedatives; patient-controlled analgesia; anesthesiologist-administered sedation; and occasionally general anesthesia). Pharmacologic interventions are frequently associated with suboptimal analgesia, opioid-induced side effects, requirement for increased monitoring due to over sedation, and progressive acute tolerance to opioids over time, particularly with multiple/repeat procedures. Alternative, non-pharmacologic strategies may help reduce pain, side-effects and opioid tolerance associated with painful bedside procedures. These strategies have not been studied as extensively, but are becoming more important in view of the current national opioid crisis. In particular, with recent technologic advancements, virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a non-pharmacologic modality for analgesia and anxiolysis, which can have tremendous benefits in acute pain management. VR provides an immersive, realistic, often interactive experience for the user. It is frequently described as "transporting" the user to an alternate environment, with the use of high-fidelity head-mounted displays (HMD), noise-cancelling headsets, and a complete audio-visual experience. The user's sense of "presence" in the VR environment is crucial in providing patient engagement, and correlates with non-pharmacologic pain control. VR has been shown to provide non-pharmacologic analgesia in children and adults undergoing painful procedures such as bedside wound care, burn treatment, and physical therapy. The use of VR during painful bedside procedures is one specific setting which offers a good starting point to investigate this technology for acute pain management. Our study wishes to determine if VR plus standard therapy provides superior analgesia for painful bedside procedures (e.g. burn treatment, wound care) compared with standard therapy alone. Our primary outcome is a reduction in pain scores by 30%, as measured by a numerical analog scale (NAS) during painful bedside procedures. The investigators will use a randomized, cross-over study design in which hospitalized patients receiving repeated painful bedside procedures, will be randomized to 2 groups. Group A will have an initial painful bedside procedure under standard treatment only, and a repeat procedure under standard treatment + VR. Group B will have an initial procedure under standard treatment +VR, and a subsequent one under standard treatment. Questionnaires including pain scores and secondary outcomes will be administered to each patient before and after the bedside procedure. A convenience sample of patients will be recruited over 1 year (anticipated N~30).

Start: January 2020